Data Disaster: A Call for an Investigation Into the CDC’s Conduct During COVID-19
Stand for Health Freedom
https://youtu.be/on_p-sKxjGc
17 Feb 2021

Take a stand: https://standforhealthfreedom.com/action/investigate-the-cdc/

Download the peer reviewed research paper highlighting the CDC's controversial conduct and learn more about the speakers here: https://standforhealthfreedom.com/CDC-investigation

Tune in to learn:
Why we should be concerned about death certificate data.
Why accuracy, integrity and transparency are so important during a public health crisis.
How the CDC set the stage for widespread devastation -- physical, psychological and economic.
What we can do so that incidents of this magnitude never happen again.

Panelists

Sayer Ji (Moderator) -- Author; Founder of GreenMedInfo; Co-founder, Stand for Health Freedom
Dr. Peter Breggin -- World-renowned psychiatrist and medical ethicist
Mary Starrett -- Chair, Board of Commissioners, Yamhill County, Oregon
Dr. David Martin -- Founder and Chairman of M-CAM Inc.; Batten Fellow at the University of Virginia's Darden Graduate School of Business Administration
Mark Thielman -- Superintendent, Alsea School District (Oregon)
Ana Garner, Esq. -- Attorney; Creator, Higher Path Solutions
Dennis Linthicum -- Oregon State Senator
Dr. James Lyons-Weiler -- Biomedical researcher; Scientific journal author; IPAK
Dr. Henry Ealy -- Naturopath; Scientific journal author; Energetic Healing Institute


 thank you everyone for joining us for
tonight's
uh broadcast we are doing a presentation
and a panel titled beta disaster a call
for an investigation into the cdc's
conduct during covet 19.
you know data accuracy integrity
transparency are essential aspects of
crisis management
and public health policy especially in
societies that value freedom
from accurate data we work together to
make decisions that are effective and
work for everyone
in this event we'll show you all the
ways that the cdc manipulated covid data
and
inflated cases and fatalities ignored
recoveries
and promoted public health policies
based on faulty data
transparency includes reviewing what
worked and also looking at what did not
work
and this is exactly what we are drawing
attention to
to today it's okay to be wrong but too
many times throughout this crisis we've
seen public officials attempt to
sidestep
accountability and double down on
ineffective policies that are based more
on assumptions than actual
science and verifiable data and why are
public health officials clinging to the
one size
fits all approach of mass and social
distancing policies
when there is highly compelling evidence
supporting the use
of safe and effective treatments such as
vitamin d
and vitamin c 11 months ago we were
asked to make a three-week sacrifice for
the greater good
almost a year later there's no end in
sight
if you felt in that you don't
know who or what or to trust anymore
you're not alone
to help bring in new ideas we've brought
together incredible panelists
who've invested thousands of hours of
investigative research into the topic of
covet 19.
we brought together peer-reviewed
authors in science attorneys taking
legal action
and elected officials civil servants and
educators
who are asking good questions on your
behalf
we brought them together to create a
conversation specifically
for you throughout this conversation we
will present
evidence that we feel justifies a
thorough investigation
of the cdc's conduct during the covet 19
crisis
our panel will discuss not only how we
got here
but more importantly what you can do
about it
there is going to be a very powerful
call to action so please bear with us
through the first two hours of this
event if you're one of millions of
people
who've lost so much and feel your pain
we we feel your pain
and stand with you I'm serious
co-founder of stand for health freedom
and we have so much to share with you
tonight
at the conclusion of our time today we
will give you
simple steps to take action to
participate and to use your voice to
help restore
transparency and accountability in the
data that drives public policy
and ultimately affects every single one
of your daily lives
so let me introduce you our panelists
now for many decades dr peter bregen has
promoted evidence-based compassionate
therapies
and been a champion for restoring
ethical and conscience-based practices
in the field of psychiatry he's an
expert
on the mental and emotional impacts of
covid public health policies
especially on our children welcome dr
bregen
is there one piece of mental health
advice that you could share with our
viewers right from the start
yes I think the fundamental human
problem in
any very stressful situation is not to
get
helpless so you learn to identify in
yourselves your children
your friends your spouse your co-workers
whoever you're working with
those signs of helplessness usually
looks like anxiety
but it could be anger it could be shame
guilt
anything negative that that person acts
like they can't handle
and we have to see that in ourselves
because a lot of the technique
of public health is to make people feel
helpless and docile so that they will
follow instructions
and do what they're told and not run
away
but not shut down but be there and
and and do what you're told and we need
to look out for these techniques
and look at the confusion that's being
engendered in this look at the
contradictory
statements and keep coming back to
but I don't have to get helpless about
this
and that will that will save your life
under many conditions
thank you so much for that dr bergen our
next panelist is
an inspired elected official who sought
accurate data
questioned the one-size-fits-all
guidance and courageously fought to
protect the citizens in her country
in her county sorry welcome yam hill
county commissioner mary starrett
what's one piece of advice you can give
to our viewers who want to get active on
the local
legislative level thank you sarah I'll
first quickly start with a story 30
years ago when I was in television I
interviewed a harvard trained
psychiatrist who was on my program
he wrote a book called toxic psychiatry
and he was dr peter bregen
and that book set me off on a journey
that was changed the whole trajectory of
my ideology
and it also led uh to me advocating for
children in foster care who are over
medicated on psychiatric medications
and it's led to advocacy on a bill
that's now before the oregon legislature
which would report require
accountability for over medicating kids
in foster care
I say that is because education is a
huge piece
if we can have in our sphere of
influence and
an impact on somebody who is in a policy
making position
I used to sit on that same program every
year roll up my sleeve and get a flu
shot
to influence other people to do it until
I was informed
this might not be the best course of
action so inform people have
relationships with your elected
officials
encourage them to look outside what
their normal
public health uh narrative is and
remember that all politics is local
and when elected officials feel the heat
they see the light
in a kind compassionate way educate them
make relationships and remember that
politics at the local level
is more nimble more flexible and more
responsible to constituents
that's so beautifully communicated thank
you mary
dr david martin is an author professor
tireless servant of humanity who has
been passionately investigating the
events that led up to the covet public
health response since 1999.
what he has to share is shocking to say
at least and will definitely inspire
action welcome dr martin wonderful to be
here sayer thank you so much
thank you what's one piece of advice or
takeaway you can share with our viewers
as we embark on reviewing the cdc's
conduct during covet
well it's important for us to realize
that going back to 1999 and from 1999 to
2002
a very insidious program hijacked what
was public health and turn this into a
commercial game
because it was in 1999 that the united
states
started funding what became the
recombinant research
in 2001 and 2002
specifically targeting the formation of
a coronavirus that was
increased in its pathogenicity but
decreased in its capacity to be
replicated
and by 2003 the cdc owned the patents on
sars coronavirus isolated from humans it
owned
the ability to detect that virus and
it owned the ability to actually do any
interventions around it so this has been
a commercial enterprise
since 2003 and it's important to realize
that cdc didn't not only fulfill their
public health obligation
but actually took from the public access
to independently verify any of this
information which gave rise to the game
plans
for the covid19 program which we'll
cover in much greater detail
wow thank you for that um very very
important context for this
discussion next we have superintendent
mark thielmann who's one of a few
superintendents who
fought for his students teachers
administrators to make sure
in person education happened and
happened safely
now he's fighting to make sure his
students get to play sports and his
teachers don't have to choose between
a jab or a job welcome superintendent
thielmann
what's one piece of advice you'd like to
share with any parents watching
well thank you for having me and I
appreciate it I apologize I had to
double in on my cell phone because our
internet temporarily went down and
this is one of the the downsides of
rural education in oregon
um a couple things I want to share with
folks is that um
you know in terms of public education
it's so important
that we get good information especially
when we're dealing with
people's children and their taxes and
this whole
process that we've gone through with the
pandemic and among other issues has been
extremely frustrating
so uh we we were in a position of of
saying you know where we exist to serve
families and students
and so we pushed back and we've been
successful at
being allowed to stay open and the
difference it's made for
for students and families it's it's
incalculable
and I just really want to encourage
everyone to uh
stand up and and to really do their own
research
uh because that's what we did and we
showed that schools can operate
safely with cove and mitigation of
course
and we've had zero cases of covenant
we've been open since august so
I just really want to try to encourage
and empower everyone to focus on what
we're able to do and what we can do
rather than all the things that could go
wrong
thank you that's a very strong example
of what's possible for so many others
out there
so thank you for that so anna garner is
a fierce attorney with over three
decades of courtroom experience she's
introduced a number of potentially
historic cases regarding covet 19
including a case against the cdc she
wants you to know that despite the lack
of media coverage there are over 900
current cases filed with respect to this
crisis
welcome miss garner thank you thank you
for having me
thank you for being here what's a fun
tidbit of information you can share
about
covet cases well I certainly echo the
sentiment
of the other panelists who've spoken and
that is that the
collection of data is a very important
function
that the cdc engages in and when they
changed their
method of reporting deaths but only
deaths related to covet 19
they skewed their reporting in a way
that
lacks the integrity that the laws say
that they must adhere to
so we ended up filing a lawsuit against
the human health
services department and the cdc um
in which we're asking the court for
injunctive relief
asking them to stop the cdc from using
these falsified numbers as a result of
the way that they now
code these debts and the lawsuit by the
way was inspired
by the article that
dr ely and etal wrote and we're very
grateful for him we knew that they had
changed the rules but we didn't realize
uh some of the ramifications of it until
we read his report so he was
definitely an inspiration in that and
we're very we'll talk more about the
other lawsuits later
but we're really passionate about
clearing up
the misrepresentation of data that's
happened that has driven
the policy decisions by the states that
have caused more damage
in our belief than the disease itself
wonderful thank you for that
so we're very lucky to have our next
panelist state senator dennis
lyndon thickem he's been fighting for
his constituents for years but never
more than
he has during this crisis of inaccurate
data and lack of accountability
he has a message of hope and
encouragement that we hope you'll find
refreshing in an elected official
welcome senator
great it is so good to be here um and um
yeah we'd love for you to just speak on
a way for people
to you know no longer feel so
disconnected and powerless
what can they do to get involved in
their state
well it's interesting the first thing
people have to do is they actually have
to choose to get involved
a lot of people are watching today and
they're already part of this
and they're already involved and
regaining their respective freedoms
but many other people are curious just
how in the world do we get started
and then when you mix that in uh with
the evolution across the respective
states
and the myriad of different
circumstances that individuals will find
themselves in
it becomes quite a mix we all
are individuals we live in separate
communities some of us can find
like-minded groups and neighbors and
trade associations even political
parties
or elected officials and the most
important thing people can do
is reach out step up and get into this
mix because existing health policies
will be changed in the upcoming
legislative agendas across
all 50 states these items about medical
freedom
are on our doorstep and so the best
thing I can offer
to people is some insight some
principles that come from
our founding fathers and one of these
little quotes is
the price of freedom is eternal
vigilance
and by vigilance I mean you have to stay
alert you have to be careful you have to
watch for possible dangers
difficulty deceit and even betrayal and
it's an eternal quest it's one of these
things that
implies you have a duty and a
responsibility
an obligation and we're in it for the
long haul
and so people um have to kind of gird
themselves and this is a mental choice
that has to happen in their own hearts
and minds
and they have to choose to be involved
and
get ready for the information that we're
about to present today
because it's really quite mind-boggling
to see the amount of
corruption deceit misdirection and so
forth
that has been perpetrated by state
agencies and federal agencies
and so I look forward to participating
in this
conversation today wonderful thank you
so much senator
next we have dr james lyons wheeler who
is just a wonderful molecular geneticist
and expert on pcr
he's an award-winning author captivating
lecturer prodigious researcher I mean
he's got
incredible credentials and we are just
so happy you're here today
welcome dr jack thank you so much sarah
and I want to say hello to all the other
panelists and
it's an honor to be part of this thank
you I was hoping you could give us a
quick overview
to a question so many people have today
can the current pcr test tell if someone
is
infectious look the problem with using
pcr has been with us from the very
beginning
in um in february
cdc declined he adopted a test that
141 other countries adopted they
developed their own tests and shipped it
out as found to be flawed and that set
the united states back
two months in getting a reasonable
contact tracing and testing and then
the commercial entities were brought
online however
uh there must be so many people
colleagues of mine around the country
people that do pcr quantitative pcr
across the country that are just pulling
their hair out
hearing about this ct threshold
specifically as if there's one ct
threshold that can magically be used
for all the different kinds of pcr tests
for all of
the uh different levels of viremia
person might have the amount of viruses
and my initial inquiry into this found
that the cdc was talking about
talking out both sides of their mouth
they're saying that the test was too
sensitive
by dialing up the ct ct level all the
way up to
as high as 40 uh you're guaranteed a
high sensitivity
but you don't have specificity and the
fda never required
empirical estimation of specificity
that's the ability to not find the virus
when it's not there
or even the fragment of the virus later
on I'm going to go into great technical
detail and break down in high detail
exactly why the cdc should not and no
one should be using pcr at all
but I just want to uh end this little
segment here by saying that the college
of american pathologists
put out a publication saying it's not
reproducible there's too many factors
that affect the results
touch variation from test to test and
that it's not
fit for purpose dr singhang lee
published a thirty percent false
positive rate basil at all
in australia published 11
false positive rate and other
independent researchers looking at the
false positive rate
of quantitative prp rtpcr
report 20 to 50 percent and I was just
a witness in allegheny county in
pennsylvania near pittsburgh
where the state epidemiologist actually
put it in her writing in her written
testimony
uh and then testified orally that
there's zero false positives in the pcr
test
it's outs it's stunning the amount of
misinformation that's out there
take your time with pcr learn how it
works as
technically as technically as you can
it's not so complicated that people can
understand it look up videos of pcr
and how it works it's fascinating I run
pcr I used to teach it
it's not so complicated that we can't
get it right
that's amazing thank you so much for
that and listeners will be
learning a lot more about the
implications of this
uh wide margin of error if you will as
far
as the stats that emerged and of course
policy built upon that
our final panelists will be dr
henry ely he's a naturopathic doctor
minister teacher
author of over 200 publications
regarding evidence-based nutrition
and natural medicine he's invested over
three thousand hours of research
and leads a team of volunteers with over
twenty thousand collective hours of
investigation
into every aspect of covid available for
scientific review
dr ely is the lead author of the
peer-reviewed research paper
covid19 data collection comorbidity and
federal law
this is a must read and it's also he's
also the author of an upcoming
peer-reviewed research paper covid19
restoring public trust during a public
health crisis
welcome dr ely how are you doing say
it's so good to see you and be on this
show
oh it's such an honor truly I've been uh
really familiarizing myself with your
work and it's just
such an inspiration of course we
wouldn't be doing this here today if it
weren't for your work
uh can you can you briefly tell our
viewers how your team
figured out that the covet data was
being manipulated
uh well first of all I'm blushing a lot
thank you so much for the high praise
um I i think uh we started on
march 12th of last year uh that's where
we began our investigation we wanted to
understand what we could expect
so that we could do public service
announcement announcements for everybody
and just
keep people really calm because there
was so much fear going on so
we looked at the italian data data from
the italian ministry of health
we looked at the south korean data from
their cdc and we started to really
analyze
that data and our first clue when we
started to overlay the bell curves
sayer was the anomaly spikes in cases
here in the united states something
wasn't matching up so we said we got to
look deeper
state by state so then we had a major
breakthrough
when we went and we looked at and found
a huge variance
in fatalities between what the u.s was
saying
excuse me the cdc was saying for for the
u.s
specifically in the state of new york
and what the new york state department
of health was saying
so on april 30th the cdc was reporting
5 306 more fatalities than the new york
state department of health
and that number is only grown as of
yesterday that number is now
8496 the cdc for the state of new york
is reporting 8496 more fatalities than
the new york state department of health
so we wanted to know which number could
we trust which number
was right so curiously at the bottom of
the cdc's previous
website on covet tracking they had a
little link
to an april 15 document that document
was a position paper that they had
adopted
from the council of state and
territorial epidemiologists
and it was incredibly poorly conceived
in my
professional opinion there were very
loose criteria for diagnosis
they allowed the same person to be
counted over and over and over again as
new cases
but more importantly it was adopted by
the cdc without public comment
without peer review and without
notification in the federal register
which are required by federal law we
didn't know that at the time but our
research
ultimately led us there so at this point
we're super shocked right
and you know all this information is
hiding in plain sight
the data was clearly compromised and no
one at the state and federal level
seemed to care because we reached out to
them and we were trying to get them to
correct it but
nobody got back to us we were just
dismissed so we couldn't believe
that the cdc would outsource the
criteria for what constitutes a covet
case
you know to a non-profit organization
the council of state and territorial
epidemiologists they're not a federal
organization so we're like
something doesn't smell right so that
made us dig even deeper and it only
ultimately brought us to the cdc's
publication of the covid alert number
two document
that completely changed death
certificate reporting
but only for covet 19 and again without
public comment peer review or
notification
in the federal register as required by
federal law
so just to give everybody a background
for the previous 17 years all changes to
data collection
were first reported to the federal
register for oversight and public
comment that's the law
for the previous 17 years for all causes
of death death certificate reporting
was very different and under complete
discretion of the attending healthcare
professional it wasn't under the cdc
telling them what to do
but now with covid they're being told
what to do
they were being told to emphasize covid
even without a confirmed lab test
they were being told to simultaneously
de-emphasize chronic
comorbid pre-existing conditions that we
knew from the italian data and the south
korean data played a huge role
in patient outcomes and what we later
learned
was that these changes in death
certificate reporting were financially
incentivized to encourage compliance
something dr
scott jensen from minnesota senator out
of minnesota has
was vilified for and then ultimately he
was it was found to be accurate
everything he had said so
what we're hearing now sayer is that
public health officials keep
saying that minority communities are
being disproportionately impacted I just
read it on espn today
but what that implies is that covet is
impacting us
more than that then and that's just not
accurate
it's not accurate to say that covet is
impacting
minority communities more what's
accurate is to say that our communities
have a higher incidence of comorbid
conditions
because we're in a worse state of health
because that is due to systemic
socioeconomic educational health care
inequalities
these are things that are beyond dispute
and it's been going on for hundreds of
years
the sars cove ii virus air doesn't care
what color your skin is
it cares how little vitamin d you have
it cares how little vitamin c you have
it cares how little vitamin a and zinc
you have in your body to fight it
the sars cove ii virus is just another
opportunistic infection that preys upon
people who are nutritionally deficient
which tells us exactly what we need to
help everyone in our country
so by this point with everything that
we've researched
we know something is very wrong and
when we have inaccurate public health
narratives supplanting real science our
concerns skyrocket sayer so
we wrote a series of investigative
research papers we got the fourth one
peer review that's what we're going to
talk about today we got a fifth one on
the way and
tell you the truth we can't wait to get
started wow
thank you so much for that dr ely it's
uh incredibly inspiring
to you know witness yourself and all the
panelists today you know
put themselves on the line in this way
just dedicated to
you know providing the public accurate
information
despite political fallout and you know
your work
that paper really just blew my mind as I
know many of the
viewers when you take a look at you know
the two papers you put together
it really does show that what we
predicated an entire national lockdown
upon
and all of these interventions that are
so devastating
including social isolation or slash
distancing and mask wearing
what you're doing is helping to return
us to
basis of sanity and of course that is
what this event is all about
is making that information available um
would you have anything else to
contribute before we move on to the
round table just real quick say I
agree with you and I want everybody
watching this to be very clear our
intention is to collaborate
with public health officials our
intention is to collaborate with good
people in the cdc there are good people
in the cdc there are good people in
state health departments
there are good people at the county
levels and doctors out there we want to
collaborate with you and get this
information out
if we can put all this in for all this
money behind promoting
the experimental biologics we can
promote vitamin d
as well it just it just makes sense
doesn't it
absolutely I mean all we're asking for
is that the
laws that were already in place federal
law
was basically not observed or violated
and in this case
the implication was it affected the
lives of tens of millions
in a significantly adverse way so this
is a
true call for sanity clarity and also
cooperation
among those individuals that are paid by
the taxpayer
and some who are elected that are
supposed to be watching out for the
public health so we are partnering with
those individuals as well
not necessarily in opposition to them so
once again
thank you so much for your contribution
so we will be starting next with
our first round table which will involve
dr martin
anna garner senator senator uh lintichum
and we will be starting here
with dr martin now dr martin we were
reviewing your dossier on dr falchi and
some very concerning historical events
began to show up
how long have you been investigating the
events that led up to kobe 19
and the timeline you've constructed what
events and facts have stood out to you
as illegal
so if you wouldn't mind telling us about
that
yeah well my organization mcam has been
monitoring all of the potential
and actual violations of biological and
chemical weapons research
since 1999 we began that investigation
and in 1999 we were alerted to a very
interesting
problem which was a problem that was
conducting research that was
specifically targeting
amplifying the pathogenicity of beta
coronaviruses
there was a specific objective in the
research that was going on from 1999 to
2002
which was actually quite alarming and
resulted ultimately in a patent issued
to the university of north carolina
chapel hill
that patent covered the specific
applications
of modifying properties of coronavirus
so that it infected
human lung tissue and that
particular problem predates as you know
the first stars outbreak
by a year so ironic that
we went for potentially you know
tens of thousands of years with
beta-corone viruses which were
nothing more than a slight inconvenience
we start manipulating that virus
and within a very short period of time
we find ourselves
with sars outbreak 1.0
and then something far worse happened
in 2003 after the asian outbreak
of the first round of the sars disease
the
severe acute respiratory syndrome
disease a series of patents were filed
by the
united states center for disease control
and prevention and
ironically they had already published
the genome
of sars coronavirus and it was in the
public domain
but over the objections
twice of the patent office who
invalidated the application twice
the cdc ultimately in 2007 received a
patent on the genome of sars coronavirus
and its detection and its treatment
what was equally alarming was during
that same period of time
university of north carolina chapel hill
and others continued their work on
amplifying the pathogenicity of this
particular virus and it made no sense
that we would actually go down the
pathway of taking
a viral model and amplifying the harm
that it could do to humans
in research environments and then being
surprised that sometimes it showed up as
harming humans
um that didn't feel like that odd of a
thing and then
then an alarming thing happened so in
2003 we published a report that was sent
to law enforcement intelligence agencies
around the world
to highlight this risk and in that
report we actually made reference to the
fact that this was not just a u.s risk
but a chinese risk
we made a series of published reports we
presented those to
organizations around the world and then
a very alarming thing happened
and and this was an event in february of
2016.
this is after we recognized that the
national science foundation
had instituted a moratorium on gain of
function research this was after
all of the federal funding for gain of
function research
was actually put under that moratorium
peter dascheck of eco health alliance
who we all
have now come to know and love as as the
guy who funneled
several million dollars of u.s taxpayer
dollars to the wuhan institute of
virology
made the following statement and I'm
quoting from
2016. he said we need to increase public
understanding of the need for medical
countermeasures
such as a pan influenza and pan
coronavirus vaccine
this is 2016. he then said a key
driver and this is a quote a key driver
is the media
and the economics will follow the hype
I want to just recite that quote one
more time just so it sinks in
this is the guy who by the way just
recently led a world health organization
investigation
into whether or not we actually know
where this patent
this sar cov2 virus came from in china
that guy made this statement
a key driver is the media and the
economics will follow the hype
we need to use that hype to our
advantage to get to the real issues and
he went on to describe what the real
issues were which are the establishment
of a protocol
to get a pan coronavirus vaccine that
was in 2016.
during the exact same period of time the
wuhan institute of virology viral
model was published in a proceeding that
was
senior authored by ralph barrick that
said that the coronavirus in wuhan was
poised for human emergence once again in
2016.
so these are not 2019 pieces of data
this is 2016
and the model they used was actually a
model that mimics
a hundred percent of the co-vid symptoms
in chinese patients in 2012 and 2013.
so what we call covid19 and what we call
sars parentavirus is where we have to
make sure that we are careful in this
conversation like in every other
conversation
because in february when the world
health organization made its declaration
that there was a novel coronavirus which
in and of itself
is somewhat illusory there are multiple
models of multiple variants and multiple
mutations
but when they said that there was a
novel virus that was a false statement
and then they said that there was a
novel disease called
covid19 that was also a false statement
in fact all of the clinical
presentations
that are currently listed as covid19
clinical presentations were seen
in china in patients from whom the wuhan
virus
was isolated in 2013 and 2014
and was chimerically altered in 2016 at
the university of north carolina chapel
hill
so there is not a single thing about
what we've been told is
novel or new that is either
novel or new and most problematic
the causal statements that gave rise to
every declaration of a state of
emergency across this country and around
the world
is based on a false premise and that
false premise very simply states
that sars cov2 causes
covid19 now let's get really precise on
what that means
that means that there's a causality
relationship that's what that
word very simply means the tiny problem
was
and remains that the presence of the
virus does not beget symptoms
in many if not most individuals exposed
to some fragment of the virus
so the causality argument is not
supported by the data
but more problematic many patients
who were classified as having covid19
had no biochemical assessment of any
kind
forget rt pcr or any other diagnostic
procedure they actually were counted as
having coven 19
purely on clinical presentation alone
now
what makes that a problem is that
despite all of their
assertions or assertions to the contrary
the biggest problem we have right now
is that when the cdc fights on whether
or not covet is
over counted or under counted what they
conflate
is the viral test and the actual
clinical presentation of disease
and what we are led to believe is that
somehow or another everybody who's
exposed
somehow to a positive test
is somehow also infected or
harmed in a clinical sense and the
problem with the data
is that those two things the world
health organization in february
made a public statement saying that we
should not in public
conflate these two things and then from
that day forward
every governor every public health
officer everybody who is
part of the cdc data promulgation
the covid tracking project which is
funded by michael bloomberg
bill gates and the zuckerberg foundation
all of these organizations have
willfully conflated
this notion of viral exposure to the
clinical symptoms associated
with covid19 so our concern is very
simple
this was actually a commercial venture
when it started
it was controlled centrally by the cdc
and the national institutes of health
and ultimately the department of health
and human services they are the
financial beneficiaries
and their colleagues and their
commercial partners are the ones
profiteering
on the back of the manipulation of this
information
thank you dr martin uh miss garner what
do you think about what you
just listened to I think it's rather
shocking
and it's consistent with the information
that we had learned
about our lawsuits we know that
this has been in the making for a very
long time
uh not only have they misrepresented
that this was a novel virus
and a novel disease but they have
misrepresented that
that that there's a pandemic they have
misrepresented that there is a public
health emergency that require
all of these drastic measures like
lockdowns
and school closures and business
closures and the like uh
they've also what they've also done is
really um
distort plain and ordinary meaning of
words
they call a positive pcr test a case or
an infection
they say covid related dance they say
you know all of this is designed to just
incite fear and hysteria amongst the
public
and this is exactly what's been done
they also
you know we know that there was an event
201 in october of 2019
that was pandemic preparedness put on by
the world economic forum
and the bill and melinda gates
foundation and that also implicated
dr fauci and some of his groups so we
know that this has been in the works for
a long time
they predicted it they said it would
happen and it did happen and we need to
get
underneath the narrative in the story
and expose this for what it is
so thank you thank you for that
senator uh what do you think all about
this
well yeah the information that dr
martin presented is quite alarming and
it shines a bright light on potential
immoral and unethical actions that have
been taken by governments and
bureaucrats and powerful well-money
corporations
yet at the heart of it it should be
obvious that a real problem
stems from bureaucrats and status
politicians
these are the individuals who create and
manage
and promote public policy and they've
been
effectively hiding their true objectives
and
masking their policies keeping the
public in
the unsuspecting public in the dark was
this done by
accident was it an honest mistake is it
the result of endless appetite for
status or notoriety or
probably personal gain in particular
what we
just heard from dr martin and this is
why we are here today
is there exists the very real policy
the very real possibility that public
health
has been compromised and public health
has been harmed
by government corruption these powerful
corporations and influential people have
created a turbulent environment
for everybody in the marketplace for
policy makers for bureaucrats for
individuals who have been caught in
lockdowns
and in so doing they have potentially
violated their responsibility
under the information quality act by
enriching stakeholders themselves
and their political puppets or
corporations
this is a big big deal and dr martin has
plenty more than his little five minutes
here in this uh episode and I suggest
you go to his
website to see all the details
thank you so much for that senator uh dr
martin
what encouragement and advice can you
give our viewers
well I think one of the most important
things to do is and
and obviously the reason why I'm sharing
my evening with with all of you is
for a very simple reason 

This is not a unique situation.
Being informed is absolutely essential. The
idea of participating in any democratic system
anywhere on Earth requires education and that 
requires the capacity to make independent inquiry.

One of the things that I find most alarming
is the degree to which we are being asked to accept 
or believe information because it's fed to us by a
headline or by a public health official or by
someone who's standing behind a lectern.

My goal has always been -- and has been throughout the
last now 20 plus years -- my goal is to actually help 
people find the sources of information to make their
own informed decision. 

So if I had one take away from this it's 
make sure you source information to inform yourself,
number one. But number two and equally important,
be very aware of the fact that we've identified seven 
additional pathogens for which this exact template has 
been queued.  So this is actually not a lone event.
This is actually something for which a model is being 
built and tested and it is incumbent on us to understand 
that that needs to be disrupted before more harm is done.

thank you so much for
that and
fellow panelists uh this has been such a
helpful
uh explanation for an alternative motive
for what otherwise would
appear to be a wild or natural
event and I think that's essentially
what people are looking for is the type
of
historical information and context
that you're providing here so we can
really make
informed decisions without which consent
is not
possible and that is a fundamental
medical ethical principle
that we absolutely we need to
have access to as free uh
individuals our next round table will be
dr ely dr jack and commissioner
us starrett so we are going to start
with dr early
your team's peer-reviewed research paper
is a focal point for this event
and for our call to action at the end of
the event
how did this paper come into being how
accurate is the fatality data being
reported by our public health
authorities and the media
well sarah thank you for those questions
first of all how did this come into
being it came into
being because good people asked
questions
and didn't take a narrative for the
answer and as we
kept asking questions we kept connecting
we kept
asking other people to verify what we
had found
we made sure attorneys verified it we
made sure scientists verified it we made
sure
colleagues verified it doctors licensed
doctors we
made sure that what we were saying was
accurate before we came out with it
because the way something like this
comes about is when people come together
and care that's what happens so
what I want to share with everybody uh
is a quick
um a quick look at some information some
screenshots that I think is
is going to be uh very telling
so the first thing I want to do is
substantiate what I had said earlier
that
as of february 16th there is a variance
of 8496 fatalities
between what the cdc is reporting for
the state of new york and you can see
the screen capture right here and what
the
new york state department of health is
reporting for total fatalities folks
I got you have to understand this cannot
happen
a variance of 10 15 fatalities between
the cdc and a state sure
right because the way it's supposed to
work is the counties report to the state
the state reports to the cdc
but when you have a growing variance
over
that has been going on since april 30th
that has now reached 8496
it calls into question your ability to
do something very simple
basic math right it calls into question
how does this take place why is there
such a variance I still don't have an
answer to that today
other than to say it's wrong when we
look at the cdc's data all the data I'm
about to share with you comes directly
from the cdc's data tracker
here are the number of cases per age
demographic one of my
big things that I've been screaming
about sayer is we have to stop
looking at this as aggregate data across
for everybody we have to look at this
based upon age
stratification we have to look at this
in the 0 to 17 age range
where we've had in over a year 298 total
fatalities a fatality rate of 0.013
percent which means that
the estimated recovery rate for our kids
is 99.987 percent
in the in the age 18 to 49 range we
apparently have and I'm going to start
saying apparently based upon what dr
martin just shared
we apparently have 11 million cases but
only 15 000 fatalities for a fatality
rate of 0.14
percent again this is the cdc's own data
folks that makes a recovery rate an
estimated recovery rate of 99.859
percent all right and it's and it's
still held even
all the way through the 50 to 64 age
demographic our problem demographics
have been have always been age 65 to 74
and 75 and older and we knew that sayer
all the way back
as early as march 9th when the cdc
published a
a statement through cnbc.com
we've known that our most at risk
weren't going to be because of a
person's skin color or ethnicity
but it was going to be because of age
and comorbid conditions
and it's played out in the data and it's
been playing out in the data
I can't wrap my head sayer around the
idea
I can't wrap my head around the idea
that for everybody
under 65 years of age they have a
recovery rate of 99.623 percent
but for some reason we can't be bedside
next to the people we love when they're
hospitalized my cousin was just
hospitalized last night and his woman
couldn't be
by his bedside when he was recovering
from a
seizure and they asked him medical
related questions and he had to give
answers after coming out of a seizure
it's unconscionable
sayer for that to happen and it just
happened last night
now what I want to share with everybody
watching is this
there was a document the nvss covid
19 alert number two because I'm going to
take some heat on this I already know I
am right speaking out you're going to
take some heat but this is the document
that
changed how certificate of death
reporting occurred
okay and this was issued on march 24
2020 last year
published by the cdc on behalf of the
nvss the nvss is a
national vital statistics system what
they wanted to do
was they wanted to tell their their
death certifiers
what coveted will covet 19 be the
underlying cause
the underlying cause depends on what and
where conditions are reported on the
death certificate
however the rules for coding and
selection of the underlying cause of
death are expected
to result in coven 19 being the
underlying cause more often than not
isn't that a little quinky dink right
and here's this other thing
should covet 19 be reported on the death
certificate only with a confirmed test
the answer for most of us doctors is
yeah
but look at their answer here sayer
coven 19 should be reported on the death
certificate for all decedents where
the disease caused or is assumed to have
caused or contributed to death really
assumed
certifiers should include as much detail
as possible based upon their knowledge
of the case medical records
laboratory testing etc if
the decedent had other chronic
conditions such as copd or asthma
that may have also contributed these
conditions can be reported in part two
sayer here's the big deal about that
that is not the way that was done for
the previous 17
years comorbid pre-existing conditions
were always
tracked in part one not part two big big
change right there
this should have been reported to the
federal register this
should have been open for public comment
we should have had an
opportunity to review this and say hey
there's some problems with this
this guidance you're you're issuing
right here it's not going to work for
these reasons
but we weren't afforded that opportunity
they just pushed it through
so I want to show your I want to show
your your audience right here
I want to show them a covet 19
death certificate versus a influenza h1
in one death certificate if everything's
the exact same
if the person is the same the only
difference is covet 19 versus h1n1 you
ready for this there
if we look on the left we see that a
person
70 who 77 year old male 10 year history
of hypertension
and chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease copd
and then he passes away due to coven 19.
they're going to list acute respiratory
acidosis for three days and covet 19 for
one week
and then the things that really
contributed to his death that
were the causative uh factors for his uh
demise
they're gonna put down here in part b
and and de-emphasize him
but if that same guy sayer that same 77
year old male
died instead of covid inf
he died from influenza h1n1 look at how
different
his cause of death his death certificate
is going to look it's going to look like
cardiac arrest resulting from acute
respiratory acidosis
hypertension is going to be mentioned in
part one copd is going to be mentioned
in part one
and then h1n1 can be still being part
one it's what's called
in the uh in the handbook that the cdc
publishes an initiating factor
okay but most doctors would actually put
it in part two because they
understand well he's 77
he had multiple comorbidities
h1n1 didn't kill him it was
the pre-existing conditions that played
a larger role in his negative outcome
and that's but that's been taken away
sayer from
our our medical professionals our
coroners our
our medical examiners are our physicians
it's been taken away from them by this
document this previous document here
and saying it's got to be coveted and
here's really the thing that gets my
gills
say here they were financially
incentivized
to do it that's the part that's
unethical
and unacceptable so what I'm going to
take some heat on
and I'm ready to take the heat on it
okay but what I'm going to take some
heat on
is this graphic right here that's
starting to make the national rounds
okay I'm glad we're having the
conversation
i'm just glad we're finally talking
about this really sayer okay
because if we had used the
guidelines that we had been using
without any problems for the previous 17
years
for these death certificate coding if we
had just used
if we had just used those our assertion
is that
the total fatality count due to covid19
caused by covet 19 would be roughly
about 21 000
americans instead of the 348
000 that the cdc is publishing in their
provisional accounts which is all I go
to I don't go to their other ones
because
they can't even get basic math right for
the state of new york
so I can't trust that does that make
sense right I can't trust that
so what we're saying here is this how
many
deaths were caused by covid we don't
know and that's a problem
how many deaths did kovitt contribute to
we don't know
and that's a problem how many deaths
were due to core morbidities initiated
by the tsar's covetous virus we don't
know and that's a problem
so what we and and to throw a no another
monkey wrench in the monkey wrenches we
don't
know now after december 13th how many of
these fatalities
involve the covid experimental vaccines
which are still in phase 3 clinical
trial according to the nih
right we don't know these things so we
have this incredibly muddied waters
um we need ser an independent audit
of all death certificates and we have
we my team has put together a formula
where we can incorporate
the medical history the ct values from
any pcr testing
and we can organize these into three
distinct categories
people who died due to covid people who
died
because of a covet involvement but due
to
comorbid conditions and people who are
just
miscategorized completely and likely
because of its financial incentives
and co and say or just a final thought
on this
you know we have there we have laws for
a reason
the information quality act the
paperwork reduction act
the administrative procedures act we
have we have these things for a reason
because when we don't follow these laws
data gets compromised and people die as
a result
people suffer as a result and it's got
to stop
enough suffering it's got to stop wow
thank you so much for that summarization
this
was the primary reason why when those
new codes came out and there they
removed the requirement for testing for
virus
and just suspicion was all that was
required to
label someone dead from covid that
I also I was shocked and to see you come
through
with your colleagues to produce this
paper and now
shed all the factual light and shed
light on the
legal uh violations if you will that
made that happen
it's just so so appreciated uh
commissioner as an elected official what
do you think about what you just
listened to
thank you sir well I do appreciate dr
ely's work and it certainly opened my
eyes
I think the most important thing I I
would take away from this
is if we remember to work with the
willing that we're seeing more and more
coalitions of people from
all different political perspectives
coming together to ask some questions
because they're saying
something just isn't right it doesn't
feel right and even on that level we can
then start to look for the information
when we get the information presented to
us then we can start to take action
and the biggest thing that people can
have to remember
is that there has to be that consistent
process that dr early just mentioned
it can't be selective and it can't be
pick and choose when you want to follow
the process
it needs to be followed and there needs
to be accountability and transparency
and that's where your elected officials
need to be held accountable
for following those processes that are
in statute and in law
thank you so much commissioner dr jack
i'm sure you have a lot to add
from an ethical and scientific
perspective like what concerns about
this
do you have if it's proven true right so
back to the question about how this all
came about
through networking I came to to
understand that dr ely and colleagues
had some
compelling results that they just
couldn't understand they weren't making
any sense out of it and I invited the
paper
to the journal science public health
policy and the law
as editor-in-chief this is not my first
stint as editor-in-chief I founded the
journal cancer informatics
and I was associate editor of applied
bioinformatics
I serve on numerous editorial boards on
a number of
scientific journals I served for a long
time on the journal cancer research a
very
uh feather in my cap I'm very proud of
that service that I conducted
and today I peer reviewed two papers and
journals you'll probably never hear
about
I put a lot of time and effort and
energy into making sure that the science
that goes forward is validated
it's vetted it's looked at as dr ely
suggested by experts I sent the paper
out for blinded
peer review to this day dr ely and
colleagues have no idea
who reviewed his paper and in fact the
peer review standards
of the journal science public health
policy meet or exceeds those
of journals like the new england journal
of medicine
so it's although it's not registered as
just was reported today
in usa today with pubmed and these kinds
of organizations
that's because we don't yet have the
steam pubmed has a particular pace of
publication that we're not up to
and we also only publish by invitation
and there's a good reason for that now
if somebody has a problem with dr
riley's paper
and think there's something wrong with
that analysis you can contact me
and submit your own re-analysis and I'll
put it out to peer review just like his
that's called rational discourse but
here's my assessment
I understand the thousands of hours that
all of us are putting into this
right so dr ely's doing research on this
i'm doing my own independent research on
this and
when we get to my slides I think that's
in the next round table right or do I do
it now
um next round table next one um
when when when we're doing this kind of
research right
we have to understand that we're
guessing at motivation
so I might differ a little bit with dr
martin respectfully
deeply respectfully respect all the work
that he did on it I think cdc
shipped out the flawed test and by
shipping out the flawed test they
realized that the only way they had a
chance of getting hold of this was to
create the scenario where the
sensitivity of the test was
100 they have to catch every case every
time they test it
right but they forgot and I believe they
totally forgot that when the prevalence
is low
when you do that you ramp up the false
positive rate it's done at a cost to
sensitivity there's a
there's a seesaw effect the more that
you test
at the beginning because you have small
numbers of cases and you're doing
contact racing that's fine
but my other analysis and peer review
and other journals show that when you do
this kind of thing
and you change to indiscriminate testing
and you start testing anybody
any day just because you want to test
them when the prevalence is low you end
up with
way too many false positives and so then
you start start shutting down society
it all goes back to cdc making the
mistake of shifting and shipping out
that flawed test
in their rush right they came up with a
brand new way of dealing with this that
was never been seen before
i've been fact checked the fact checking
websites have it wrong
yes this paper has been fact checked dr
elie
and colleagues did in fact identify
substantial word differences
between what was happening before calvin
19 and after in terms of
uh attribution of not just attribution
of death but diagnosis of
of disease as well so remember
dr deborah burks in april made the
announcement that contrary to how
other countries are doing it cdc is
going to count
died with as died from
no matter what they died from literally
a blanket
a blanket determination of death as if
we have one
coroner working in the united states one
person determining the cause of death
across all states all counties all
deaths
if you have a positive result on your
test and you die
you died from coving now put on on top
of that that the false positive rates
might be as high as 11
or 20 or 50 percent then we have a real
problem it's a technical problem it can
be reversed
and we're seeing that the world health
organization said yeah oops
january 21st the world health
organization said yes
we dialed it up too high with ct's this
high we're going to have to dial it back
the department of health of the state of
kansas now has said it we're going to
dial it back we're going to bring these
universal seed
it's still the wrong approach you're
supposed to use a negative control
every patient every time calculate the
ct for that patient
and then calculate the negative control
ct and take the difference it's called
delta ct
it blows my mind that we're not seeing
delta delta ct
or delta ct in the literature we're
seeing a single threshold that doesn't
make any sense clinical whatsoever
so that's what went wrong in my opinion
they set the dial to 100
sensitivity they gave us a bunch of
false positives and then they're like
okay well you know what we're doing in
the name of good
we don't want to miss any because the
cost of the false negatives
are so high this thing will get away
from us they forgot about the cost of
the false
positives they forgot about the suicides
the deaths of despair
the hundreds of thousands of businesses
that have been shut down
the the teen suicide rate is an
unacceptable public health tragedy right
now in the united states of america
and unless until we have a a bear all
cdc come clean and say you know what
you're right
dr lionsweiler has it right we did it in
the in out of the best interest of the
country and we made a mistake
now we can start putting the country
back together but are they going to do
it
I doubt it it's the perverse incentives
that dr martin talked about
that places them in a position where
they should not be responsible for our
public health
anymore that's why I've created plan b
plan b is a decentralization b
depolitization
and de-incentivization of public health
in the united states
look up my name look up hashtag plan b
and
you'll see that I i want a big serious
sea change in the united states
amazing dr jack I also took a look at
your plan b I encourage
everyone to read this document I mean
you've provided a solution to this
systemic
problem that we're identifying today
thank you so much
uh dr ely what encouragement and advice
do you give
our viewers they're listening well
um I i I think number one is um
don't believe fact checkers fact
checkers are just opinions
you know masquerading as as we know
everything
the only way to fact check our work is
to do an independent audit of every
single death certificate and get it
proper get them properly categorized and
we
welcome that I will I will drive
fly swim to dc if you need me to
participate in that
anybody listening at the cdc I will do
it I'll be there
because we want to get this right we
need if you're going to make good
decisions my dad drilled this into me
for my whole life son if you need if
you're going to make good decisions you
need to make have accurate data most
people can't add sun and you need to
know how to add
dad you're right I'm I you were right
about all this that's why we're
that's why we're here right because we
need that accurate data
um so I would say if you want to fact
check me
i'm with you let's fact check it by
getting an
independent audit of every single death
certificate with medical history with
the company
our pcr cts and when they got a positive
single
signal for it get let's get all that
data and get it right because we need to
get it right because this can never
happen again thank you so much for that
absolutely we're asking for
transparency we're asking that our
federal
agencies do their job that they're
tasked
with and that's all it's very simple so
thank you so much panelists
we're going to move to round three and
this is going to include dr bregen
superintendent fieldman and of course
commissioner starrett
and we are going to start with dr bregen
thank you welcome back here
it seems undeniable at this point that
millions of people have become
trapped in a web of collateral damage
during covet 19.
you've been investigating this and
particularly the mental emotional
aspects what can you share
with us about what you've learned and
how bad it is in your professional
opinion
well I want to I'm not your ordinary
psychiatrist
i've spent a lot of time looking inside
the drug companies looking at the web
of organization around the world
and so I want to spend a few minutes
i'll divide up my time
and talk about the kind of material
that's in my
coronavirus website my coronavirus
resource center on my website
bregman.com
i've been involved with legal issues
around this virus I
I did a 120 page paper with hundreds of
references to
to start the ohio suit uh working with
wonderful uh uh tom rentz who's the
attorney doing that work so
I get called in like the ordinary
psychiatrist but there's a combination
here I also have a clinical practice
there's something missing from all the
analyses today and I've been uh
uh interested in it in a way it's
exciting because
what I spent all my time on in terms of
the causation here of where does this
start then start with cdc
it doesn't start with any of that
I be I first saw as uh
dr miller so clearly seen I'm sure
that uh all the early research a lot of
it
done in collaboration with china that's
the word we haven't heard
enough about today that we were actually
building viruses with china
so they were working in the wuhan land
we're working over here in north
carolina
and we're making deadly pathogenic
viruses with the chinese
we're funding them and you've heard some
of the sources of that
starting with fauci and um through
various other sources
and so I began to look at well why
why was nobody saying anything about
this we finally
went public on this blew the whistle on
it got the news up toward the trump
people
into the trump circle and he canceled
within two days of our coming out with
it
trump canceled the collaborations
between
fauci and china
he did not cancel the gain of function
research that we were still doing but he
saw the
china linkage immediately so we began
looking at all of the people who are
making money off of this
whether you look at a gates or a
bloomberg schwab
even the koch family if you look at the
top
16 billionaires
every one of them but one has deep
ties to china making a huge amount of
money in china
and is going to be participating in this
gigantic cover-up we've seen about the
origins of the virus
and because they're making so much money
from coveted 19
they don't want it to end they don't
want the cheap drugs coming in
they want the vaccine the vaccine the
vaccine they don't want even
they're not even that excited about
expensive drugs as much as expensive
vaccines
and the one thing they don't want is
cheap drugs
so who are all those other people if you
look at the
top companies that are shutting down
virus information
six companies twitter
facebook microsoft youtube google apple
they're all connected to china deeply
connected to china
they all are deeply connected to making
money off the virus
even the lancet is deeply involved
with who and and with china
protecting china they set up a
commission
to investigate china before who did and
they put the same
echo health guy on
that that who did um
so we've got the journals we've got the
agencies of all kind and they're deep
this all goes back to this connection
between the united states and china
and if you don't look into that if you
don't look how all these guys are
getting rich off china
anticipated the coming of the virus
that's been mentioned there's like four
or five six different ways they
they're out there saying we're going to
have a virus
in the years leading up to it they're
preparing to make a killing
on an epidemic
and they're also at the same time and I
can't exactly tell you why they're
all working with china so they're all
protecting china
and they're all dumping on the united
states of america
and since and this will be my last
sentence or two about this
america is a democratic republic
uh schwab one of these one of the big
thinkers in this whole area of the what
I call the globalist predators
has said in his newest book that a
democratic republic is incompatible with
globalism
but they find china to be very
compatible with globalism
so in the past year the last year of the
of the uh
2019 you have a a giant
conference everybody's there the
clintons are there I mean everybody's
there
and it's run by bloomberg and they hold
it in beijing
you've got to look at china because
otherwise you're spinning your wheels is
the this
huge collaboration but I'm calling the
global predators the corporations the
billionaires
they don't have any identification with
the united states
they don't care their identification is
power wealth self-aggrandizement
and they see it in china and china's
markets and china's power
so I wanted to add that this
conversation because I felt it would be
missing
now many of you yes go ahead go ahead I
have a few more minutes left
how much time do I have to talk about a
few few minutes is great
two or three yes uh many of you have
already spoken
as a psychiatrist and psychologists
about the terrible toll
I mean the the death rate among
adolescents from suicide is literally uh
way beyond that that they never get from
the cold environments they increase in
their suicides
um but I want to talk to you about an
underlying principle again
rather than all these different
diagnoses we have depression we've got
this going up we've got divorce going up
you know we have all this stuff the
thing that's being ignored
everywhere is that human beings are
social creatures
public health oddly enough does not take
it into account
the entire public health establishment
is not interested
in collateral damage to the social
fabric
of humanity and neither are incidentally
the global predators there's a lot in
common here that's happening in this
universe out there
in human beings we are so social that in
fact
everything we call mental illness is a
social phenome
it's either labeled socially or it
derives from
social suffering it doesn't come from
sitting by yourself it comes from
sitting by yourself when you want to be
with people
none of the diagnoses matter so what
we've done
by employing public health measures is
we've completely ignored
every form of social damage we shut down
the churches we shut down the schools we
live open the bars
so that people can be numb
human beings we are born unlike other
animals into entirely helpless state
we're born like fetuses literally quite
literally we can't walk
it's like you drag this out of a pouch
of
one of those bouncy creatures
from australia and then for a year we're
brought up our brain doubles in size
and it doubles in response to our social
life
so your brain is social
and we grow up needing social
relationships
social stimulation caring we need
love our deepest
the deepest I just published a paper
that was remarkably well appreciated on
what is the deepest common denominator
underneath all
basic kind of psychiatric psychological
suffering and it's a I believe it's a
belief that not worthy of love
which tales very well with the
judeo-christian tradition that
people don't feel worthy of love they
they need to feel
valuable and worthwhile and the public
health
people and fouchy and the absolute
disrespect of all the global predators
for humanity
has robbing humanity of its feeling that
it's worthwhile
serving of love deserving of meaning
deserving of caring
that's this huge destructive process and
it all goes back again
to the public health implementing what
the global predators want for us I want
to give you that big overview I hope
it's useful
it is thank you so much dr bregman it
does speak to the spiritual
crisis that many of us are facing due
again to the inappropriate
public health policies based on
distorted
if not absolutely false data thank you
uh commissioner um I'm actually it's
superintendent filming next
so you've been one of the few people
that have taken a stand on behalf of
our kids okay so what can you tell
parents watching about how you did it
and the positive impacts in person
education
has on every person including the
teachers
and if you have some stories to share
that you would like to
around this topic would be great
maybe a delay here do you hear me okay
mark
I don't think we can hear you right now
okay let's see mark can you hear us
okay let's um okay there you go hi mark
okay having trouble hearing you
um we might have a technical issue so um
I think jared will be addressing that
our sound support so I'll just
jump to commissioner um so
how what what response would you have to
what has been shared thus far
you know it's funny I always have to
start off with a comment about dr bregg
and he has no idea how much he's
influenced my
my uh my thinking I remember something
he said 30 years ago
and he said and this is from a
psychiatrist that mental illness is a
spiritual problem
and he was not saying it from any
particular religious discipline he was
saying that
just what he outlined is that there is a
need in all of us
to have that connection the social
connection the spiritual connection
and one of the first things we noticed
was done and I'm speaking about the
state
of oregon because every state is
different but but but uh pretty much the
macro
is that our churches were shut down our
schools were shut down
our restaurants were shut down our gyms
were shut down
these are the places where people find
connection you take that away
and you isolate them but our cannabis
shops were open our liquor stores were
open
and uh what was resumed was not was not
restaurant capacity now but was
was a video lottery so the way I look at
it is this we have to approach
each one of these and this is what we
did a number of resolutions
a number of lawsuits I testified in
federal court in portland
against the governor because of the
shutdown of the
of the of the the private schools and I
had heard a governor's spokesperson say
the reason we're doing this is because
if we open up the
private schools the faith-based schools
will see a mass exodus from the public
schools
so we use that in a case the case in
brooklyn
that allowed the churches to open
basically said any faith institution
including the faith-based schools
had to open and if we and based on that
the schools were
open and our our public schools are are
are still shut down because the teachers
unions are not interested in teaching
but what we do is we attack it from
resolutions
working with the trade organizations
like the restaurant associations
and we work on the local level we're
going we passed a resolution in december
which basically said we need accuracy
and coveted data
and we also are going to use this and as
a court validated process
whereby anybody who is shut down or
cited by a state
agency like uh oregon occupational
safety health association
will be able to use this in court as
cover
for uh being able to say hey listen
we've done everything we should do
we're not gonna be dinged for for the
covid uh citations
so we have another uh resolution that
i'm asking the board to pass
and that basically asks the governor to
uphold her pledge to support the
constitution
lifts orders restricting our local
businesses considers all our
independently owned businesses
as essential and we also ask that she
directs her state agencies like the
liquor control commission
and the oregon uh osha to uh
to cease her uh limiting their citations
to those infractions that were in place
before covid
so we're just basically going to
encourage our legislators to also
get active and start holding the
governor accountable for this overreach
from the executive branch
so you do what you can and you hit from
multiple perspectives
and that's what we do and our
constituents are grateful even though we
haven't been able to be effective
that's amazing thank you so much mary uh
mark are you uh
back online here okay yeah I had to have
a switch to sell I apologize for having
some internet trouble out here
rural america no problem
so go for it well a couple of things
uh you know when you see things like dr
breggin talking about some of the global
issues and who profits and who wins and
who loses
uh our story and I'll see is in a
microcosm we
we were ahead of the game as a small
school district
all our kids had devices and so we we
were
one of the first in oregon to switch to
the comprehensive distance learning
without even being told and then
um once we even though we did it very
well it
it was very clear that it was inadequate
so we made the decision to open
and every month the governor
kept changing the rules and she created
metrics that said nobody could open
and uh fortunately we reached out to our
legislators senator findley and senator
lipkum and others and uh they created
the royal exception
and we opened with all eyes on us on you
know we were the only full-time k-12
school open
we opened in august uh west of the
cascades for those who aren't familiar
with oregon
and uh we were able to show
through a whole bunch of mitigation and
safeguards that you could safely operate
schools
it is now february and we have still had
zero cases of code
that have been able to be in zero cases
period
uh no cases have been traced to uh being
sourced at the school
and yet most schools in oregon are still
closed
and uh just so everyone understands that
I finally said this to uh director colt
gill
just last week because uh ode is now
advising districts not to release
kids to
the school district either for our brick
and mortar for our online program
and I explained to him that's a
violation of rs338 we are not a virtual
charter school
and according to law kids cannot be
denied access to our programs and we're
in the middle of a pandemic
kids aren't being educated suicide rates
uh home stress
uh domestic violence I think we have uh
I think we need to keep the kids out
front
and I just kind of need melted face
like I want to serve kids even if we
don't get paid for them

Things are really bad out there and I got an email today saying, 
You can go ahead and serve them but you better not try to get 
paid for them. And this is from the [Oregon] Director of Education
and he is appointed by the governor.

Something is very, very wrong. I asked Director Gill, Why aren't we 
getting accolades in Alsea?  Why aren't we being praised as a
school that could—for all the good that we've done? On
the huge waiting list we have? The massive number of board members who
have come out to Alsea so they could see what it looks like to
open a school during covid safely?

I can go on and on but you know it goes back to what former speakers 
have talked about. It's counterintuitive that we wouldn't be held up 
as an example of what can be done. So I really want to encourage 
people: get connected and be active. My claim to fame, and probably the 
reason I was asked to be on this panel outside of running a school, was 
I started pushing back as Commissioner Starrett knows.

I started getting active and I wrote a letter
encouraging counties to open up because we had 
so many kids trying to harm themselves.
The hospitalization rate -- visits in the emergency room --
for students attempting suicide and then those those kids,
tying it back to not being in school, being isolated, being
stuck at home.

And I took it real personally. So I challenged the 
Oregon Health Authority Epidemiologist. Boy did I not know
what I was getting into. But I have a science background 
and I said, Look your data doesn't make sense.
As of October 20th we've got exponential number of cases
being identified but hospitalization rates are going down.
That's impossible. You cannot have a three-fold increase
in 10 days of covid identification cases and expect to see 
hospitalization rates going down.  

What I didn't realize and what came out of it was the
hospitalization data comes from a different source.
So the epidemiologist challenged me about stochastic analysis.
I said, Great. Where is it? I don't see it on your website. 

Then then he just got quiet and he said, Why are you doing this?  
I said, Listen, I'm being told I have to close my school
In January. We're heading into the winter break.
I'm trying to determine whether or not, under these metric rules,
I can stay open and I need good data to do that and I don't have it.
So the summation of that is I told him I said, Look you you go back
to OHA and report that Superintendent Thielmann needs to have his 
school open and he needs what we call “safe harbor” in 
Oregon which means we can stay open once we're open.
I said they've ended safe harbor.  I've asked them to extend it and 
if they extend safe harbor I'll get real quiet real quick.

Well, two hours later safe harbor was extended through an email
from Deputy Superintendent Colt Gill.  Serendipitously,
the next morning I'm driving to work and there was an Emergency OHA
announcement on the radio news, AM radio, that they think we're 
nearing the end of this most recent Covid spike as evidenced by
a reduction in hospitalization rates.
That's when I realized something's very, very wrong with that. 
That's impossible. You can't be a Superintendent, call in and 
do that and have it on the news the next day if the data is 
scientific, objectively rationally based.  It's not.

I'm upset because more kids—kids are suffering,
education is not getting done and we need to we need to really 
take a long look in the mirror and our political leaders and 
get back to what we're supposed to be doing and that is 
serving kids and families, being here as a state and federal 
government, serving the people by which those governments
exist to serve and not the other way around.

thank you so much for that for those
listening remember that this
data disaster has such profound
implications and here's a shining
example of a school that could
and your school where you live can as
well if we can only get this information
out and again the call
to action at the end of this broadcast
will enable you to be empowered to help
make that happen
um so dr bregen we're running a bit
behind but we'd love for you to
close this panel off with just telling
us how does this
make you feel to hear all of this and
what encouragement can you get
our viewers well the biggest
encouragement I want to give
has not been talked about again very
much so I want to point out
that we have a huge amount of
information on the early
treatment the prevention and early
treatment of covert 19.
so I want to give you some resources
real quick
um the association of american
physicians and surgeons
that's all you need to know you can even
go with aaps and google it
and they have a blue book right up there
in front
on the on the early treatment and
prevention
of covet 19 incredibly successful
uh it began with hydroxychloroquine
now there are other medications as well
they're all
cheap and the government doesn't want
cheap drugs going out to the folks so
you have to go to the to the people who
are really involved with that
and one of the doctors named mccullough
one is named solinko
um these are people you can find and
they're very
very important um
about the children I you know it's a
it's about treating all of us as was if
we're
objects in some you know consumer play I
mean the kids are consumers now they're
they're a market that's a better word
we've all been turned into a
market and the children is just awful
and now we're marketing vaccines to them
and we're going to do
that without any of the vaccines having
been tested on children I don't know if
anybody mentioned that before
vaccines have not been tested on
children but now we've gotten the okay
from the good old boys fda cdc whoever
found she was ever pulling the strings
and we're going to be
giving these kids mark you know these bp
wonderful kids
we should protect we'll be giving them
vaccines
I think that um we just have to get
another view of kids other than there
being a market for crappy videos and
violent movies and sex and uh
all the other uh stuff that I mean I
don't think I could grow up today I mean
a person is
full of you know stuff as I am I would
I would have been done in by just my own
over stimulation
with all the things our kids today have
to deal with
so our kids are in trouble and kovac 19
is just one more example of the way
we just use them to make money now
that's what the culture is doing it's a
partly the absence of religion I believe
it's partly the absence of
moral education our founders
said to have a democratic republic we
had to give
moral education to everybody to the
children especially everybody had to
read
and by moral education they also meant
the belief in freedom which we haven't
heard there may be enough about today
either
because they've taken away our freedom
and they were taking away the kids
freedom
they're turning us into a way to make
money this way and that
and it's um we got to look into that
very
big picture thank you so much dr bregman
exactly that's why we're doing this
event
and we are together providing a means
for
people to take back control of their
basic health rights and human
rights so again thank you panelists
we're gonna move on to
panel panel number four roundtable
number four uh including uh
anna gardner dr martin and senator
lynette
so we'll start with ms garner we've
known that you filed
impressive legal arguments in new mexico
ohio
and federally as well as suits against
the cdc
so many people are desperate to know
that something
and someone is bringing the legal
challenges
what can you tell us about the cases
you're currently working on
well the compromise data and the
misleading data is the thing that is
driving the suffering in
my state new mexico and that
that prompted me to start looking at
what the lawsuits what lawsuits were
happening around the u.s
and it wasn't until I saw tom renz's
lawsuit in ohio
which dr gregan mentioned working with
him and actually he
submitted a short affidavit in support
of the ohio lawsuit
and 

I started working with Tom. I called Tom and I said, Look I think you're on
the right track. Nobody else has figured this out yet except you and that 
is he knew that he had to attack the entire base of this narrative which 
is there is no public health emergency.
The way that we look at this is we're looking at all of the data 
that came in

How did this start?  They're basing this public health emergency on the 
fact that there were modeling assumptions made by the Imperial College 
of London that were just absolutely so far off the mark that they
were ridiculous. But what did they do? They instilled a whole lot of 
fear in a whole lot of people.  Millions of people are going to die,
Fauci said. Remember?

That started the whole cascade of false information that was being fed 
to all of the people who only get their information from mainstream news
or perhaps the newspapers. If that's the only place they get their 
information, they're going to be horribly misinformed. That's the beginning of it.

Then we have the cases and the covid-related deaths, and Dr Ealy covered 
that very, very well.  But the covid-related deaths in New Mexico—we have 
a population of 2.1 million approximately.
I just looked at the numbers on the New Mexico public department of health 
and they said that there are very close to 200,000 deaths in New Mexico 
due to covid. That is not correct. 

We've had a data analyst actually get 
copies of the death certificates and you can tell just
from the death certificates that they're miscoding them.
In his analysis he figured that only 15 percent of these deaths 
actually died with no co-morbidities or trauma. So obviously they're not 
looking at these things correctly at all. They know that they're
fake and they're scaring everybody into terrible isolation, fear, 
and depression.

we have we have uh fake numbers on cases
we have faith numbers on deaths
uh we these pcr tests nobody has really
come
out until this kind of uh event
come out and talked about how
meaningless and unreliable the pc
will you close your laptop
excuse me um so
uh anyway 

The PCR tests we know have a false positive rate of anywhere
from 70 to 90 percent depending on what sort of cycle thresholds are used,
depending on what reagents are used, there's so many variables.
And it appears that the PCR tests were also marketed under the Emergency Use
Authorization which means they didn't get tested
and they were created in the absence of a virus
being isolated that was claimed to have caused
this group of symptoms called covid.

So we have we have meaningless PCR test.
We have the whole myth of asymptomatic transmission
that was almost completely and conclusively
rebutted in the almost 10 million person study done in Wuhan.
There was zero — zero asymptomatic transmission
in this huge number of people. so that is not part of the uh
any bit of the truth that's driving this
public health emergency
and in fact that asymptomatic
transmission narrative
is driving a lot of very oppressive
measures
that are being done by the government
for example
mask wearing uh social distancing
isolation stay home stay home so that
everybody's safe uh you they're quarantining healthy people
they are claiming that healthy people
are now asymptomatic which implies that
we're all
walking germ vectors that's just not
true
you know I'm a healthy person pretty
much everybody I know is healthy in fact
I haven't known but
a couple of people who may have gotten
covered I haven't known anybody who's
died from
actually the disease I've known people
who got sicker from taking flu shots
so it's it's just it's been so overblown
that it's ridiculous so we're trying to
attack it tom and I
have been we've now filed three suits
together we're involved in three suits
and we are attacking it on the lack of a
public health emergency
if we and we fully expect to win this at
some level no matter where it's going to
be but we fully expect to win this
when that is one that there is no public
health emergency
all of the measures that have been
instituted fall by the wayside there's
absolutely no basis whatsoever then
to have any of these measures so
this is what we're claiming we did it in
the ohio suit
between the time that the ohio suit was
filed and the new mexico suit was filed
so much more information came out about
the unreliability of the pcr test
the fact that a portugal high appellate
court
found that the pcr tests were completely
useless at determining whether
traveling people coming into portugal
needed to be quarantined
based on the pcr test so they throw that
completely out in portugal
governor desantis in florida recently
said that all pcr tests
need to have the cycle threshold listed
because
that will decide if they're really
contagious or not because if you can
only find it
a positive result to a high cycle
threshold
then that means there is so little virus
that they could pop they could not even
possibly be contagious
a study in france
basically said that after 17 cycle
thresholds
the reliability of the test falls off
dramatically
and they don't recommend any above 30.
however all of the existing labs are
using
cycles and we found out in new mexico
they're using cycles of 40 and 45
how reliable can that be so obviously we
have to attack this
on everything we have and we say there's
no public emergency no public health
emergency because
the basis on which this was declared
they're all completely fraudulent in
faith
now we haven't claimed fraud in our case
in terms of the governor
committing fraud or somebody committing
fraud but we're saying the numbers
are fake the numbers are fraudulent so
that's that's the focus that we're doing
and you know uh dr ely talked about the
math and everything
that people couldn't do the math well
even the cdc admitted that 94
of all of the deaths that they had coded
being related to
covid had comorbidities and that
only six percent of them probably
actually had code
so how bad an emergency can it be when
we're talking about
survival bill survivability rates of 99
plus percent depending on your age group
and
the fact that most people have
they say they're either asymptomatic or
have very mild symptoms
well asymptomatic people are healthy
people they didn't have coping most
likely
because they never had symptoms so it's
not like we're all just
asymptomatic or positive or you know
it's we're healthy or
we're positive and the positivity needs
to be correlated with clinical symptoms
which they have not been
um that's you know they have not been
tested there's no gold standard for this
but where the the last suit we filed was
the cdc
suit that we filed which is to ask them
to stop
coding these deaths in fact I just
talked to someone this morning about
a gross violation of the whole coding
thing
gunshot wounds in a small county in
colorado
the coroner there asked the governor to
please take those off
a coven diagnosis or a coveted related
death
and the governor refused but these are
gunshot wounds
this is this is potentially a criminal
action of
murder or homicide or something else but
now it's being coded as clothing
what do you do in the legal system when
it they didn't really die or
gunshot wounds they died of coping
because they had a positive pcr test
it's absurd what do you do when somebody
is coded as covid
and they should be able their family
should be able to get an
accidental death uh insurance policy but
covet isn't an accidental death it's a
contagion it's usually excluded from
insurance claims there's so many
ramifications that can come from
coding the deaths incorrectly besides
the fear and hysteria
lockdowns mass social distancing we have
all sorts of problems that arise as a
result of that
the suffering that's happened in new
mexico has absolutely been
a level that I never thought I would see
come in
to the united states and that's what
prompted me
to get to come out of retirement
basically and
and start fighting these things and
we're seeking other attorneys who are
uh health and freedom liberty lovers as
we are because we know the next step
from this is mandatory vaccines and
that's another thing everyone
i'm going to call it the what dr ely
calls it the
uh experimental biologic uh
experimental biologic technology
something like that but at any rate we
know that that's the next battle that
we're going to have to fight here
because that is the natural consequence
of what we're doing and where
it's all going to see that so I really
appreciate the opportunity to be able to
tell people you know educate provide
something that I've learned about
and all of us have learned about and get
people to thinking about this that
what if this whole narrative is totally
false and totally incorrect
then what do we go back to living
normally I think so
you know that's my goal and I'm doing
everything in my power to
make that so in mexico because it will
have a far reaching effect
in other places so
wow on a that's an incredible summary of
all that you've learned and are doing on
behalf of us all thank you so much
so senator you've been involved in some
very interesting
cases concerning covid public health
policy
what do you think about what you've
heard and what do you think about
calling for a formal investigation
and what would you personally want to
see investigated
I think you're still muted senator
I think we'll get assistance with that
there we go hi senator
okay well first at the federal level
and for the cdc in particular the
information
quality act was meant to ensure that
policies were backed by valid scientific
and technical information
uh and there's a requirement
okay I'll start up again okay at the
federal level and for the cdc in
particular
the iqa the information quality act was
meant to ensure that policies were
backed by valid science and technical
information
along with the requirement that it be
rigorous
precise and useful for constructing
sound public policy
it also codified the public right to see
the source data the models and the
algorithms employed and the internal
and external standards for the review
process process
this is not optional this is an agency
obligation and it clearly has not been
been done uh say or you asked me what
would you like to see investigated and
quite frankly
everything needs to be reviewed not only
audit the data
but review the assessment processes the
determinant factors for policy
discussions
that weeded out relevant items in favor
of promoting
irrelevant data points this in
2020 hindsight all of this has happened
and we here are asking these questions
and the public deserves the answers the
hardest
uh area and maybe the most important
area would be
um to review the moral hazard that has
been
instigated and promoted by federal
healthcare funding models
and the counterproductive and and um
uh not only counterproductive but
moral hazard associated with covid19
incentives on death certificates for
example
what dr ely was describing here
in oregon actually across the u.s but
especially here in my state of oregon
states like new york and michigan
information is slowly surfacing that
shows the breadth of misinformation and
the severity of modeling errors
and these agencies quite frankly must be
held accountable the public has to
understand and recognize the soundness
of the quality
the objectives the utility the integrity
the scientific and technical even
statistical
information that the agencies are
adopting and disseminating
for public policy all of these appear
to be a one-sided
if you will top-down one-size-fits-all
approach and we the public
should know this by now and it's about
time we relearn this saying from lord
acton
power corrupts and absolute power
corrupts absolutely
and we are in the midst
of trying to figure out how do we
promote liberty
regardless of our race our gender our
political affiliate affiliation
how do we create a bridge to the future
that can unite
all of us in the common cause of
defending
our liberty to pursue our own medical
choices
without the nanny state stepping in and
forcing us to do one thing or the other
so we need to vigorously defend our
values by not being deceived by not
allowing us to be
fall prey to new definitions or
inaccurate assessments of the real facts
and more than anything we simply need to
stand and defend the truth
so all of it needs to be investigated
bring them tab to my office and I'll see
what we can do within our budget
wonderful thank you so much senator so
dr martin we have some questions for you
same questions actually what do you
think about what you've heard and is a
formal congressional
and or special grand jury investigation
warranted
what would you want to see investigated
well a couple things first of all
dr jack and I just so everybody knows
are actually not
at all on opposite pages or even
on at all conflicted with respect to the
rtpcr
the cdc patent on the rt pcr is largely
to blame for the fact that the
cdc chose to take a path that the rest
of the world didn't choose and that was
because they could force
others not into the market because of
their patent which gives rise to a very
fundamental
requirement for investigation under the
bi-doll act that was debated in 1979 and
passed in 1980
science in this country got hijacked by
industry
and this is regulatory capture this is
this is old school corruption this is
racketeering
this is antitrust violations this is
price fixing
remember that anthony fauci sits as the
purveyor of
an industry that was built on universal
in sequence hiv influenza
and now coronavirus vaccine promotion
his business 191 billion dollars of
public funds has been used and hijacked
191 billion dollars
under his leadership has passed through
his fingers
to achieve three failed objectives first
hiv vaccine
second pan influenza vaccine which he
said was going to be an
infant imprint vaccine and third
the coronavirus vaccine let's call it
what it is
this is racketeering this is antitrust
violations
and it's being perpetrated using
taxpayer dollars this
is in fact a criminal conspiracy and it
needs to be called what it is
and what dr jack is going to talk about
with rtbcr
I just want you to know I'm fully fully
endorsing what he's going to be
describing because
the issue is simple by filing patents on
the use of rtpcr
for coronavirus we do not have an
independent gold standard
anywhere not in the u.s or around the
world and the reason why we can debate
the application
of rtpcr is because cdc
under the bi-dole act was allowed to
preclude anyone from independent inquiry
into doing any form of diagnostics so
this is actually
something where going back to 2003
the ability to have independence has
been blocked
by the illegal and unethical use
of the bi-dole act from 1980 there has
to be an investigation into the
racketeering
there has to be an investigation into
the anti-trust violations
and this fundamentally brings criminal
not just civil complaints and that's the
important thing we need to show that
this is not an
oops I got it wrong this is a criminal
conspiracy it must be treated as such
and we must have leaders who have the
courage to get u.s attorneys and
district attorneys
and attorneys general in states to
actually bring
the appropriate legal action which is
not
civil it's criminal and we must
address this issue because this is a 191
billion dollar criminal crime syndicate
and in any other place we would actually
have
people cuffed and doing perk walks
and right now we're handing those people
awards
presidential medals of honor and it is
an absolute assault to everything that
we stand for in this country
so I'm I am all about congressional
investigations we have delivered the
fouchy dossier
by hand to every one of the senators in
the united states
taking a playbook from 1911 and 1912
we're calling for a peugeot commission
like investigation
which as you probably know historically
gave rise to the clayton act which is
the reform
of the antitrust acts in the united
states we are calling for exactly that
same thing now
which is a pujo commission for covid
that the congress takes on to bring
about
a investigation into an ultimate legal
reform
which ultimately will constrain the
abuses of the 9th and 10th amendment of
the constitution
and with that I could go on forever but
I appreciate having the opportunity I
look forward to hearing
the rest of this presentation but I
really want to see the ground to
people who are much smarter than me um
and and let's get the next panel on
thank you so much uh dr martin for that
so miss garner um
you have the floor for final thoughts
I do uh think that certainly filing
a criminal action is a very appropriate
thing because I think that this has been
a criminal enterprise
we felt that following the civil actions
and tom and I are both civil attorneys
we're not criminal attorneys and those
type of actions need to be brought by
attorney generals
or by district attorneys uh but in
filing the civil actions we feel that
we are taking the most direct path to
freeing up our liberties that have been
completely
taken away from us our liberties of
freedom to move around
freedom of association freedom to
worship freedom of expression
we have so many freedoms and liberties
that have absolutely been
shredded during this declared pandemic
and that is the time when our
constitutional rights
are the most precious and and
need to be upheld the most it's during
times of emergency
that was what our founding fathers
envisioned and that's what we're
going after these are constitutional law
cases that we're
presenting and that's why we're in
federal court but we are
we're doing everything we can to get
these types of
draconian measures reversed so that we
can
go back to living our lives normally and
save whatever businesses are still
able to hang on throughout these
considerable restrictions that have been
imposed on them so we're we're
really we want prayers uh we need
prayers
we feel that this is also a spiritual
battle in many ways
we ask for prayers and we ask for
support from people for what we're doing
here
so thank you thank you so much
panelists for this very powerful
round table so we'll be moving to our
final round table for the evening
we have dr jack dr ely superintendent
thielmann
dr bregen so we'll start with dr
jack this pcr test seems to be one of
the biggest problems with trusting the
data being reported by the cdc
what can you tell us about the problems
we've been hearing about the covid pcr
test
yeah at first I absolutely will I'm
going to give you guys some slide
presentation and detail that you'll
never forget
but first I want to address uh dr
martin's view
and my view on this you see if if
if society wakes up and says you know
based on dr henry hilly's paper
that there's a massive conspiracy theory
and
uh epidemiologists state epidemiologists
every public health official all across
the country
are all in bed with wuhan this is not
going to fly what we
have to do is we have to say dr david
martin's
dossier is a stunning indictment
on people who set this up and what I
meant
by disagreeing was on the very specific
motivation
specifically on why they won't budge
on the fact that we have a flawed pcr
test
they screwed up the tests they they
they stumbled all over themselves they
would have had the cat in the bag 100
if they didn't ship out that test they
wouldn't need
any uh commercial tests at all it was
anthony fauci in fact who said I guess
we're going to have to turn to the
commercial
test so if cdc flipped out a test they'd
have the license on it everybody have to
license to cdc and they'd be the richest
organization on the planet
so uh it's absolutely willful misconduct
at the highest
levels and I'm so I totally support dr
david martin
but I want to be because the way that
information propagates through social
networks and so on
it's very it's your head can be spinning
on how could there possibly be such a
massive conspiracy
the people in the middle they really
don't know what's going on they're being
they're good soldiers there's an
emergency you have to run the test this
way or it's going to get out of hand
and that and that's that's the
distinction it's a subtle distinction
but I'm going to cut right to uh
if I may cut right to the uh
the presentation that I have here
please uh thank you
okay so what I've done and this is ipac
research
uh independent research organization uh
when we talk about
deaths and diagnosis
and when when when the middle ground
epidemiologists say that there's no
false positives
there's such a wide different number of
uh
definitions of types of false positives
you can have the false positive of the
test
you can have a false positive of the
test in the lab with
with artificial sequences you can have
the false positive of the test
in the field on real patient data and
you can have a theoretical estimate of
the false positive just by doing blast
which is what fda asks for
what I'm going to do is I'm going to
show you every factor that has to be
considered to understand the accuracy
of the assessment uh the ascertainment
of death so this is about the diagnosis
in the situation where there's a death
involved uh it also is
directly applicable I was on top of this
way back in
april and you can go watch the
unbreaking science episode cdc's deadly
testing fiasco
and uh you'll find there that chris
meekins is a
whistleblower that came out and said
that uh cdc actually lied to the
president of the united states
uh over readiness of tests they were
stumbling all over themselves
but here we have the this is going to be
a big decision tree
we have somebody who's died they have a
coven 19 test before
or after their passing the test is
positive
or they were tested and it was positive
uh
this implies that the virus is present
but that actually in this
situation it means yes in this
particular patient
the virus was in fact present in this
particular patient the virus was in fact
viable and in this particular case
the virus caused the death uh we know
from
other published research this is not my
research but other published research
that
the ct value itself uh if you set the ct
threshold too high you're going to end
up with false positives
and non-transmissibility you're going to
end up with
deaths that are not attributed that are
attributed as causal but they're not
causal because even though it tested
positive
the person didn't die from it because
the virus wasn't even viable
and the world health organizations
recognized that the pcr
ct scores have to come down this is
their notice uh this is the sentinel
article showing that kansas actually did
the same thing
they they're bringing their ct scores
down and I expect state after state
is going to start dialing back their cts
so in this decision tree if this if the
virus was present
and the virus is viable it still could
be unrelated such as in the
situation of a person that has
government 19 who is killed by a shotgun
blast
so that death should not be attributed
we just heard about that that was a
brilliant uh
point but we also have in that case
would be a false positive
so in in in the very first category we
have the true positives
and then in the second category we have
a false positive because the virus was
not
was was viable but unrelated and then we
have the virus was
uh present but not viable that's another
category of false positives
and then we also have the fact that the
test might have a false positive rate
itself this is the clinical test false
positive the technical false positive
rate that we're talking about
everybody else talking about false
positives hasn't even addressed the
other two categories of false positives
so with the virus actually being absent
with the test
uh scoring positive that's those are the
rates that are published by basil
and lee and wernicke uh and and they're
a stunning indictment on the use of pcr
just to detect the virus let alone to do
the
clinical diagnosis and the the mortuary
uh
analysis so um here we have an example
where
yeah the person's tested but the test
was negative
and then um then we have of course the
possibility well
the virus isn't there but there's
consequences there uh
another category that joins that test
negative
are people that aren't tested at all
there are people that
die they're given a carbon-19 test uh no
they're they're not given a covenant 19
tests we're going to call those test
negatives as well
and then this is where the presumed
positives come in
this is where dr ely was referencing
earlier that the test is assumed
to uh regardless of the test result if
they're not tested
you can go ahead and assume any
respiratory illness is covered 19 with
the financial perverse incentive
that is going to turn out to be
something where it's complex because in
fact it could be
a true positive uh because they weren't
tested we don't know the virus could be
present
so we're going to put that back to this
category where the virus is present and
it can either become a true positive or
still two categories of false positives
here we have the presumed c uh
coronavirus
uh fatality but the virus is actually
absent and that's going to be a false
positive
uh and that also plays into um
enhancing these false positive rates
because these are again are just the
clinical uh the technical false
positives of the test
now if you have a negative test uh
either because you weren't tested or the
test turned back negative
if you don't presume if you overrule the
prescription
uh the mandate to presume all deaths due
to coven 19
if an otherwise specified if you have
another reason like dr scott jensen
estimates 25
of of his cases that he's looked at who
that died should not be
considered cavite 19 at all
then the virus could still be present
you could be wrong
and then it then come becomes the
question whether or not it was a causal
factor
uh or not and then the other category is
the virus is present but
but it was unrelated anyway and then of
course if it's not presumed and the
virus is true
truly absolutely have the true negatives
what I've done here is fleshed out the
entire tree
of possible combinations and you can see
there's the true positive
there's one route to two positives here
uh a circuitous route through
the presumption pathway there's uh I
count uh
four different categories of false
positives
uh of a false negative uh and then
uh two categories of of true negative
what this represents is an
irreconcilable number of ways to get
this wrong with cdc's algorithm
cdc's algorithm should absolutely have
invited public comment
so people like me and the hundreds or
thousands of other people in the country
that are involved in clinical
diagnostics have developed clinical
diagnostics and biomarkers
could point this very scenario out to
the cdc
way back in march and ask them what are
you thinking
this is madness look at what's going to
happen to you
you have to make sure that you have zero
false positives
and you can't just claim that you have
zero false positives
because the prevalence is low 

This is the reference I wanted to say about we
need to basically replace the CDC: Plan B Public Health Infrastructure and
Operations Oversight Reform for America.
The CDC is not in any way—we heard it tonight—interested 
in any other cause of morbidity or mortality in the United
States other than pathogenic illness that they might be able to
prevent the diagnosis of with a vaccine.  This is a massive, 
massive mistake on the part of the United States of
America.

I'm asking every American citizen contact their congressman and 
their senator and say, Take a look at this. Send them this paper.
It's freely available online. It's peer-reviewed.
Send it to your representatives and say, We really need
to find out what the major causes of morbidity and mortality are 
in the United States and how do we reform the way we conduct 
ourselves in the United States of America that take <i><u><b>all
of those concerns</b></u></i> into play?

I'm not going to go into details but basically what we end up with 
is a neural network arrangement of entities scattered across the 
country that can't do anything but learn. The most important 
point here is that at the end this is de-politicized. It is 
distributed all across the country in a way that that is decentralized
and the President of the United States, and the Vice President of the
United States who is President Pro Tempore of the House
is informed on what the policies are. So it can never become
public health&mdash;your public health, your wellness,
your medical wellness&mdash;can never again become a political 
commodity. It is already a financial commodity.

but look into plan b that's absolute
essential reform in the united states
and our goal to help out here
dr ely's on it now we were not
collaborating before
the publication we are now on a
committee
uh that is overseeing this particular uh
nucleic acid
technology technology evaluation
consortium we're going to outfit dr
singh hang lee
with a workflow access to clinical
resources
throughout new england access uh to the
resources he needs
to actually sequence more of the
clinical samples there's not enough
sequencing done in the united states and
everyone knows it
uh to do sequencing by his method which
he assures us will
actually tell us what's present in the
sample and not just tell us
it's covered 19 or not it will also tell
us
based on my prompting to include primers
for other pathogens so we can see if
it's
influenza a b oh and others as well
dolores cahill
also it prompted this um
there are many people on the consortium
it's at the ipac website
uh we our initial goal is 133 000 to
just fund dr lee the overall consortium
is the goal is 300 000 so we can outfit
him
uh with a next generation sequencer so
we can do the whole genome sequencing of
pathogens as well
uh and so you can find the nucleic acid
testing evaluation consortium at the
ipac website
this is the the pictures of the people
who've joined up joined on the
consortium
we're a pretty close-knit group I'm all
business about science
uh and uh you know hope to help to hope
to make these things
a reality and we need your help well dr
jack thank you and I commend you for
diving so deeply into
the most granular of levels with the
data disaster we're
revealing today as well as providing a
solution now
so that's what's so encouraging about
your work
and of course this event is we're going
to empower you
listeners with a way to contact your
elected officials
and disseminate this information very
easily
so stay with us the call to action is
coming soon
so dr ely you've done a lot of working
helping
people understand this asymptomatic
transmission right
and in your upcoming paper I think it's
going to be also highlighted
uh what we'd love to hear from you is a
little bit more about that
concept as well as safe and effective
treatments that
are available but they're getting almost
no uh
mainstream coverage well uh sayer thank
you
so much uh for that and I what I
what I want to say first and foremost is
uh I'm very passionate
and um I'm also very optimistic and I
believe that there are good people
in these institutions I i believe that
there are good people at the county
level at the state level
i've been very fortunate to talk with uh
the head
epidemiologist on an expert forum just
last week
about nutrition and he agreed with me
that nutrition
that people who get the nutrition we're
about to talk about
have much better outcomes and that we
have to do a better job of getting that
information
to the people and and so I'm openly
pressing to collaborate with him and our
intention
is always to collaborate with the good
people who don't have an agenda don't
have
a financial motive or a or a conflict of
interest and so forth
uh so to that end I really commend what
dr martin
is saying because it's so passionate
what dr jack is saying because it's so
com it's so just passionate and I think
what
what dr jack just said that as a doctor
it makes me go this is exactly why we do
say our confirmatory lab testing
we don't rely just on one test as as the
key and only diagnostic we rely on viral
load testing we rely on antibody testing
we take
a sample and we put it in a live cell
culture and see if it can
infect the cell and and therefore prove
infect
infectivity in the person but in
medicine we don't rely on one test
ever we always have confirmatory tests
and that's what helps us get to what's
so important
say or what's called the definitive
diagnosis now as it pertains to
nutrient deficiencies the cdc has known
via their inhane studies for over 20
years
that 35 to 45 percent of americans are
deficient in vitamin a
uh 37 to 46 percent of americans are
deficient in vitamin c
uh 65 to 95 percent of americans are
deficient in vitamin d
uh 60 to 84 percent of americans are
deficient in vitamin e
and 11 to 15 percent of americans are
deficient in zinc
it's not a coincidence that each of
these nutrients I just mentioned
are key biochemical players in
a well-nourished and effective immune
system
you need to have these nutrients in
order for your immune system
to do its job so that if even one of
these is missing
then you run the risk of an immune
system that is not able to correctly
deal with
infections including sars cove too we've
cold the research there my team is just
crushed it on this level
finding hundreds of evidence-based
clinical trials specifically for covid
i'm going to read just a couple of them
to your to your viewers
vitamin a vitamin c vitamin d and iodine
were administered to 107
moderate to severe covid patients all of
them fully recovered within
seven days of treatment and this was
actually published on dr
jack's independent peer-reviewed journal
ipac
a chinese hospital in the epicenter in
wuhan took on
50 cases of moderate to severe covet 19
and used iv vitamin c and
what they found was that not only did uh
was there no morbidity
that but that the stay in the hospital
was on
average three to five days shorter than
the people who didn't use
intravenous uh vitamin c therapy there
was
no mortality in the ivaa group
there were no side effects from the ivaa
group and there was
a successful 100 management of cytokine
storms
huge vitamin d3 in another study
significantly
reduced icu admission rates as well as
reduced the severity of covet 19 disease
of the 50 total patients who received
vitamin d3 only one
was admitted to the icu that makes up
two percent of their study
of the 26 patients who were not
administered vitamin d3
13 were admitted to the icu of the 50
patients
treated with vitamin d3 zero deaths
occurred and all 50 patients were
eventually discard discharged
without complications just a couple more
vitamin d deficiency was associated
with increased hospitalizations and
increased
mortality severe cases of covet 19
were 64 more likely to be vitamin d
deficient than mild cases of covid19
their conclusion sayer
vitamin d deficiency is associated with
higher infection rates
increased instances of sepsis and
increased mortality risk among
critically ill populations last one for
you sayer on the on the studies
a total of 191 779
patients were included in this study uh
median age was 54 years
60 percent of this of the enrolled
participants were female
the sars cove two positivity rate was
higher in
the 39 190 patients with deficient
levels of vitamin d that's under 20
nanograms per milliliter
then the 27 870 patients with adequate
and adequate was just
considered 34 to 30 to 34 nanograms
there
from a naturopathic doctor standpoint
that's still deficient
okay but when we get to over 50
nanograms per
liter of vitamin d when they do a blood
sample
only 5.9 of the people
who had that high level of vitamin d
circulate in their bloodstream
even contracted it now here's their
conclusions there sars cove to
positivity is
strongly and inversely associated with
circulating vitamin d
in the bloodstream a relationship that
persists across all latitudes
all races all ethnicities both sections
and age ranges what did I say earlier
this is
the sars cove two doesn't care what the
color of your skin
is it cares about your nutrient status
all right our fight there's their final
statement on this our findings provide
impetus to explore the role of vitamin d
supplementation
in reducing the risk of sars cove to
infection and covid
19 disease now what I want to say to
that sayer is my
team has authored now a definitive
guideline based upon evidence based
research surreal science into
determining
what amount our seniors adults
teens our school age kids and even all
the way down to one year of age
need to have on a daily basis to protect
themselves so that we could have a safe
return to in-person education
a responsible reopening of small of
small businesses and
a a getting back on with our lives
because
I don't know about you sir but for me
americans don't let americans die alone
but that's been happening americans
don't let american children
suffer alone but that's been happening
americans
at our core we are good we are
good people and what's going on right
now
is not good so to that end say I'll
answer your final question about the
asymptomatic transmission and build off
of what
ms garner had said earlier about the
wuhan study
there was one study done about
asymptomatic transmission this is going
to blow your mind if you're watching
this at home it's going to blow it blew
my mind it was published in november in
nature journal

The wuhan participant study had 9 million
898 828 enrolled participants almost 10
million participants that they tested
using
the PCR. Only 300 possible asymptomatic
carrier candidates were
identified so then they took those 300
they said let's
put there let's get confirmatory lab
tested they're doing what
should happen of the 300 possible
asymptomatic carriers
all were tested using live cell culture
to determine if their pcr samples
could produce replication competent
virus a phrase you've heard dr fauci say
repeatedly
all 300 of those people that they
thought were asymptomatic carriers
could not one of them could produce a
lifestyle culture meaning that
none of them were infectious so what
that told us
was that out of the 9 million 898
828 people tested in the largest study
ever conducted in a single year with
enrolled participants
there was a 0.000
chance of asymptomatic transmission it
has to this day
never been proven our fifth paper proves
that
and all of these studies that you see
coming out funded by the nih funded by
the cdc
that are published in jama they are
nothing more than projection model
studies with
zero enrolled participants they are in
essence
scientific fraud and it's something that
is absolutely disgusting and that we
have to denounce as a culture
so that we can get to the heart of the
matter and get on with ending the
suffering
that our brothers and sisters are going
through right now I
can not abide by the amount of suffering
that the people that we love so much are
enduring it's
been too long it's enough let's get on
with it
that is so beautiful and so resonant and
I yeah I just I really appreciate that
you communicated that to everyone
listening
it's super helpful uh so super
uh intended theo theomen given what
you've just heard what's going on
through your mind right now
and what are the implications of what
you heard for in-person education
and athletics for our children
well yeah um there's just been a
tremendous amount of information
and a lot of it mirrors what we've
experienced here
being open as a school uh the narrative
that that
we've been told didn't and the data that
was being posted
didn't relate to the experience we were
having in real life and uh
you know I'm a school superintendent so
I kind of give the qualitative side not
not so much the quantitative side of
this but I really want to emphasize
and I think it was dr bregan also said
this and uh you know dr ely talking
about just simple vitamins
and nutrients um I mean these are
no-brainer things that
that we ought to be doing and I just
really want to
highlight the why so you know dr reagan
talked about
children need connection and love
children need to be in school
and I live about 65 miles away from the
place I work and I was talking to a
mother
after church she was in tears because
her son wanted to drop out of high
school and I said well hey
i'll let me talk to your kid and I'll
see if
he he would be interested in coming out
to lc because I'm driving there anyway
and I'll just pick him up in the morning
on each school day so sure enough I went
and
marketed the the and the young man said
yeah
you know what okay I'm gonna come to
this little tiny school
and within six weeks you know he's a new
kid and totally bought in
every day he's waiting at six o'clock in
the morning
never been late always on the forge
absolutely engaged in school because
he had been out of school so long how
long and short of it is sometimes we
have late nights because I have late
night board meetings
once a month and uh my daughter also
comes to school here and so where
it's usually a crowded car uh we got out
about 10 30 and my daughter fell asleep
and this young man fell asleep and then
we all of a sudden he woke up and
he was talkative and he he started
telling me
and it's hard to talk about because this
is the real human side
he started talking to me about how he
was finally on
ending ending his you know doing harm to
himself
attempting on his life and then this guy
showed up and said hey come to school
and then he just thought well why not
and
he said I and and he talked about how
his entire life has changed because he's
been able to come to school in person
and that he's got a superintendent that
picks him up
and of course I'm listening to this and
what do you say other than listen
and he said uh and I cannot wait I've
never played
a sport in my life and everyone wants me
to play football
well this young man is a very very big
big kid
and in a small school he stands out
and he's popular and he has friends and
um I'll tell you I didn't sleep that
night because
um we have a governor who up until very
very recently and only under tremendous
amounts of pressure
largely produced by people like myself
said no to sports and uh
you know I just finally you know threw
down with
with our with our decision makers they
can have football or funerals
to date in oregon the state of oregon
kids zero to 19 years old
we have lost zero kids age zero to 19
to covet but all of the schools are
closed
at least the vast majority kids have
been isolated
and they're doing harm to themselves and
it's not just the ones that end their
lives it's the ones that cut
it's the ones that are are succumbed to
anxiety and depression
who withdraw who get engaged in things
that are okay because they're on the
computer all day
these are the qualitative aspects of
some of the other things that some of
the other speakers have done a better
job of quantizing you know quantizing
and that's what I want to leave the
audience with
why should we push forward and
investigate this
that's why we're talking about the next
generation of kids that we have
we are failing and we will continue to
fail if we don't bring this out into the
light
and we don't make a course correction
very very
quickly thank you so much for that
so dr bregen uh you're our final
panelist
for this uh round table you know at the
risk of
asking an obvious question why is it so
important for a children to be back in
school
immediately and without undue
restriction and what can we expect
throughout society if this questionable
emergency continues on for much longer
um well I'd like to make a few summary
remarks since I'm the last person as
well
briefly and I want to start out by
thanking stand for health freedom
I mean this is amazing what you've done
and um it's just marvelous
and um
uh we we haven't seen uh leah wilson
here
on the film anywhere so I want to just
give her a shout out and say
thanks for having me here along with all
these other distinguished guests
um I would like to
um well about our children we
we're probably setting them way back
it's a good potential catastrophe we're
teaching them to be afraid of each other
we're teaching them to be afraid of
their government we're teaching them
that
nobody cares enough about them to risk
getting covert 19
to teach them um we're giving them
bringing them up in a paranoid world
we're going to make them more scared um
none of this is taken into account by
the public health people zero
you just don't find any discussions I
haven't in public health literature
certainly in the medical literature I
haven't found any I'm a physician I
haven't found any
so we need to open the schools up
we don't have a medical crisis we have
a politically induced with the excuse of
covet 19
social crisis and political crisis
one of the things that has not been
mentioned enough I think
is that america is in a state of
political crisis
we have been cowed our children had been
towned
I was reading a article by a
letter by a fellow physician
and she was describing sitting in her
office and seeing a line of
five years old four years old three
years old that would have ordinarily
been holding hands
and they had their hands behind their
backs
and their heads were bent and then masks
on their faces
and they weren't relating to anybody
and then it brought to her mind and mine
images
of the gulag this is what we're
preparing our children for we are
preparing them
not to be citizens of a robust
democratic republic
but to be citizens of global predators
uh
bizarre kind of global governance that's
going on right now outside the hands
even of
the governments so
that would that's enough to say about
the kids
I want to say that um
we need all the approaches we can have
to looking at this
um I'm
i'm not concerned about somebody saying
i'm
giving a conspiracy theory I'm not
interested anymore in people and
they're saying that we need to take
overview look at what next going on
and then we need to take the scientific
look
I mean I started out being given this
giant
task that I guess what most people are
seeing is my little affidavit but you
know
like this paper for the legal case and
it started out with
oh yeah that the effects on the children
and then I looked at
fauci we've talked about voucher I've
been studying pouching
but fauci leads to china
directly to china and we
need to be able to listen to that
because america is in
a war with another country we haven't
declared it they declared it decades ago
they have a policy of undermining
america
getting their scientists into all of our
laboratories into all of our schools
and they are the ones that released
whether accidentally or not
coveted 19 they then spread it around
the world with all their might
with the cooperation of all the major
medical journals nobody called their
feet to the fire
the world health organization nobody's
saying why did you shut down
travel in china and send your airplanes
out
for weeks spreading the virus so we're
looking at
something large it's not really as vague
as I may be sounding
it's economic it's political
and 

I think we just need to be seriously looking at every level now because 
I think America is in as much danger as prior to the civil war, prior 
to the revolutionary war right now. We really need to take it seriously.
I'll give you a couple of examples of the stuff that I've been working on,
writing about.

A study is created in Brazil where people are given hydroxychloroquine
in multiples of the toxic dose for older people and for sick people.
It's put up online and in one day it's covered in the <i>New York Times</i>
as &lsquo;don't take hydroxy, it kills people&rsquo. On one more day 
it's put up online by the <i>Journal the American Medical Association</i>
and on and on from there.
<i>Lancet</i> has done the same thing. New England Journal of Medicine</i> 
has done the same thing.  WHO is doing the same thing.  All of our major 
agencies.  The CDC, it's acting like it's got medical jurisdiction
telling us how we're supposed to be treated. The FDA is way overstepped its
legal bounds. The NIH tells us that we can't treat people with covid-19.
I can&mdash;I'm a doctor. I could treat a person if I wanted to, though
I'm a psychiatrist. When one of my family members got sick I had to put 
them in charge with the Front Line Doctors&mdash;again it's important 
to know about the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons&mdash;and 
in one day she and her partner were well in the middle of a severe
beginning of this case of covid-19 and she had many, many vulnerabilities.
She wasn't that young.

A lot of it involves things that Doctor Ealy is talking about.
The physicians, because&mdash;we have to give drugs. You know that.
And I'm very sympathetic to your viewpoint because everything you're
talking about, pretty much what they're combining with the
medications they're using. So who knows what it is? We got to
study all this. We need everybody working on these issues from every
branch of medicine.

I want to just leave you&mdash;we're really looking at something that is
so much bigger than covid-19. We are looking at the death of freedom
in science, the death of freedom in our chat rooms, and in our
twitter and in our youtube, all these companies. And all these
companies want to continue covid-19. They'll take anybody down they 
feel like it who's got a good idea about it. Literally.

So this thing's being kept up. It's being upheld by a huge number 
of collaborating&mdash;roughly collaborating agents around the world 
including almost every billionaire that I could check out and all of
the big companies.

so I want to
leave you with the overview
and thank you so much for uh giving us
all a voice here
um and uh
one last message I'm 84 years old
i'm going on 85.
um by the way my mind seems to be
gotten a little better um
I think because uh I just keep
having a happier and happier marriage
for 35 years
my mind keeps getting better and better
under my wife's influence
and with stand for health freedom
we created uh a uh
elders who don't want the school's
clothes elders who don't want the
restaurants
closed so my message is my final message
now as an
elder and I signed this petition first
and then my wife ginger
signed that she's 17 I'm 84 going on
five she's 79
and then her mom who lives with us
signed it she's 94.
and then we have we have thousands of
people and this is all all because of
um
health stand for health freedom
and I want to say even if it killed me I
wouldn't want this being done to our
children
and that's what we say and it isn't
going to kill me not very
prob probably going to be something else
something else
actually we we think we had it we had
the loss of taste and smell and
the cough and everything way back in
january I have chinese
friends and chinese community at cornell
and not at cornell
they'll have a heart attack and fight
apply that
so we elders want you all to go
free and then we'll take care of
ourselves because we're the only
vulnerable people and we may be hardly
vulnerable at all because as you heard
today
the whole medical establishment is a
pack of liars right now
live live that's my concluding rate mark
live that's a great way to conclude dr
bregen thank you
before we close the panel off and also
close with
final remarks as well as the call to
action
dr ely would like to make one last
comment here
so feel free
dr ely will be on here in a minute
I want to acknowledge that okay are you
here
yeah I'm here I was talking and I was
sorry
yeah it was much that's as bad as my
having my snack of mixed nuts in the
middle
dr bregen we're cut from the same cloth
it was just user error buddy
so um what I what I want to say first
and foremost there was
thank you so much for doing this and I
wanted to say
on behalf of all the panelists and to
all the panelists
thank you for coming up it shouldn't be
an
act of bravery to speak truth but
for whatever reason it is and say
you your team have been amazing I just
want to say one final thought out to
anybody watching this
um and I mean this and it this might
come along as
come out as a little kitschy or whatever
I don't care
all right like what dr bregen just said
we're at a moment where we
where we need some catchy stuff but
I encourage all of my black brothers and
sisters all of my anglo warrior mamas
and papas
mi hermanos hermanas mikapuna kanes
as well as my asian uncles arabic
aunties and hebrew cousins
to join us in taking action it's we we
can't
sit on the sidelines on this one please
do what sayer asks you to do after this
join us in calling for formal
investigations into the cdc's conduct
we've all been through so much
and we deserve to know the truth that's
what dr martin is advocating for that's
what dr
jack is advocating for that's what me
and my team are advocating for
and I just want to say it's our time to
call in our ancestors and say
in the words of the great first nations
peoples
a whole itaque oyasin which means for
all of our relations
that's our call to action and our call
to service
it's not about skin tone it's not about
your culture it's not about who you
voted for
it's not about your religion and where
you worship it's about
our children and our humanity that's
what it's about
that's why we're doing this beautiful
thank you so much and thank you so much
panelists
I just want to acknowledge that every
single person that came here tonight
to share their experience knowledge and
what they've already been doing
on our behalf is contributing profoundly
to humanity
and I have so much respect and
admiration for each and every one of you
and I think by showing up in this way we
are inspiring so many of you now who are
also taking
the time and interest to really learn
about
the facts of how we ended up in this
situation
we have presently experienced around the
world
the suspension of fundamental civil
liberties
basic human rights economic destruction
that has wrought
far more damage than any specific virus
could be capable of
and so what we're asking people to do is
to join us
and be part of really taking back
control of our
destinies on a very basic level and what
we have
thankfully is the stanford health
freedom
advocacy platform all you have to do
is go down below if you're watching from
stanford freedom if you're on youtube
there'll be a link to this page and you
can go to the take
action tab then scroll down to our new
cdc campaign
this is a very effective way to send a
direct
message stanfeld freedom exists so that
there are no barriers to
entry that anyone can contact their
elected officials and
go ahead and make a a clear statement
that you stand for
everything that we've discussed here
today as far as transparency as far as
affirming
informed consent parental rights and
again
very basic human rights are at stake in
this situation
after you click on it on the tab take
action
it takes a click of a button to send a
pre-drafted customizable
email to key congressmen and women
asking for
formal hearing and investigation into
the cdc's conduct
during covet 19 specifically on the
lawfulness
of changing death certificates once you
act
on campaign please share this video and
the call to action link with at least
three people
this network effect will literally grow
this into
a movement that will affect change at a
very high
and signific significant level it's all
of us
coming together taking action together
and standing together
that makes a difference so once again
thank you so much panelists
thank you everyone that's here let's
spread this far and wide
together we are going to make a
beautiful difference in the world
thanks so much