Data Disaster: A Call for an Investigation Into the CDC’s Conduct During COVID-19
Stand for Health Freedom
https://youtu.be/on_p-sKxjGc
17 Feb 2021

Take a stand: https://standforhealthfreedom.com/action/investigate-the-cdc/

Download the peer reviewed research paper highlighting the CDC's controversial conduct and learn more about the speakers here: https://standforhealthfreedom.com/CDC-investigation

Tune in to learn: 
Why we should be concerned about death certificate data.
Why accuracy, integrity and transparency are so important during a public health crisis.
How the CDC set the stage for widespread devastation -- physical, psychological and economic.
What we can do so that incidents of this magnitude never happen again.

Panelists

Sayer Ji (Moderator) -- Author; Founder of GreenMedInfo; Co-founder, Stand for Health Freedom
Dr. Peter Breggin -- World-renowned psychiatrist and medical ethicist
Mary Starrett -- Chair, Board of Commissioners, Yamhill County, Oregon
Dr. David Martin -- Founder and Chairman of M-CAM Inc.; Batten Fellow at the University of Virginia's Darden Graduate School of Business Administration
Mark Thielman -- Superintendent, Alsea School District (Oregon) 
Ana Garner, Esq. -- Attorney; Creator, Higher Path Solutions
Dennis Linthicum -- Oregon State Senator
Dr. James Lyons-Weiler -- Biomedical researcher; Scientific journal author; IPAK
Dr. Henry Ealy -- Naturopath; Scientific journal author; Energetic Healing Institute

00:01
thank you everyone for joining us for
00:03
tonight's
00:03
uh broadcast we are doing a presentation
00:07
and a panel titled beta disaster a call
00:11
for an investigation into the cdc's
00:14
conduct during covet 19.
00:17
you know data accuracy integrity
00:19
transparency are essential aspects of
00:21
crisis management
00:23
and public health policy especially in
00:25
societies that value freedom
00:27
from accurate data we work together to
00:30
make decisions that are effective and
00:33
work for everyone
00:34
in this event we'll show you all the
00:36
ways that the cdc manipulated covid data
00:39
and
00:39
inflated cases and fatalities ignored
00:42
recoveries
00:43
and promoted public health policies
00:45
based on faulty data
00:47
transparency includes reviewing what
00:49
worked and also looking at what did not
00:52
work
00:53
and this is exactly what we are drawing
00:55
attention to
00:56
to today it's okay to be wrong but too
00:58
many times throughout this crisis we've
01:00
seen public officials attempt to
01:02
sidestep
01:03
accountability and double down on
01:05
ineffective policies that are based more
01:08
on assumptions than actual
01:09
science and verifiable data and why are
01:13
public health officials clinging to the
01:15
one size
01:16
fits all approach of mass and social
01:18
distancing policies
01:20
when there is highly compelling evidence
01:22
supporting the use
01:23
of safe and effective treatments such as
01:26
vitamin d
01:27
and vitamin c 11 months ago we were
01:30
asked to make a three-week sacrifice for
01:33
the greater good
01:34
almost a year later there's no end in
01:37
sight
01:38
if you felt in that you don't
01:41
know who or what or to trust anymore
01:43
you're not alone
01:44
to help bring in new ideas we've brought
01:46
together incredible panelists
01:49
who've invested thousands of hours of
01:51
investigative research into the topic of
01:53
covet 19.
01:55
we brought together peer-reviewed
01:56
authors in science attorneys taking
01:59
legal action
02:00
and elected officials civil servants and
02:02
educators
02:03
who are asking good questions on your
02:06
behalf
02:06
we brought them together to create a
02:08
conversation specifically
02:10
for you throughout this conversation we
02:13
will present
02:14
evidence that we feel justifies a
02:16
thorough investigation
02:18
of the cdc's conduct during the covet 19
02:21
crisis
02:22
our panel will discuss not only how we
02:24
got here
02:25
but more importantly what you can do
02:28
about it
02:28
there is going to be a very powerful
02:30
call to action so please bear with us
02:32
through the first two hours of this
02:34
event if you're one of millions of
02:37
people
02:38
who've lost so much and feel your pain
02:41
we we feel your pain
02:42
and stand with you i'm serious
02:44
co-founder of stand for health freedom
02:46
and we have so much to share with you
02:48
tonight
02:49
at the conclusion of our time today we
02:51
will give you
02:52
simple steps to take action to
02:54
participate and to use your voice to
02:56
help restore
02:57
transparency and accountability in the
02:59
data that drives public policy
03:01
and ultimately affects every single one
03:04
of your daily lives
03:06
so let me introduce you our panelists
03:10
now for many decades dr peter bregen has
03:12
promoted evidence-based compassionate
03:14
therapies
03:15
and been a champion for restoring
03:17
ethical and conscience-based practices
03:20
in the field of psychiatry he's an
03:22
expert
03:23
on the mental and emotional impacts of
03:25
covid public health policies
03:27
especially on our children welcome dr
03:30
bregen
03:31
is there one piece of mental health
03:33
advice that you could share with our
03:35
viewers right from the start
03:37
yes i think the fundamental human
03:39
problem in
03:40
any very stressful situation is not to
03:44
get
03:44
helpless so you learn to identify in
03:47
yourselves your children
03:49
your friends your spouse your co-workers
03:51
whoever you're working with
03:52
those signs of helplessness usually
03:55
looks like anxiety
03:56
but it could be anger it could be shame
03:59
guilt
04:00
anything negative that that person acts
04:02
like they can't handle
04:04
and we have to see that in ourselves
04:06
because a lot of the technique
04:09
of public health is to make people feel
04:12
helpless and docile so that they will
04:14
follow instructions
04:16
and do what they're told and not run
04:19
away
04:20
but not shut down but be there and
04:23
and and do what you're told and we need
04:25
to look out for these techniques
04:27
and look at the confusion that's being
04:29
engendered in this look at the
04:30
contradictory
04:31
statements and keep coming back to
04:35
but i don't have to get helpless about
04:38
this
04:38
and that will that will save your life
04:40
under many conditions
04:43
thank you so much for that dr bergen our
04:46
next panelist is
04:47
an inspired elected official who sought
04:49
accurate data
04:50
questioned the one-size-fits-all
04:52
guidance and courageously fought to
04:54
protect the citizens in her country
04:56
in her county sorry welcome yam hill
04:59
county commissioner mary starrett
05:02
what's one piece of advice you can give
05:04
to our viewers who want to get active on
05:06
the local
05:06
legislative level thank you sarah i'll
05:09
first quickly start with a story 30
05:11
years ago when i was in television i
05:13
interviewed a harvard trained
05:15
psychiatrist who was on my program
05:17
he wrote a book called toxic psychiatry
05:20
and he was dr peter bregen
05:22
and that book set me off on a journey
05:24
that was changed the whole trajectory of
05:26
my ideology
05:27
and it also led uh to me advocating for
05:31
children in foster care who are over
05:32
medicated on psychiatric medications
05:35
and it's led to advocacy on a bill
05:37
that's now before the oregon legislature
05:39
which would report require
05:41
accountability for over medicating kids
05:43
in foster care
05:44
i say that is because education is a
05:46
huge piece
05:48
if we can have in our sphere of
05:49
influence and
05:51
an impact on somebody who is in a policy
05:53
making position
05:54
i used to sit on that same program every
05:56
year roll up my sleeve and get a flu
05:58
shot
05:59
to influence other people to do it until
06:01
i was informed
06:02
this might not be the best course of
06:04
action so inform people have
06:06
relationships with your elected
06:08
officials
06:08
encourage them to look outside what
06:11
their normal
06:12
public health uh narrative is and
06:15
remember that all politics is local
06:17
and when elected officials feel the heat
06:19
they see the light
06:20
in a kind compassionate way educate them
06:23
make relationships and remember that
06:25
politics at the local level
06:27
is more nimble more flexible and more
06:29
responsible to constituents
06:32
that's so beautifully communicated thank
06:33
you mary
06:35
dr david martin is an author professor
06:38
tireless servant of humanity who has
06:39
been passionately investigating the
06:41
events that led up to the covet public
06:43
health response since 1999.
06:46
what he has to share is shocking to say
06:48
at least and will definitely inspire
06:50
action welcome dr martin wonderful to be
06:54
here sayer thank you so much
06:56
thank you what's one piece of advice or
06:58
takeaway you can share with our viewers
07:00
as we embark on reviewing the cdc's
07:02
conduct during covet
07:04
well it's important for us to realize
07:06
that going back to 1999 and from 1999 to
07:09
2002
07:11
a very insidious program hijacked what
07:14
was public health and turn this into a
07:16
commercial game
07:17
because it was in 1999 that the united
07:20
states
07:20
started funding what became the
07:23
recombinant research
07:25
in 2001 and 2002
07:28
specifically targeting the formation of
07:30
a coronavirus that was
07:32
increased in its pathogenicity but
07:35
decreased in its capacity to be
07:36
replicated
07:38
and by 2003 the cdc owned the patents on
07:41
sars coronavirus isolated from humans it
07:45
owned
07:45
the ability to detect that virus and
07:48
it owned the ability to actually do any
07:51
interventions around it so this has been
07:53
a commercial enterprise
07:55
since 2003 and it's important to realize
07:58
that cdc didn't not only fulfill their
08:01
public health obligation
08:03
but actually took from the public access
08:06
to independently verify any of this
08:08
information which gave rise to the game
08:10
plans
08:11
for the covid19 program which we'll
08:13
cover in much greater detail
08:15
wow thank you for that um very very
08:18
important context for this
08:19
discussion next we have superintendent
08:23
mark thielmann who's one of a few
08:24
superintendents who
08:26
fought for his students teachers
08:27
administrators to make sure
08:29
in person education happened and
08:31
happened safely
08:33
now he's fighting to make sure his
08:34
students get to play sports and his
08:36
teachers don't have to choose between
08:38
a jab or a job welcome superintendent
08:41
thielmann
08:44
what's one piece of advice you'd like to
08:46
share with any parents watching
08:50
well thank you for having me and i
08:52
appreciate it i apologize i had to
08:54
double in on my cell phone because our
08:55
internet temporarily went down and
08:57
this is one of the the downsides of
08:59
rural education in oregon
09:01
um a couple things i want to share with
09:03
folks is that um
09:05
you know in terms of public education
09:07
it's so important
09:08
that we get good information especially
09:11
when we're dealing with
09:12
people's children and their taxes and
09:15
this whole
09:16
process that we've gone through with the
09:18
pandemic and among other issues has been
09:20
extremely frustrating
09:22
so uh we we were in a position of of
09:25
saying you know where we exist to serve
09:27
families and students
09:28
and so we pushed back and we've been
09:31
successful at
09:32
being allowed to stay open and the
09:35
difference it's made for
09:36
for students and families it's it's
09:38
incalculable
09:39
and i just really want to encourage
09:41
everyone to uh
09:42
stand up and and to really do their own
09:45
research
09:46
uh because that's what we did and we
09:48
showed that schools can operate
09:51
safely with cove and mitigation of
09:53
course
09:54
and we've had zero cases of covenant
09:56
we've been open since august so
09:57
i just really want to try to encourage
10:00
and empower everyone to focus on what
10:01
we're able to do and what we can do
10:03
rather than all the things that could go
10:05
wrong
10:07
thank you that's a very strong example
10:09
of what's possible for so many others
10:11
out there
10:11
so thank you for that so anna garner is
10:15
a fierce attorney with over three
10:17
decades of courtroom experience she's
10:19
introduced a number of potentially
10:21
historic cases regarding covet 19
10:23
including a case against the cdc she
10:26
wants you to know that despite the lack
10:28
of media coverage there are over 900
10:30
current cases filed with respect to this
10:33
crisis
10:34
welcome miss garner thank you thank you
10:37
for having me
10:38
thank you for being here what's a fun
10:41
tidbit of information you can share
10:44
about
10:45
covet cases well i certainly echo the
10:49
sentiment
10:49
of the other panelists who've spoken and
10:51
that is that the
10:53
collection of data is a very important
10:56
function
10:57
that the cdc engages in and when they
10:59
changed their
11:01
method of reporting deaths but only
11:03
deaths related to covet 19
11:06
they skewed their reporting in a way
11:09
that
11:10
lacks the integrity that the laws say
11:12
that they must adhere to
11:14
so we ended up filing a lawsuit against
11:16
the human health
11:18
services department and the cdc um
11:21
in which we're asking the court for
11:23
injunctive relief
11:25
asking them to stop the cdc from using
11:28
these falsified numbers as a result of
11:31
the way that they now
11:33
code these debts and the lawsuit by the
11:36
way was inspired
11:37
by the article that
11:41
dr ely and etal wrote and we're very
11:44
grateful for him we knew that they had
11:45
changed the rules but we didn't realize
11:48
uh some of the ramifications of it until
11:50
we read his report so he was
11:52
definitely an inspiration in that and
11:54
we're very we'll talk more about the
11:55
other lawsuits later
11:57
but we're really passionate about
11:59
clearing up
12:00
the misrepresentation of data that's
12:03
happened that has driven
12:04
the policy decisions by the states that
12:07
have caused more damage
12:08
in our belief than the disease itself
12:13
wonderful thank you for that
12:16
so we're very lucky to have our next
12:18
panelist state senator dennis
12:21
lyndon thickem he's been fighting for
12:23
his constituents for years but never
12:25
more than
12:26
he has during this crisis of inaccurate
12:28
data and lack of accountability
12:30
he has a message of hope and
12:31
encouragement that we hope you'll find
12:33
refreshing in an elected official
12:36
welcome senator
12:42
great it is so good to be here um and um
12:49
yeah we'd love for you to just speak on
12:51
a way for people
12:53
to you know no longer feel so
12:55
disconnected and powerless
12:56
what can they do to get involved in
12:58
their state
13:03
well it's interesting the first thing
13:05
people have to do is they actually have
13:07
to choose to get involved
13:10
a lot of people are watching today and
13:12
they're already part of this
13:13
and they're already involved and
13:15
regaining their respective freedoms
13:18
but many other people are curious just
13:20
how in the world do we get started
13:22
and then when you mix that in uh with
13:25
the evolution across the respective
13:27
states
13:28
and the myriad of different
13:30
circumstances that individuals will find
13:32
themselves in
13:34
it becomes quite a mix we all
13:37
are individuals we live in separate
13:38
communities some of us can find
13:41
like-minded groups and neighbors and
13:43
trade associations even political
13:46
parties
13:46
or elected officials and the most
13:49
important thing people can do
13:51
is reach out step up and get into this
13:54
mix because existing health policies
13:58
will be changed in the upcoming
14:00
legislative agendas across
14:02
all 50 states these items about medical
14:05
freedom
14:06
are on our doorstep and so the best
14:09
thing i can offer
14:11
to people is some insight some
14:13
principles that come from
14:15
our founding fathers and one of these
14:18
little quotes is
14:19
the price of freedom is eternal
14:21
vigilance
14:22
and by vigilance i mean you have to stay
14:24
alert you have to be careful you have to
14:26
watch for possible dangers
14:28
difficulty deceit and even betrayal and
14:32
it's an eternal quest it's one of these
14:34
things that
14:35
implies you have a duty and a
14:38
responsibility
14:39
an obligation and we're in it for the
14:41
long haul
14:42
and so people um have to kind of gird
14:45
themselves and this is a mental choice
14:47
that has to happen in their own hearts
14:49
and minds
14:50
and they have to choose to be involved
14:52
and
14:53
get ready for the information that we're
14:56
about to present today
14:58
because it's really quite mind-boggling
15:01
to see the amount of
15:02
corruption deceit misdirection and so
15:05
forth
15:06
that has been perpetrated by state
15:08
agencies and federal agencies
15:11
and so i look forward to participating
15:13
in this
15:15
conversation today wonderful thank you
15:17
so much senator
15:20
next we have dr james lyons wheeler who
15:24
is just a wonderful molecular geneticist
15:26
and expert on pcr
15:29
he's an award-winning author captivating
15:31
lecturer prodigious researcher i mean
15:33
he's got
15:34
incredible credentials and we are just
15:36
so happy you're here today
15:37
welcome dr jack thank you so much sarah
15:40
and i want to say hello to all the other
15:42
panelists and
15:43
it's an honor to be part of this thank
15:46
you i was hoping you could give us a
15:47
quick overview
15:49
to a question so many people have today
15:51
can the current pcr test tell if someone
15:54
is
15:54
infectious look the problem with using
15:57
pcr has been with us from the very
15:59
beginning
16:00
in um in february
16:03
cdc declined he adopted a test that
16:07
141 other countries adopted they
16:10
developed their own tests and shipped it
16:11
out as found to be flawed and that set
16:13
the united states back
16:15
two months in getting a reasonable
16:17
contact tracing and testing and then
16:20
the commercial entities were brought
16:21
online however
16:23
uh there must be so many people
16:26
colleagues of mine around the country
16:29
people that do pcr quantitative pcr
16:31
across the country that are just pulling
16:32
their hair out
16:34
hearing about this ct threshold
16:37
specifically as if there's one ct
16:40
threshold that can magically be used
16:42
for all the different kinds of pcr tests
16:44
for all of
16:45
the uh different levels of viremia
16:48
person might have the amount of viruses
16:50
and my initial inquiry into this found
16:53
that the cdc was talking about
16:55
talking out both sides of their mouth
16:57
they're saying that the test was too
16:58
sensitive
16:59
by dialing up the ct ct level all the
17:02
way up to
17:03
as high as 40 uh you're guaranteed a
17:05
high sensitivity
17:07
but you don't have specificity and the
17:08
fda never required
17:10
empirical estimation of specificity
17:13
that's the ability to not find the virus
17:15
when it's not there
17:16
or even the fragment of the virus later
17:18
on i'm going to go into great technical
17:20
detail and break down in high detail
17:22
exactly why the cdc should not and no
17:25
one should be using pcr at all
17:27
but i just want to uh end this little
17:30
segment here by saying that the college
17:31
of american pathologists
17:33
put out a publication saying it's not
17:35
reproducible there's too many factors
17:36
that affect the results
17:37
touch variation from test to test and
17:40
that it's not
17:41
fit for purpose dr singhang lee
17:44
published a thirty percent false
17:46
positive rate basil at all
17:48
in australia published 11
17:51
false positive rate and other
17:53
independent researchers looking at the
17:55
false positive rate
17:57
of quantitative prp rtpcr
18:00
report 20 to 50 percent and i was just
18:03
a witness in allegheny county in
18:05
pennsylvania near pittsburgh
18:07
where the state epidemiologist actually
18:09
put it in her writing in her written
18:11
testimony
18:12
uh and then testified orally that
18:15
there's zero false positives in the pcr
18:18
test
18:18
it's outs it's stunning the amount of
18:20
misinformation that's out there
18:22
take your time with pcr learn how it
18:25
works as
18:26
technically as technically as you can
18:28
it's not so complicated that people can
18:30
understand it look up videos of pcr
18:33
and how it works it's fascinating i run
18:35
pcr i used to teach it
18:37
it's not so complicated that we can't
18:39
get it right
18:41
that's amazing thank you so much for
18:43
that and listeners will be
18:45
learning a lot more about the
18:46
implications of this
18:48
uh wide margin of error if you will as
18:51
far
18:51
as the stats that emerged and of course
18:53
policy built upon that
18:56
our final panelists will be dr
18:59
henry ely he's a naturopathic doctor
19:02
minister teacher
19:03
author of over 200 publications
19:05
regarding evidence-based nutrition
19:07
and natural medicine he's invested over
19:10
three thousand hours of research
19:11
and leads a team of volunteers with over
19:13
twenty thousand collective hours of
19:15
investigation
19:17
into every aspect of covid available for
19:19
scientific review
19:22
dr ely is the lead author of the
19:24
peer-reviewed research paper
19:26
covid19 data collection comorbidity and
19:29
federal law
19:30
this is a must read and it's also he's
19:33
also the author of an upcoming
19:34
peer-reviewed research paper covid19
19:37
restoring public trust during a public
19:39
health crisis
19:41
welcome dr ely how are you doing say
19:44
it's so good to see you and be on this
19:46
show
19:46
oh it's such an honor truly i've been uh
19:48
really familiarizing myself with your
19:50
work and it's just
19:52
such an inspiration of course we
19:53
wouldn't be doing this here today if it
19:55
weren't for your work
19:56
uh can you can you briefly tell our
19:58
viewers how your team
20:00
figured out that the covet data was
20:02
being manipulated
20:04
uh well first of all i'm blushing a lot
20:06
thank you so much for the high praise
20:08
um i i think uh we started on
20:11
march 12th of last year uh that's where
20:14
we began our investigation we wanted to
20:16
understand what we could expect
20:18
so that we could do public service
20:19
announcement announcements for everybody
20:21
and just
20:22
keep people really calm because there
20:24
was so much fear going on so
20:26
we looked at the italian data data from
20:28
the italian ministry of health
20:29
we looked at the south korean data from
20:31
their cdc and we started to really
20:33
analyze
20:34
that data and our first clue when we
20:36
started to overlay the bell curves
20:38
sayer was the anomaly spikes in cases
20:41
here in the united states something
20:43
wasn't matching up so we said we got to
20:45
look deeper
20:46
state by state so then we had a major
20:49
breakthrough
20:50
when we went and we looked at and found
20:52
a huge variance
20:53
in fatalities between what the u.s was
20:56
saying
20:57
excuse me the cdc was saying for for the
20:59
u.s
21:00
specifically in the state of new york
21:02
and what the new york state department
21:04
of health was saying
21:05
so on april 30th the cdc was reporting
21:08
5 306 more fatalities than the new york
21:12
state department of health
21:13
and that number is only grown as of
21:15
yesterday that number is now
21:18
8496 the cdc for the state of new york
21:21
is reporting 8496 more fatalities than
21:25
the new york state department of health
21:27
so we wanted to know which number could
21:29
we trust which number
21:30
was right so curiously at the bottom of
21:32
the cdc's previous
21:34
website on covet tracking they had a
21:36
little link
21:37
to an april 15 document that document
21:41
was a position paper that they had
21:42
adopted
21:44
from the council of state and
21:45
territorial epidemiologists
21:47
and it was incredibly poorly conceived
21:50
in my
21:50
professional opinion there were very
21:52
loose criteria for diagnosis
21:54
they allowed the same person to be
21:56
counted over and over and over again as
21:58
new cases
21:59
but more importantly it was adopted by
22:01
the cdc without public comment
22:03
without peer review and without
22:04
notification in the federal register
22:07
which are required by federal law we
22:09
didn't know that at the time but our
22:10
research
22:11
ultimately led us there so at this point
22:13
we're super shocked right
22:15
and you know all this information is
22:17
hiding in plain sight
22:18
the data was clearly compromised and no
22:20
one at the state and federal level
22:21
seemed to care because we reached out to
22:23
them and we were trying to get them to
22:24
correct it but
22:25
nobody got back to us we were just
22:27
dismissed so we couldn't believe
22:29
that the cdc would outsource the
22:31
criteria for what constitutes a covet
22:33
case
22:34
you know to a non-profit organization
22:36
the council of state and territorial
22:37
epidemiologists they're not a federal
22:38
organization so we're like
22:40
something doesn't smell right so that
22:43
made us dig even deeper and it only
22:44
ultimately brought us to the cdc's
22:46
publication of the covid alert number
22:48
two document
22:49
that completely changed death
22:51
certificate reporting
22:53
but only for covet 19 and again without
22:57
public comment peer review or
22:59
notification
23:00
in the federal register as required by
23:02
federal law
23:03
so just to give everybody a background
23:05
for the previous 17 years all changes to
23:08
data collection
23:09
were first reported to the federal
23:11
register for oversight and public
23:13
comment that's the law
23:14
for the previous 17 years for all causes
23:17
of death death certificate reporting
23:19
was very different and under complete
23:22
discretion of the attending healthcare
23:24
professional it wasn't under the cdc
23:26
telling them what to do
23:28
but now with covid they're being told
23:30
what to do
23:31
they were being told to emphasize covid
23:33
even without a confirmed lab test
23:35
they were being told to simultaneously
23:37
de-emphasize chronic
23:39
comorbid pre-existing conditions that we
23:42
knew from the italian data and the south
23:44
korean data played a huge role
23:46
in patient outcomes and what we later
23:48
learned
23:49
was that these changes in death
23:50
certificate reporting were financially
23:53
incentivized to encourage compliance
23:54
something dr
23:55
scott jensen from minnesota senator out
23:58
of minnesota has
23:59
was vilified for and then ultimately he
24:01
was it was found to be accurate
24:03
everything he had said so
24:05
what we're hearing now sayer is that
24:07
public health officials keep
24:09
saying that minority communities are
24:11
being disproportionately impacted i just
24:12
read it on espn today
24:14
but what that implies is that covet is
24:16
impacting us
24:18
more than that then and that's just not
24:20
accurate
24:21
it's not accurate to say that covet is
24:23
impacting
24:24
minority communities more what's
24:26
accurate is to say that our communities
24:28
have a higher incidence of comorbid
24:30
conditions
24:31
because we're in a worse state of health
24:33
because that is due to systemic
24:36
socioeconomic educational health care
24:38
inequalities
24:39
these are things that are beyond dispute
24:41
and it's been going on for hundreds of
24:43
years
24:44
the sars cove ii virus air doesn't care
24:46
what color your skin is
24:48
it cares how little vitamin d you have
24:50
it cares how little vitamin c you have
24:52
it cares how little vitamin a and zinc
24:54
you have in your body to fight it
24:56
the sars cove ii virus is just another
24:59
opportunistic infection that preys upon
25:01
people who are nutritionally deficient
25:03
which tells us exactly what we need to
25:05
help everyone in our country
25:07
so by this point with everything that
25:10
we've researched
25:11
we know something is very wrong and
25:14
when we have inaccurate public health
25:16
narratives supplanting real science our
25:19
concerns skyrocket sayer so
25:21
we wrote a series of investigative
25:23
research papers we got the fourth one
25:25
peer review that's what we're going to
25:26
talk about today we got a fifth one on
25:28
the way and
25:29
tell you the truth we can't wait to get
25:30
started wow
25:32
thank you so much for that dr ely it's
25:34
uh incredibly inspiring
25:37
to you know witness yourself and all the
25:40
panelists today you know
25:42
put themselves on the line in this way
25:44
just dedicated to
25:46
you know providing the public accurate
25:48
information
25:49
despite political fallout and you know
25:53
your work
25:53
that paper really just blew my mind as i
25:56
know many of the
25:58
viewers when you take a look at you know
26:00
the two papers you put together
26:02
it really does show that what we
26:05
predicated an entire national lockdown
26:07
upon
26:08
and all of these interventions that are
26:11
so devastating
26:12
including social isolation or slash
26:15
distancing and mask wearing
26:18
what you're doing is helping to return
26:21
us to
26:21
basis of sanity and of course that is
26:24
what this event is all about
26:25
is making that information available um
26:28
would you have anything else to
26:30
contribute before we move on to the
26:32
round table just real quick say i
26:35
agree with you and i want everybody
26:37
watching this to be very clear our
26:39
intention is to collaborate
26:41
with public health officials our
26:42
intention is to collaborate with good
26:44
people in the cdc there are good people
26:46
in the cdc there are good people in
26:48
state health departments
26:49
there are good people at the county
26:51
levels and doctors out there we want to
26:53
collaborate with you and get this
26:54
information out
26:55
if we can put all this in for all this
26:57
money behind promoting
26:59
the experimental biologics we can
27:01
promote vitamin d
27:02
as well it just it just makes sense
27:04
doesn't it
27:05
absolutely i mean all we're asking for
27:08
is that the
27:09
laws that were already in place federal
27:12
law
27:12
was basically not observed or violated
27:15
and in this case
27:16
the implication was it affected the
27:18
lives of tens of millions
27:20
in a significantly adverse way so this
27:23
is a
27:23
true call for sanity clarity and also
27:26
cooperation
27:27
among those individuals that are paid by
27:30
the taxpayer
27:31
and some who are elected that are
27:33
supposed to be watching out for the
27:35
public health so we are partnering with
27:37
those individuals as well
27:38
not necessarily in opposition to them so
27:41
once again
27:42
thank you so much for your contribution
27:44
so we will be starting next with
27:47
our first round table which will involve
27:50
dr martin
27:51
anna garner senator senator uh lintichum
27:55
and we will be starting here
27:58
with dr martin now dr martin we were
28:02
reviewing your dossier on dr falchi and
28:04
some very concerning historical events
28:06
began to show up
28:08
how long have you been investigating the
28:09
events that led up to kobe 19
28:11
and the timeline you've constructed what
28:14
events and facts have stood out to you
28:16
as illegal
28:19
so if you wouldn't mind telling us about
28:21
that
28:22
yeah well my organization mcam has been
28:26
monitoring all of the potential
28:30
and actual violations of biological and
28:33
chemical weapons research
28:35
since 1999 we began that investigation
28:40
and in 1999 we were alerted to a very
28:42
interesting
28:44
problem which was a problem that was
28:47
conducting research that was
28:49
specifically targeting
28:51
amplifying the pathogenicity of beta
28:54
coronaviruses
28:55
there was a specific objective in the
28:57
research that was going on from 1999 to
29:00
2002
29:01
which was actually quite alarming and
29:02
resulted ultimately in a patent issued
29:04
to the university of north carolina
29:06
chapel hill
29:07
that patent covered the specific
29:10
applications
29:11
of modifying properties of coronavirus
29:14
so that it infected
29:15
human lung tissue and that
29:18
particular problem predates as you know
29:21
the first stars outbreak
29:23
by a year so ironic that
29:26
we went for potentially you know
29:29
tens of thousands of years with
29:31
beta-corone viruses which were
29:32
nothing more than a slight inconvenience
29:35
we start manipulating that virus
29:37
and within a very short period of time
29:40
we find ourselves
29:41
with sars outbreak 1.0
29:44
and then something far worse happened
29:48
in 2003 after the asian outbreak
29:51
of the first round of the sars disease
29:55
the
29:55
severe acute respiratory syndrome
29:57
disease a series of patents were filed
30:00
by the
30:00
united states center for disease control
30:02
and prevention and
30:04
ironically they had already published
30:06
the genome
30:08
of sars coronavirus and it was in the
30:09
public domain
30:11
but over the objections
30:14
twice of the patent office who
30:16
invalidated the application twice
30:19
the cdc ultimately in 2007 received a
30:22
patent on the genome of sars coronavirus
30:25
and its detection and its treatment
30:28
what was equally alarming was during
30:30
that same period of time
30:31
university of north carolina chapel hill
30:33
and others continued their work on
30:36
amplifying the pathogenicity of this
30:38
particular virus and it made no sense
30:40
that we would actually go down the
30:41
pathway of taking
30:43
a viral model and amplifying the harm
30:47
that it could do to humans
30:48
in research environments and then being
30:50
surprised that sometimes it showed up as
30:52
harming humans
30:54
um that didn't feel like that odd of a
30:57
thing and then
30:58
then an alarming thing happened so in
31:00
2003 we published a report that was sent
31:02
to law enforcement intelligence agencies
31:04
around the world
31:06
to highlight this risk and in that
31:08
report we actually made reference to the
31:10
fact that this was not just a u.s risk
31:12
but a chinese risk
31:14
we made a series of published reports we
31:17
presented those to
31:18
organizations around the world and then
31:21
a very alarming thing happened
31:23
and and this was an event in february of
31:26
2016.
31:28
this is after we recognized that the
31:32
national science foundation
31:34
had instituted a moratorium on gain of
31:36
function research this was after
31:38
all of the federal funding for gain of
31:40
function research
31:42
was actually put under that moratorium
31:45
peter dascheck of eco health alliance
31:47
who we all
31:49
have now come to know and love as as the
31:51
guy who funneled
31:53
several million dollars of u.s taxpayer
31:55
dollars to the wuhan institute of
31:56
virology
31:58
made the following statement and i'm
31:59
quoting from
32:01
2016. he said we need to increase public
32:05
understanding of the need for medical
32:06
countermeasures
32:08
such as a pan influenza and pan
32:10
coronavirus vaccine
32:11
this is 2016. he then said a key
32:15
driver and this is a quote a key driver
32:18
is the media
32:19
and the economics will follow the hype
32:23
i want to just recite that quote one
32:26
more time just so it sinks in
32:28
this is the guy who by the way just
32:30
recently led a world health organization
32:32
investigation
32:33
into whether or not we actually know
32:35
where this patent
32:36
this sar cov2 virus came from in china
32:40
that guy made this statement
32:43
a key driver is the media and the
32:45
economics will follow the hype
32:48
we need to use that hype to our
32:50
advantage to get to the real issues and
32:52
he went on to describe what the real
32:53
issues were which are the establishment
32:56
of a protocol
32:57
to get a pan coronavirus vaccine that
33:00
was in 2016.
33:01
during the exact same period of time the
33:04
wuhan institute of virology viral
33:07
model was published in a proceeding that
33:10
was
33:11
senior authored by ralph barrick that
33:13
said that the coronavirus in wuhan was
33:15
poised for human emergence once again in
33:18
2016.
33:20
so these are not 2019 pieces of data
33:23
this is 2016
33:24
and the model they used was actually a
33:26
model that mimics
33:28
a hundred percent of the co-vid symptoms
33:30
in chinese patients in 2012 and 2013.
33:34
so what we call covid19 and what we call
33:38
sars parentavirus is where we have to
33:40
make sure that we are careful in this
33:42
conversation like in every other
33:43
conversation
33:45
because in february when the world
33:47
health organization made its declaration
33:49
that there was a novel coronavirus which
33:52
in and of itself
33:53
is somewhat illusory there are multiple
33:56
models of multiple variants and multiple
33:58
mutations
33:59
but when they said that there was a
34:01
novel virus that was a false statement
34:04
and then they said that there was a
34:06
novel disease called
34:07
covid19 that was also a false statement
34:10
in fact all of the clinical
34:11
presentations
34:12
that are currently listed as covid19
34:14
clinical presentations were seen
34:16
in china in patients from whom the wuhan
34:20
virus
34:20
was isolated in 2013 and 2014
34:24
and was chimerically altered in 2016 at
34:27
the university of north carolina chapel
34:28
hill
34:29
so there is not a single thing about
34:31
what we've been told is
34:32
novel or new that is either
34:35
novel or new and most problematic
34:39
the causal statements that gave rise to
34:41
every declaration of a state of
34:43
emergency across this country and around
34:45
the world
34:45
is based on a false premise and that
34:48
false premise very simply states
34:51
that sars cov2 causes
34:55
covid19 now let's get really precise on
34:58
what that means
34:59
that means that there's a causality
35:01
relationship that's what that
35:03
word very simply means the tiny problem
35:06
was
35:07
and remains that the presence of the
35:10
virus does not beget symptoms
35:13
in many if not most individuals exposed
35:17
to some fragment of the virus
35:19
so the causality argument is not
35:21
supported by the data
35:23
but more problematic many patients
35:26
who were classified as having covid19
35:30
had no biochemical assessment of any
35:33
kind
35:34
forget rt pcr or any other diagnostic
35:37
procedure they actually were counted as
35:39
having coven 19
35:40
purely on clinical presentation alone
35:43
now
35:44
what makes that a problem is that
35:46
despite all of their
35:48
assertions or assertions to the contrary
35:51
the biggest problem we have right now
35:54
is that when the cdc fights on whether
35:57
or not covet is
35:58
over counted or under counted what they
36:00
conflate
36:02
is the viral test and the actual
36:05
clinical presentation of disease
36:08
and what we are led to believe is that
36:10
somehow or another everybody who's
36:12
exposed
36:12
somehow to a positive test
36:16
is somehow also infected or
36:19
harmed in a clinical sense and the
36:22
problem with the data
36:23
is that those two things the world
36:25
health organization in february
36:27
made a public statement saying that we
36:29
should not in public
36:31
conflate these two things and then from
36:34
that day forward
36:35
every governor every public health
36:37
officer everybody who is
36:39
part of the cdc data promulgation
36:42
the covid tracking project which is
36:44
funded by michael bloomberg
36:46
bill gates and the zuckerberg foundation
36:50
all of these organizations have
36:52
willfully conflated
36:54
this notion of viral exposure to the
36:57
clinical symptoms associated
36:59
with covid19 so our concern is very
37:02
simple
37:02
this was actually a commercial venture
37:04
when it started
37:06
it was controlled centrally by the cdc
37:08
and the national institutes of health
37:10
and ultimately the department of health
37:11
and human services they are the
37:13
financial beneficiaries
37:14
and their colleagues and their
37:16
commercial partners are the ones
37:18
profiteering
37:19
on the back of the manipulation of this
37:20
information
37:22
thank you dr martin uh miss garner what
37:24
do you think about what you
37:26
just listened to i think it's rather
37:30
shocking
37:30
and it's consistent with the information
37:32
that we had learned
37:34
about our lawsuits we know that
37:37
this has been in the making for a very
37:39
long time
37:40
uh not only have they misrepresented
37:44
that this was a novel virus
37:46
and a novel disease but they have
37:48
misrepresented that
37:50
that that there's a pandemic they have
37:53
misrepresented that there is a public
37:54
health emergency that require
37:56
all of these drastic measures like
37:59
lockdowns
38:00
and school closures and business
38:02
closures and the like uh
38:05
they've also what they've also done is
38:08
really um
38:09
distort plain and ordinary meaning of
38:12
words
38:13
they call a positive pcr test a case or
38:17
an infection
38:18
they say covid related dance they say
38:20
you know all of this is designed to just
38:22
incite fear and hysteria amongst the
38:25
public
38:26
and this is exactly what's been done
38:28
they also
38:29
you know we know that there was an event
38:30
201 in october of 2019
38:33
that was pandemic preparedness put on by
38:36
the world economic forum
38:38
and the bill and melinda gates
38:39
foundation and that also implicated
38:42
dr fauci and some of his groups so we
38:44
know that this has been in the works for
38:46
a long time
38:47
they predicted it they said it would
38:49
happen and it did happen and we need to
38:51
get
38:51
underneath the narrative in the story
38:54
and expose this for what it is
38:56
so thank you thank you for that
38:59
senator uh what do you think all about
39:01
this
39:05
well yeah the information that dr
39:08
martin presented is quite alarming and
39:11
it shines a bright light on potential
39:13
immoral and unethical actions that have
39:15
been taken by governments and
39:17
bureaucrats and powerful well-money
39:19
corporations
39:20
yet at the heart of it it should be
39:22
obvious that a real problem
39:24
stems from bureaucrats and status
39:26
politicians
39:27
these are the individuals who create and
39:30
manage
39:31
and promote public policy and they've
39:34
been
39:34
effectively hiding their true objectives
39:37
and
39:37
masking their policies keeping the
39:40
public in
39:41
the unsuspecting public in the dark was
39:44
this done by
39:45
accident was it an honest mistake is it
39:48
the result of endless appetite for
39:50
status or notoriety or
39:52
probably personal gain in particular
39:55
what we
39:56
just heard from dr martin and this is
39:58
why we are here today
40:00
is there exists the very real policy
40:04
the very real possibility that public
40:07
health
40:08
has been compromised and public health
40:11
has been harmed
40:12
by government corruption these powerful
40:15
corporations and influential people have
40:17
created a turbulent environment
40:20
for everybody in the marketplace for
40:22
policy makers for bureaucrats for
40:24
individuals who have been caught in
40:27
lockdowns
40:28
and in so doing they have potentially
40:30
violated their responsibility
40:33
under the information quality act by
40:35
enriching stakeholders themselves
40:38
and their political puppets or
40:40
corporations
40:41
this is a big big deal and dr martin has
40:44
plenty more than his little five minutes
40:47
here in this uh episode and i suggest
40:51
you go to his
40:52
website to see all the details
40:55
thank you so much for that senator uh dr
40:57
martin
40:58
what encouragement and advice can you
41:00
give our viewers
41:02
well i think one of the most important
41:04
things to do is and
41:05
and obviously the reason why i'm sharing
41:08
my evening with with all of you is
41:10
for a very simple reason this is not a
41:13
unique situation
41:14
but being informed is absolutely
41:16
essential the
41:17
idea of participating in any democratic
41:20
system
41:21
anywhere on earth requires education
41:24
and that requires the capacity to make
41:27
independent inquiry
41:29
one of the things that i find most
41:31
alarming
41:32
is the degree to which we are being
41:34
asked to accept or believe
41:36
information because it's fed to us by a
41:39
headline
41:39
or by a public health official or by
41:42
someone
41:42
who's standing behind a lectern my goal
41:45
has
41:46
always been and has been throughout the
41:48
last now 20 plus years
41:50
my goal is to actually help people find
41:53
the sources of information to make their
41:55
own informed decision and so if i
41:58
had one take away from this it's a
42:02
make sure you source information to
42:04
inform yourself
42:05
number one but number two and equally
42:08
important be very aware of the fact
42:10
that we've identified seven additional
42:12
pathogens
42:13
for which this exact template has been
42:16
queued
42:17
so this is actually not a lone
42:21
event this is actually something for
42:23
which a model
42:24
is being built and tested and it is
42:27
incumbent on us
42:28
to understand that that needs to be
42:30
disrupted before
42:31
more harm is done thank you so much for
42:35
that and
42:36
fellow panelists uh this has been such a
42:38
helpful
42:39
uh explanation for an alternative motive
42:43
for what otherwise would
42:44
appear to be a wild or natural
42:47
event and i think that's essentially
42:49
what people are looking for is the type
42:52
of
42:52
historical information and context
42:56
that you're providing here so we can
42:58
really make
42:59
informed decisions without which consent
43:02
is not
43:02
possible and that is a fundamental
43:05
medical ethical principle
43:07
that we absolutely we need to
43:10
have access to as free uh
43:13
individuals our next round table will be
43:17
dr ely dr jack and commissioner
43:20
us starrett so we are going to start
43:24
with dr early
43:25
your team's peer-reviewed research paper
43:28
is a focal point for this event
43:30
and for our call to action at the end of
43:32
the event
43:34
how did this paper come into being how
43:36
accurate is the fatality data being
43:38
reported by our public health
43:40
authorities and the media
43:42
well sarah thank you for those questions
43:45
first of all how did this come into
43:46
being it came into
43:47
being because good people asked
43:50
questions
43:51
and didn't take a narrative for the
43:53
answer and as we
43:55
kept asking questions we kept connecting
43:57
we kept
43:58
asking other people to verify what we
44:00
had found
44:01
we made sure attorneys verified it we
44:03
made sure scientists verified it we made
44:06
sure
44:06
colleagues verified it doctors licensed
44:09
doctors we
44:10
made sure that what we were saying was
44:13
accurate before we came out with it
44:15
because the way something like this
44:17
comes about is when people come together
44:19
and care that's what happens so
44:22
what i want to share with everybody uh
44:25
is a quick
44:26
um a quick look at some information some
44:28
screenshots that i think is
44:30
is going to be uh very telling
44:34
so the first thing i want to do is
44:36
substantiate what i had said earlier
44:38
that
44:38
as of february 16th there is a variance
44:41
of 8496 fatalities
44:44
between what the cdc is reporting for
44:46
the state of new york and you can see
44:47
the screen capture right here and what
44:50
the
44:51
new york state department of health is
44:53
reporting for total fatalities folks
44:55
i got you have to understand this cannot
44:57
happen
44:58
a variance of 10 15 fatalities between
45:02
the cdc and a state sure
45:04
right because the way it's supposed to
45:05
work is the counties report to the state
45:07
the state reports to the cdc
45:10
but when you have a growing variance
45:12
over
45:13
that has been going on since april 30th
45:15
that has now reached 8496
45:18
it calls into question your ability to
45:20
do something very simple
45:23
basic math right it calls into question
45:26
how does this take place why is there
45:28
such a variance i still don't have an
45:30
answer to that today
45:31
other than to say it's wrong when we
45:34
look at the cdc's data all the data i'm
45:36
about to share with you comes directly
45:38
from the cdc's data tracker
45:40
here are the number of cases per age
45:43
demographic one of my
45:44
big things that i've been screaming
45:46
about sayer is we have to stop
45:48
looking at this as aggregate data across
45:51
for everybody we have to look at this
45:53
based upon age
45:54
stratification we have to look at this
45:56
in the 0 to 17 age range
45:59
where we've had in over a year 298 total
46:02
fatalities a fatality rate of 0.013
46:06
percent which means that
46:07
the estimated recovery rate for our kids
46:09
is 99.987 percent
46:12
in the in the age 18 to 49 range we
46:15
apparently have and i'm going to start
46:17
saying apparently based upon what dr
46:18
martin just shared
46:20
we apparently have 11 million cases but
46:23
only 15 000 fatalities for a fatality
46:26
rate of 0.14
46:28
percent again this is the cdc's own data
46:31
folks that makes a recovery rate an
46:33
estimated recovery rate of 99.859
46:36
percent all right and it's and it's
46:38
still held even
46:39
all the way through the 50 to 64 age
46:42
demographic our problem demographics
46:44
have been have always been age 65 to 74
46:48
and 75 and older and we knew that sayer
46:51
all the way back
46:52
as early as march 9th when the cdc
46:55
published a
46:56
a statement through cnbc.com
46:59
we've known that our most at risk
47:02
weren't going to be because of a
47:03
person's skin color or ethnicity
47:05
but it was going to be because of age
47:07
and comorbid conditions
47:09
and it's played out in the data and it's
47:11
been playing out in the data
47:12
i can't wrap my head sayer around the
47:15
idea
47:16
i can't wrap my head around the idea
47:18
that for everybody
47:19
under 65 years of age they have a
47:22
recovery rate of 99.623 percent
47:25
but for some reason we can't be bedside
47:28
next to the people we love when they're
47:29
hospitalized my cousin was just
47:31
hospitalized last night and his woman
47:34
couldn't be
47:34
by his bedside when he was recovering
47:37
from a
47:38
seizure and they asked him medical
47:40
related questions and he had to give
47:42
answers after coming out of a seizure
47:44
it's unconscionable
47:46
sayer for that to happen and it just
47:48
happened last night
47:50
now what i want to share with everybody
47:52
watching is this
47:53
there was a document the nvss covid
47:57
19 alert number two because i'm going to
47:58
take some heat on this i already know i
48:00
am right speaking out you're going to
48:02
take some heat but this is the document
48:04
that
48:05
changed how certificate of death
48:07
reporting occurred
48:08
okay and this was issued on march 24
48:10
2020 last year
48:11
published by the cdc on behalf of the
48:14
nvss the nvss is a
48:16
national vital statistics system what
48:19
they wanted to do
48:20
was they wanted to tell their their
48:22
death certifiers
48:24
what coveted will covet 19 be the
48:26
underlying cause
48:27
the underlying cause depends on what and
48:30
where conditions are reported on the
48:32
death certificate
48:33
however the rules for coding and
48:35
selection of the underlying cause of
48:37
death are expected
48:39
to result in coven 19 being the
48:41
underlying cause more often than not
48:43
isn't that a little quinky dink right
48:45
and here's this other thing
48:47
should covet 19 be reported on the death
48:49
certificate only with a confirmed test
48:51
the answer for most of us doctors is
48:53
yeah
48:54
but look at their answer here sayer
48:56
coven 19 should be reported on the death
48:58
certificate for all decedents where
49:00
the disease caused or is assumed to have
49:03
caused or contributed to death really
49:06
assumed
49:07
certifiers should include as much detail
49:09
as possible based upon their knowledge
49:11
of the case medical records
49:13
laboratory testing etc if
49:16
the decedent had other chronic
49:18
conditions such as copd or asthma
49:20
that may have also contributed these
49:22
conditions can be reported in part two
49:24
sayer here's the big deal about that
49:26
that is not the way that was done for
49:29
the previous 17
49:30
years comorbid pre-existing conditions
49:32
were always
49:33
tracked in part one not part two big big
49:37
change right there
49:38
this should have been reported to the
49:40
federal register this
49:41
should have been open for public comment
49:44
we should have had an
49:45
opportunity to review this and say hey
49:48
there's some problems with this
49:50
this guidance you're you're issuing
49:52
right here it's not going to work for
49:53
these reasons
49:54
but we weren't afforded that opportunity
49:56
they just pushed it through
49:58
so i want to show your i want to show
50:00
your your audience right here
50:01
i want to show them a covet 19
50:05
death certificate versus a influenza h1
50:08
in one death certificate if everything's
50:10
the exact same
50:12
if the person is the same the only
50:14
difference is covet 19 versus h1n1 you
50:16
ready for this there
50:18
if we look on the left we see that a
50:21
person
50:22
70 who 77 year old male 10 year history
50:25
of hypertension
50:26
and chronic obstructive pulmonary
50:27
disease copd
50:29
and then he passes away due to coven 19.
50:32
they're going to list acute respiratory
50:34
acidosis for three days and covet 19 for
50:37
one week
50:37
and then the things that really
50:39
contributed to his death that
50:40
were the causative uh factors for his uh
50:44
demise
50:44
they're gonna put down here in part b
50:46
and and de-emphasize him
50:48
but if that same guy sayer that same 77
50:51
year old male
50:53
died instead of covid inf
50:56
he died from influenza h1n1 look at how
50:59
different
50:59
his cause of death his death certificate
51:01
is going to look it's going to look like
51:03
cardiac arrest resulting from acute
51:05
respiratory acidosis
51:06
hypertension is going to be mentioned in
51:08
part one copd is going to be mentioned
51:11
in part one
51:12
and then h1n1 can be still being part
51:14
one it's what's called
51:16
in the uh in the handbook that the cdc
51:18
publishes an initiating factor
51:20
okay but most doctors would actually put
51:23
it in part two because they
51:25
understand well he's 77
51:28
he had multiple comorbidities
51:31
h1n1 didn't kill him it was
51:34
the pre-existing conditions that played
51:37
a larger role in his negative outcome
51:39
and that's but that's been taken away
51:42
sayer from
51:42
our our medical professionals our
51:45
coroners our
51:46
our medical examiners are our physicians
51:48
it's been taken away from them by this
51:50
document this previous document here
51:52
and saying it's got to be coveted and
51:54
here's really the thing that gets my
51:56
gills
51:57
say here they were financially
51:59
incentivized
52:01
to do it that's the part that's
52:03
unethical
52:04
and unacceptable so what i'm going to
52:07
take some heat on
52:09
and i'm ready to take the heat on it
52:10
okay but what i'm going to take some
52:12
heat on
52:13
is this graphic right here that's
52:15
starting to make the national rounds
52:16
okay i'm glad we're having the
52:17
conversation
52:18
i'm just glad we're finally talking
52:20
about this really sayer okay
52:22
because if we had used the
52:25
guidelines that we had been using
52:27
without any problems for the previous 17
52:30
years
52:30
for these death certificate coding if we
52:32
had just used
52:34
if we had just used those our assertion
52:37
is that
52:38
the total fatality count due to covid19
52:42
caused by covet 19 would be roughly
52:44
about 21 000
52:46
americans instead of the 348
52:50
000 that the cdc is publishing in their
52:53
provisional accounts which is all i go
52:54
to i don't go to their other ones
52:56
because
52:56
they can't even get basic math right for
52:59
the state of new york
53:00
so i can't trust that does that make
53:01
sense right i can't trust that
53:04
so what we're saying here is this how
53:07
many
53:07
deaths were caused by covid we don't
53:10
know and that's a problem
53:11
how many deaths did kovitt contribute to
53:14
we don't know
53:15
and that's a problem how many deaths
53:17
were due to core morbidities initiated
53:20
by the tsar's covetous virus we don't
53:22
know and that's a problem
53:24
so what we and and to throw a no another
53:27
monkey wrench in the monkey wrenches we
53:30
don't
53:30
know now after december 13th how many of
53:33
these fatalities
53:34
involve the covid experimental vaccines
53:38
which are still in phase 3 clinical
53:41
trial according to the nih
53:43
right we don't know these things so we
53:45
have this incredibly muddied waters
53:47
um we need ser an independent audit
53:51
of all death certificates and we have
53:54
we my team has put together a formula
53:56
where we can incorporate
53:58
the medical history the ct values from
54:00
any pcr testing
54:01
and we can organize these into three
54:04
distinct categories
54:05
people who died due to covid people who
54:08
died
54:09
because of a covet involvement but due
54:12
to
54:12
comorbid conditions and people who are
54:14
just
54:15
miscategorized completely and likely
54:17
because of its financial incentives
54:19
and co and say or just a final thought
54:21
on this
54:22
you know we have there we have laws for
54:26
a reason
54:27
the information quality act the
54:29
paperwork reduction act
54:30
the administrative procedures act we
54:32
have we have these things for a reason
54:35
because when we don't follow these laws
54:38
data gets compromised and people die as
54:42
a result
54:42
people suffer as a result and it's got
54:45
to stop
54:45
enough suffering it's got to stop wow
54:49
thank you so much for that summarization
54:51
this
54:52
was the primary reason why when those
54:55
new codes came out and there they
54:57
removed the requirement for testing for
55:00
virus
55:00
and just suspicion was all that was
55:02
required to
55:04
label someone dead from covid that
55:07
i also i was shocked and to see you come
55:10
through
55:10
with your colleagues to produce this
55:12
paper and now
55:13
shed all the factual light and shed
55:16
light on the
55:17
legal uh violations if you will that
55:20
made that happen
55:21
it's just so so appreciated uh
55:24
commissioner as an elected official what
55:26
do you think about what you just
55:28
listened to
55:29
thank you sir well i do appreciate dr
55:31
ely's work and it certainly opened my
55:33
eyes
55:34
i think the most important thing i i
55:36
would take away from this
55:38
is if we remember to work with the
55:39
willing that we're seeing more and more
55:41
coalitions of people from
55:43
all different political perspectives
55:45
coming together to ask some questions
55:47
because they're saying
55:48
something just isn't right it doesn't
55:51
feel right and even on that level we can
55:53
then start to look for the information
55:55
when we get the information presented to
55:57
us then we can start to take action
56:00
and the biggest thing that people can
56:02
have to remember
56:03
is that there has to be that consistent
56:05
process that dr early just mentioned
56:08
it can't be selective and it can't be
56:10
pick and choose when you want to follow
56:11
the process
56:12
it needs to be followed and there needs
56:14
to be accountability and transparency
56:16
and that's where your elected officials
56:17
need to be held accountable
56:19
for following those processes that are
56:21
in statute and in law
56:24
thank you so much commissioner dr jack
56:27
i'm sure you have a lot to add
56:28
from an ethical and scientific
56:30
perspective like what concerns about
56:32
this
56:33
do you have if it's proven true right so
56:36
back to the question about how this all
56:37
came about
56:39
through networking i came to to
56:42
understand that dr ely and colleagues
56:43
had some
56:44
compelling results that they just
56:46
couldn't understand they weren't making
56:48
any sense out of it and i invited the
56:50
paper
56:50
to the journal science public health
56:52
policy and the law
56:54
as editor-in-chief this is not my first
56:56
stint as editor-in-chief i founded the
56:58
journal cancer informatics
57:00
and i was associate editor of applied
57:02
bioinformatics
57:04
i serve on numerous editorial boards on
57:07
a number of
57:08
scientific journals i served for a long
57:10
time on the journal cancer research a
57:12
very
57:13
uh feather in my cap i'm very proud of
57:15
that service that i conducted
57:17
and today i peer reviewed two papers and
57:19
journals you'll probably never hear
57:20
about
57:21
i put a lot of time and effort and
57:23
energy into making sure that the science
57:24
that goes forward is validated
57:27
it's vetted it's looked at as dr ely
57:30
suggested by experts i sent the paper
57:33
out for blinded
57:34
peer review to this day dr ely and
57:36
colleagues have no idea
57:38
who reviewed his paper and in fact the
57:40
peer review standards
57:42
of the journal science public health
57:44
policy meet or exceeds those
57:47
of journals like the new england journal
57:49
of medicine
57:50
so it's although it's not registered as
57:52
just was reported today
57:54
in usa today with pubmed and these kinds
57:57
of organizations
57:59
that's because we don't yet have the
58:00
steam pubmed has a particular pace of
58:03
publication that we're not up to
58:05
and we also only publish by invitation
58:07
and there's a good reason for that now
58:09
if somebody has a problem with dr
58:10
riley's paper
58:11
and think there's something wrong with
58:13
that analysis you can contact me
58:15
and submit your own re-analysis and i'll
58:18
put it out to peer review just like his
58:20
that's called rational discourse but
58:22
here's my assessment
58:24
i understand the thousands of hours that
58:26
all of us are putting into this
58:28
right so dr ely's doing research on this
58:30
i'm doing my own independent research on
58:32
this and
58:32
when we get to my slides i think that's
58:34
in the next round table right or do i do
58:36
it now
58:37
um next round table next one um
58:41
when when when we're doing this kind of
58:43
research right
58:44
we have to understand that we're
58:46
guessing at motivation
58:48
so i might differ a little bit with dr
58:50
martin respectfully
58:51
deeply respectfully respect all the work
58:53
that he did on it i think cdc
58:56
shipped out the flawed test and by
58:58
shipping out the flawed test they
58:59
realized that the only way they had a
59:01
chance of getting hold of this was to
59:02
create the scenario where the
59:04
sensitivity of the test was
59:06
100 they have to catch every case every
59:08
time they test it
59:09
right but they forgot and i believe they
59:12
totally forgot that when the prevalence
59:14
is low
59:14
when you do that you ramp up the false
59:17
positive rate it's done at a cost to
59:19
sensitivity there's a
59:20
there's a seesaw effect the more that
59:22
you test
59:23
at the beginning because you have small
59:25
numbers of cases and you're doing
59:26
contact racing that's fine
59:28
but my other analysis and peer review
59:30
and other journals show that when you do
59:31
this kind of thing
59:33
and you change to indiscriminate testing
59:36
and you start testing anybody
59:37
any day just because you want to test
59:39
them when the prevalence is low you end
59:41
up with
59:42
way too many false positives and so then
59:44
you start start shutting down society
59:46
it all goes back to cdc making the
59:48
mistake of shifting and shipping out
59:50
that flawed test
59:51
in their rush right they came up with a
59:54
brand new way of dealing with this that
59:55
was never been seen before
59:57
i've been fact checked the fact checking
59:59
websites have it wrong
60:01
yes this paper has been fact checked dr
60:04
elie
60:05
and colleagues did in fact identify
60:07
substantial word differences
60:10
between what was happening before calvin
60:13
19 and after in terms of
60:16
uh attribution of not just attribution
60:18
of death but diagnosis of
60:20
of disease as well so remember
60:23
dr deborah burks in april made the
60:25
announcement that contrary to how
60:27
other countries are doing it cdc is
60:29
going to count
60:30
died with as died from
60:34
no matter what they died from literally
60:36
a blanket
60:38
a blanket determination of death as if
60:41
we have one
60:42
coroner working in the united states one
60:44
person determining the cause of death
60:46
across all states all counties all
60:49
deaths
60:49
if you have a positive result on your
60:52
test and you die
60:53
you died from coving now put on on top
60:56
of that that the false positive rates
60:57
might be as high as 11
60:59
or 20 or 50 percent then we have a real
61:02
problem it's a technical problem it can
61:04
be reversed
61:05
and we're seeing that the world health
61:07
organization said yeah oops
61:09
january 21st the world health
61:12
organization said yes
61:13
we dialed it up too high with ct's this
61:16
high we're going to have to dial it back
61:18
the department of health of the state of
61:20
kansas now has said it we're going to
61:22
dial it back we're going to bring these
61:23
universal seed
61:24
it's still the wrong approach you're
61:26
supposed to use a negative control
61:27
every patient every time calculate the
61:29
ct for that patient
61:30
and then calculate the negative control
61:32
ct and take the difference it's called
61:34
delta ct
61:35
it blows my mind that we're not seeing
61:37
delta delta ct
61:39
or delta ct in the literature we're
61:41
seeing a single threshold that doesn't
61:43
make any sense clinical whatsoever
61:45
so that's what went wrong in my opinion
61:47
they set the dial to 100
61:49
sensitivity they gave us a bunch of
61:50
false positives and then they're like
61:52
okay well you know what we're doing in
61:53
the name of good
61:54
we don't want to miss any because the
61:56
cost of the false negatives
61:58
are so high this thing will get away
61:59
from us they forgot about the cost of
62:01
the false
62:02
positives they forgot about the suicides
62:05
the deaths of despair
62:06
the hundreds of thousands of businesses
62:08
that have been shut down
62:09
the the teen suicide rate is an
62:11
unacceptable public health tragedy right
62:14
now in the united states of america
62:16
and unless until we have a a bear all
62:20
cdc come clean and say you know what
62:22
you're right
62:23
dr lionsweiler has it right we did it in
62:26
the in out of the best interest of the
62:27
country and we made a mistake
62:29
now we can start putting the country
62:30
back together but are they going to do
62:32
it
62:32
i doubt it it's the perverse incentives
62:34
that dr martin talked about
62:36
that places them in a position where
62:37
they should not be responsible for our
62:40
public health
62:41
anymore that's why i've created plan b
62:44
plan b is a decentralization b
62:46
depolitization
62:48
and de-incentivization of public health
62:50
in the united states
62:51
look up my name look up hashtag plan b
62:54
and
62:54
you'll see that i i want a big serious
62:57
sea change in the united states
62:59
amazing dr jack i also took a look at
63:02
your plan b i encourage
63:03
everyone to read this document i mean
63:05
you've provided a solution to this
63:07
systemic
63:08
problem that we're identifying today
63:10
thank you so much
63:11
uh dr ely what encouragement and advice
63:14
do you give
63:15
our viewers they're listening well
63:18
um i i i think number one is um
63:21
don't believe fact checkers fact
63:23
checkers are just opinions
63:25
you know masquerading as as we know
63:27
everything
63:29
the only way to fact check our work is
63:31
to do an independent audit of every
63:33
single death certificate and get it
63:35
proper get them properly categorized and
63:37
we
63:37
welcome that i will i will drive
63:40
fly swim to dc if you need me to
63:43
participate in that
63:45
anybody listening at the cdc i will do
63:48
it i'll be there
63:49
because we want to get this right we
63:51
need if you're going to make good
63:52
decisions my dad drilled this into me
63:54
for my whole life son if you need if
63:57
you're going to make good decisions you
63:58
need to make have accurate data most
64:00
people can't add sun and you need to
64:02
know how to add
64:03
dad you're right i'm i you were right
64:05
about all this that's why we're
64:07
that's why we're here right because we
64:09
need that accurate data
64:10
um so i would say if you want to fact
64:13
check me
64:14
i'm with you let's fact check it by
64:16
getting an
64:17
independent audit of every single death
64:20
certificate with medical history with
64:22
the company
64:23
our pcr cts and when they got a positive
64:26
single
64:26
signal for it get let's get all that
64:28
data and get it right because we need to
64:30
get it right because this can never
64:32
happen again thank you so much for that
64:35
absolutely we're asking for
64:38
transparency we're asking that our
64:40
federal
64:41
agencies do their job that they're
64:43
tasked
64:44
with and that's all it's very simple so
64:47
thank you so much panelists
64:49
we're going to move to round three and
64:51
this is going to include dr bregen
64:53
superintendent fieldman and of course
64:55
commissioner starrett
64:57
and we are going to start with dr bregen
64:59
thank you welcome back here
65:02
it seems undeniable at this point that
65:03
millions of people have become
65:05
trapped in a web of collateral damage
65:07
during covet 19.
65:09
you've been investigating this and
65:10
particularly the mental emotional
65:12
aspects what can you share
65:14
with us about what you've learned and
65:16
how bad it is in your professional
65:18
opinion
65:19
well i want to i'm not your ordinary
65:22
psychiatrist
65:24
i've spent a lot of time looking inside
65:26
the drug companies looking at the web
65:29
of organization around the world
65:33
and so i want to spend a few minutes
65:35
i'll divide up my time
65:37
and talk about the kind of material
65:40
that's in my
65:41
coronavirus website my coronavirus
65:45
resource center on my website
65:47
bregman.com
65:48
i've been involved with legal issues
65:50
around this virus i
65:52
i did a 120 page paper with hundreds of
65:55
references to
65:56
to start the ohio suit uh working with
66:00
wonderful uh uh tom rentz who's the
66:03
attorney doing that work so
66:05
i get called in like the ordinary
66:07
psychiatrist but there's a combination
66:09
here i also have a clinical practice
66:11
there's something missing from all the
66:13
analyses today and i've been uh
66:15
uh interested in it in a way it's
66:18
exciting because
66:19
what i spent all my time on in terms of
66:22
the causation here of where does this
66:25
start then start with cdc
66:27
it doesn't start with any of that
66:33
i be i first saw as uh
66:36
dr miller so clearly seen i'm sure
66:40
that uh all the early research a lot of
66:43
it
66:43
done in collaboration with china that's
66:46
the word we haven't heard
66:48
enough about today that we were actually
66:51
building viruses with china
66:55
so they were working in the wuhan land
66:58
we're working over here in north
66:59
carolina
67:01
and we're making deadly pathogenic
67:03
viruses with the chinese
67:05
we're funding them and you've heard some
67:08
of the sources of that
67:10
starting with fauci and um through
67:13
various other sources
67:16
and so i began to look at well why
67:19
why was nobody saying anything about
67:22
this we finally
67:23
went public on this blew the whistle on
67:25
it got the news up toward the trump
67:27
people
67:28
into the trump circle and he canceled
67:31
within two days of our coming out with
67:33
it
67:33
trump canceled the collaborations
67:36
between
67:37
fauci and china
67:40
he did not cancel the gain of function
67:42
research that we were still doing but he
67:44
saw the
67:45
china linkage immediately so we began
67:48
looking at all of the people who are
67:50
making money off of this
67:52
whether you look at a gates or a
67:54
bloomberg schwab
67:56
even the koch family if you look at the
67:58
top
67:59
16 billionaires
68:03
every one of them but one has deep
68:06
ties to china making a huge amount of
68:09
money in china
68:10
and is going to be participating in this
68:12
gigantic cover-up we've seen about the
68:14
origins of the virus
68:17
and because they're making so much money
68:20
from coveted 19
68:22
they don't want it to end they don't
68:24
want the cheap drugs coming in
68:27
they want the vaccine the vaccine the
68:29
vaccine they don't want even
68:30
they're not even that excited about
68:32
expensive drugs as much as expensive
68:34
vaccines
68:35
and the one thing they don't want is
68:37
cheap drugs
68:39
so who are all those other people if you
68:42
look at the
68:43
top companies that are shutting down
68:46
virus information
68:47
six companies twitter
68:50
facebook microsoft youtube google apple
68:54
they're all connected to china deeply
68:58
connected to china
69:00
they all are deeply connected to making
69:03
money off the virus
69:06
even the lancet is deeply involved
69:10
with who and and with china
69:14
protecting china they set up a
69:16
commission
69:17
to investigate china before who did and
69:20
they put the same
69:21
echo health guy on
69:26
that that who did um
69:29
so we've got the journals we've got the
69:34
agencies of all kind and they're deep
69:36
this all goes back to this connection
69:38
between the united states and china
69:41
and if you don't look into that if you
69:43
don't look how all these guys are
69:45
getting rich off china
69:47
anticipated the coming of the virus
69:51
that's been mentioned there's like four
69:53
or five six different ways they
69:55
they're out there saying we're going to
69:56
have a virus
69:58
in the years leading up to it they're
70:00
preparing to make a killing
70:02
on an epidemic
70:05
and they're also at the same time and i
70:08
can't exactly tell you why they're
70:10
all working with china so they're all
70:12
protecting china
70:14
and they're all dumping on the united
70:16
states of america
70:18
and since and this will be my last
70:20
sentence or two about this
70:22
america is a democratic republic
70:26
uh schwab one of these one of the big
70:29
thinkers in this whole area of the what
70:32
i call the globalist predators
70:33
has said in his newest book that a
70:36
democratic republic is incompatible with
70:38
globalism
70:40
but they find china to be very
70:42
compatible with globalism
70:46
so in the past year the last year of the
70:49
of the uh
70:50
2019 you have a a giant
70:53
conference everybody's there the
70:55
clintons are there i mean everybody's
70:57
there
70:58
and it's run by bloomberg and they hold
71:01
it in beijing
71:05
you've got to look at china because
71:08
otherwise you're spinning your wheels is
71:10
the this
71:11
huge collaboration but i'm calling the
71:13
global predators the corporations the
71:16
billionaires
71:17
they don't have any identification with
71:19
the united states
71:20
they don't care their identification is
71:22
power wealth self-aggrandizement
71:25
and they see it in china and china's
71:27
markets and china's power
71:29
so i wanted to add that this
71:31
conversation because i felt it would be
71:32
missing
71:34
now many of you yes go ahead go ahead i
71:37
have a few more minutes left
71:39
how much time do i have to talk about a
71:41
few few minutes is great
71:43
two or three yes uh many of you have
71:46
already spoken
71:47
as a psychiatrist and psychologists
71:49
about the terrible toll
71:52
i mean the the death rate among
71:54
adolescents from suicide is literally uh
71:56
way beyond that that they never get from
71:59
the cold environments they increase in
72:01
their suicides
72:02
um but i want to talk to you about an
72:05
underlying principle again
72:07
rather than all these different
72:08
diagnoses we have depression we've got
72:10
this going up we've got divorce going up
72:13
you know we have all this stuff the
72:15
thing that's being ignored
72:16
everywhere is that human beings are
72:19
social creatures
72:21
public health oddly enough does not take
72:24
it into account
72:26
the entire public health establishment
72:28
is not interested
72:30
in collateral damage to the social
72:34
fabric
72:34
of humanity and neither are incidentally
72:38
the global predators there's a lot in
72:40
common here that's happening in this
72:42
universe out there
72:45
in human beings we are so social that in
72:48
fact
72:49
everything we call mental illness is a
72:51
social phenome
72:54
it's either labeled socially or it
72:56
derives from
72:57
social suffering it doesn't come from
73:00
sitting by yourself it comes from
73:02
sitting by yourself when you want to be
73:03
with people
73:05
none of the diagnoses matter so what
73:07
we've done
73:08
by employing public health measures is
73:11
we've completely ignored
73:12
every form of social damage we shut down
73:16
the churches we shut down the schools we
73:18
live open the bars
73:21
so that people can be numb
73:25
human beings we are born unlike other
73:28
animals into entirely helpless state
73:31
we're born like fetuses literally quite
73:33
literally we can't walk
73:36
it's like you drag this out of a pouch
73:39
of
73:40
one of those bouncy creatures
73:43
from australia and then for a year we're
73:45
brought up our brain doubles in size
73:48
and it doubles in response to our social
73:51
life
73:52
so your brain is social
73:56
and we grow up needing social
73:59
relationships
74:00
social stimulation caring we need
74:03
love our deepest
74:07
the deepest i just published a paper
74:09
that was remarkably well appreciated on
74:11
what is the deepest common denominator
74:13
underneath all
74:15
basic kind of psychiatric psychological
74:17
suffering and it's a i believe it's a
74:19
belief that not worthy of love
74:22
which tales very well with the
74:23
judeo-christian tradition that
74:26
people don't feel worthy of love they
74:28
they need to feel
74:29
valuable and worthwhile and the public
74:32
health
74:33
people and fouchy and the absolute
74:37
disrespect of all the global predators
74:39
for humanity
74:41
has robbing humanity of its feeling that
74:43
it's worthwhile
74:44
serving of love deserving of meaning
74:48
deserving of caring
74:49
that's this huge destructive process and
74:52
it all goes back again
74:54
to the public health implementing what
74:57
the global predators want for us i want
75:00
to give you that big overview i hope
75:01
it's useful
75:02
it is thank you so much dr bregman it
75:04
does speak to the spiritual
75:06
crisis that many of us are facing due
75:08
again to the inappropriate
75:11
public health policies based on
75:13
distorted
75:14
if not absolutely false data thank you
75:17
uh commissioner um i'm actually it's
75:20
superintendent filming next
75:22
so you've been one of the few people
75:24
that have taken a stand on behalf of
75:26
our kids okay so what can you tell
75:29
parents watching about how you did it
75:31
and the positive impacts in person
75:33
education
75:34
has on every person including the
75:37
teachers
75:38
and if you have some stories to share
75:40
that you would like to
75:41
around this topic would be great
75:50
maybe a delay here do you hear me okay
75:52
mark
75:54
i don't think we can hear you right now
75:58
okay let's see mark can you hear us
76:03
okay let's um okay there you go hi mark
76:08
okay having trouble hearing you
76:12
um we might have a technical issue so um
76:16
i think jared will be addressing that
76:18
our sound support so i'll just
76:21
jump to commissioner um so
76:25
how what what response would you have to
76:28
what has been shared thus far
76:30
you know it's funny i always have to
76:31
start off with a comment about dr bregg
76:33
and he has no idea how much he's
76:35
influenced my
76:36
my uh my thinking i remember something
76:39
he said 30 years ago
76:40
and he said and this is from a
76:42
psychiatrist that mental illness is a
76:44
spiritual problem
76:46
and he was not saying it from any
76:47
particular religious discipline he was
76:50
saying that
76:50
just what he outlined is that there is a
76:53
need in all of us
76:54
to have that connection the social
76:56
connection the spiritual connection
76:58
and one of the first things we noticed
77:00
was done and i'm speaking about the
77:01
state
77:02
of oregon because every state is
77:03
different but but but uh pretty much the
77:05
macro
77:06
is that our churches were shut down our
77:09
schools were shut down
77:10
our restaurants were shut down our gyms
77:13
were shut down
77:14
these are the places where people find
77:16
connection you take that away
77:18
and you isolate them but our cannabis
77:20
shops were open our liquor stores were
77:22
open
77:22
and uh what was resumed was not was not
77:25
restaurant capacity now but was
77:27
was a video lottery so the way i look at
77:30
it is this we have to approach
77:31
each one of these and this is what we
77:33
did a number of resolutions
77:35
a number of lawsuits i testified in
77:37
federal court in portland
77:39
against the governor because of the
77:42
shutdown of the
77:43
of the of the the private schools and i
77:46
had heard a governor's spokesperson say
77:48
the reason we're doing this is because
77:50
if we open up the
77:52
private schools the faith-based schools
77:54
will see a mass exodus from the public
77:56
schools
77:57
so we use that in a case the case in
77:59
brooklyn
78:00
that allowed the churches to open
78:01
basically said any faith institution
78:03
including the faith-based schools
78:05
had to open and if we and based on that
78:08
the schools were
78:09
open and our our public schools are are
78:12
are still shut down because the teachers
78:14
unions are not interested in teaching
78:15
but what we do is we attack it from
78:18
resolutions
78:19
working with the trade organizations
78:22
like the restaurant associations
78:24
and we work on the local level we're
78:25
going we passed a resolution in december
78:27
which basically said we need accuracy
78:29
and coveted data
78:31
and we also are going to use this and as
78:33
a court validated process
78:35
whereby anybody who is shut down or
78:37
cited by a state
78:39
agency like uh oregon occupational
78:42
safety health association
78:44
will be able to use this in court as
78:46
cover
78:47
for uh being able to say hey listen
78:49
we've done everything we should do
78:51
we're not gonna be dinged for for the
78:53
covid uh citations
78:55
so we have another uh resolution that
78:57
i'm asking the board to pass
79:00
and that basically asks the governor to
79:02
uphold her pledge to support the
79:03
constitution
79:05
lifts orders restricting our local
79:07
businesses considers all our
79:09
independently owned businesses
79:10
as essential and we also ask that she
79:14
directs her state agencies like the
79:16
liquor control commission
79:18
and the oregon uh osha to uh
79:22
to cease her uh limiting their citations
79:25
to those infractions that were in place
79:27
before covid
79:28
so we're just basically going to
79:30
encourage our legislators to also
79:32
get active and start holding the
79:33
governor accountable for this overreach
79:35
from the executive branch
79:37
so you do what you can and you hit from
79:39
multiple perspectives
79:40
and that's what we do and our
79:42
constituents are grateful even though we
79:43
haven't been able to be effective
79:46
that's amazing thank you so much mary uh
79:49
mark are you uh
79:50
back online here okay yeah i had to have
79:53
a switch to sell i apologize for having
79:55
some internet trouble out here
79:56
rural america no problem
79:59
so go for it well a couple of things
80:02
uh you know when you see things like dr
80:05
breggin talking about some of the global
80:07
issues and who profits and who wins and
80:09
who loses
80:10
uh our story and i'll see is in a
80:12
microcosm we
80:13
we were ahead of the game as a small
80:16
school district
80:17
all our kids had devices and so we we
80:20
were
80:20
one of the first in oregon to switch to
80:22
the comprehensive distance learning
80:24
without even being told and then
80:25
um once we even though we did it very
80:28
well it
80:29
it was very clear that it was inadequate
80:32
so we made the decision to open
80:33
and every month the governor
80:37
kept changing the rules and she created
80:38
metrics that said nobody could open
80:41
and uh fortunately we reached out to our
80:43
legislators senator findley and senator
80:45
lipkum and others and uh they created
80:47
the royal exception
80:49
and we opened with all eyes on us on you
80:51
know we were the only full-time k-12
80:54
school open
80:55
we opened in august uh west of the
80:57
cascades for those who aren't familiar
80:58
with oregon
81:00
and uh we were able to show
81:03
through a whole bunch of mitigation and
81:05
safeguards that you could safely operate
81:07
schools
81:08
it is now february and we have still had
81:11
zero cases of code
81:13
that have been able to be in zero cases
81:16
period
81:16
uh no cases have been traced to uh being
81:19
sourced at the school
81:21
and yet most schools in oregon are still
81:23
closed
81:24
and uh just so everyone understands that
81:28
i finally said this to uh director colt
81:30
gill
81:31
just last week because uh ode is now
81:34
advising districts not to release
81:36
kids to
81:39
the school district either for our brick
81:40
and mortar for our online program
81:43
and i explained to him that's a
81:44
violation of rs338 we are not a virtual
81:47
charter school
81:48
and according to law kids cannot be
81:50
denied access to our programs and we're
81:52
in the middle of a pandemic
81:54
kids aren't being educated suicide rates
81:56
uh home stress
81:57
uh domestic violence i think we have uh
82:00
i think we need to keep the kids out
82:02
front
82:02
and i just kind of need melted face
82:06
like i want to serve kids even if we
82:07
don't get paid for them
82:09
things are really bad out there and i
82:11
got an email today saying well
82:13
you can go ahead and serve them but you
82:14
better not try to get paid for them and
82:16
this is from the director of education
82:18
and he is appointed by the governor
82:20
something is very very wrong i asked
82:22
director gill
82:24
why aren't we getting accolades in lc
82:28
why why aren't we being praised as a
82:30
school that could
82:32
uh for all the good that we've done on
82:34
the huge waiting list we have
82:35
the massive number of board members who
82:37
have come out to lc
82:39
so they could see what it looks like to
82:41
open a school during covets safely
82:44
i can go on and on but you know it goes
82:47
back to what
82:48
former speakers have talked about you
82:50
would
82:51
it's counterintuitive that we wouldn't
82:53
be held up as a
82:54
as an example of what can be done and so
82:58
i really want to encourage people
82:59
get connected and be active
83:02
um you know my claim to fame and
83:04
probably the reason i was asked to be on
83:06
this panel outside of
83:07
running a school was uh i i started
83:10
pushing back and commissioner starrett
83:12
knows i
83:12
i started getting active and i wrote a
83:15
letter
83:16
encouraging counties to open up because
83:20
we had so many kids trying to harm
83:22
themselves
83:23
the hospitalization rate visits in the
83:25
emergency room
83:26
for for students attempting suicide in
83:29
the and then
83:30
those those kids tying it back to
83:33
not being in school being isolated being
83:35
stuck at home
83:36
and i took it real personally so i
83:38
challenged the oregon health authority
83:41
uh epidemiologist and boy did i not know
83:44
what i was getting into
83:46
but i have a science background and uh i
83:49
i said look your data doesn't make sense
83:51
we've got as of october 20th we've got
83:54
um you know exponential number of cases
83:57
being identified
83:58
but hospitalization rates are going down
84:01
that's impossible
84:02
you cannot have a three-fold increase
84:05
in 10 days of covid identification cases
84:09
and expect to see hospitalization rates
84:11
going down well
84:12
what i didn't realize and what what came
84:14
out of it was the
84:16
um the hospitalization data comes from a
84:18
different source
84:20
and so the epidemiologist challenged me
84:22
about stochastic analysis and i said
84:25
well
84:25
great where is it i don't see it on your
84:27
website and then
84:29
then he just got quiet and he said why
84:31
are you doing this and i said listen
84:33
i'm being told i have to close my school
84:34
in january we're heading into the winter
84:36
break
84:38
i'm trying to determine whether or not
84:40
under these metric rules i can stay open
84:42
and i need good data to do that
84:44
and i don't have it so the the summation
84:47
of that is um
84:48
i told him i said look you you go back
84:51
to oha and report
84:53
that uh superintendent thielmann needs
84:56
to have a school open
84:58
and he needs safe what we call safe
84:59
harbor in oregon which means we can stay
85:01
open once we're open
85:03
and i said they've ended safe harbor
85:05
i've asked them to extend it and if they
85:06
extend safe harbor
85:08
i'll get real quiet real quick well
85:12
two hours later safe harbor was extended
85:14
through an email
85:15
from deputy superintendent colt gill
85:17
serendipitously
85:19
the next morning i'm driving to work and
85:21
there was an emergency oha radio
85:24
announcement
85:25
on the radio news am radio uh that they
85:28
think we're nearing the end of this
85:30
most recent covet spike as evidenced by
85:32
a reduction in hospitalization race
85:35
and that's when i realized something's
85:38
very
85:38
very wrong uh with
85:42
with that that's impossible you can't be
85:44
a superintendent call in and do that and
85:46
have it on the news the next day
85:48
if the data is scientific objectively
85:51
rationally
85:52
it's not so i'm i'm kind of upset
85:55
because
85:57
more kids your kids are suffering
85:59
education is not getting done
86:02
and we need to we need to really take a
86:04
long look in the mirror
86:05
our our political leaders and get back
86:07
to what we're supposed to be doing and
86:09
that is serving kids and families
86:11
being here to um as a as a state
86:14
and federal government serving the
86:16
people um
86:18
by which those governor governments
86:19
exist to to serve and not the other way
86:22
around
86:24
thank you so much for that for those
86:25
listening remember that this
86:27
data disaster has such profound
86:30
implications and here's a shining
86:32
example of a school that could
86:34
and your school where you live can as
86:37
well if we can only get this information
86:39
out and again the call
86:40
to action at the end of this broadcast
86:43
will enable you to be empowered to help
86:45
make that happen
86:46
um so dr bregen we're running a bit
86:49
behind but we'd love for you to
86:51
close this panel off with just telling
86:53
us how does this
86:54
make you feel to hear all of this and
86:56
what encouragement can you get
86:58
our viewers well the biggest
87:02
encouragement i want to give
87:03
has not been talked about again very
87:05
much so i want to point out
87:07
that we have a huge amount of
87:09
information on the early
87:11
treatment the prevention and early
87:13
treatment of covert 19.
87:15
so i want to give you some resources
87:18
real quick
87:19
um the association of american
87:22
physicians and surgeons
87:24
that's all you need to know you can even
87:26
go with aaps and google it
87:29
and they have a blue book right up there
87:32
in front
87:33
on the on the early treatment and
87:36
prevention
87:36
of covet 19 incredibly successful
87:40
uh it began with hydroxychloroquine
87:45
now there are other medications as well
87:47
they're all
87:48
cheap and the government doesn't want
87:50
cheap drugs going out to the folks so
87:53
you have to go to the to the people who
87:55
are really involved with that
87:57
and one of the doctors named mccullough
88:00
one is named solinko
88:02
um these are people you can find and
88:04
they're very
88:05
very important um
88:08
about the children i you know it's a
88:11
it's about treating all of us as was if
88:15
we're
88:15
objects in some you know consumer play i
88:19
mean the kids are consumers now they're
88:22
they're a market that's a better word
88:24
we've all been turned into a
88:26
market and the children is just awful
88:30
and now we're marketing vaccines to them
88:33
and we're going to do
88:34
that without any of the vaccines having
88:36
been tested on children i don't know if
88:38
anybody mentioned that before
88:40
vaccines have not been tested on
88:41
children but now we've gotten the okay
88:43
from the good old boys fda cdc whoever
88:46
found she was ever pulling the strings
88:48
and we're going to be
88:49
giving these kids mark you know these bp
88:52
wonderful kids
88:53
we should protect we'll be giving them
88:55
vaccines
88:56
i think that um we just have to get
88:59
another view of kids other than there
89:01
being a market for crappy videos and
89:04
violent movies and sex and uh
89:07
all the other uh stuff that i mean i
89:11
don't think i could grow up today i mean
89:13
a person is
89:14
full of you know stuff as i am i would
89:17
i would have been done in by just my own
89:18
over stimulation
89:21
with all the things our kids today have
89:23
to deal with
89:24
so our kids are in trouble and kovac 19
89:26
is just one more example of the way
89:29
we just use them to make money now
89:32
that's what the culture is doing it's a
89:34
partly the absence of religion i believe
89:36
it's partly the absence of
89:38
moral education our founders
89:41
said to have a democratic republic we
89:44
had to give
89:44
moral education to everybody to the
89:47
children especially everybody had to
89:49
read
89:49
and by moral education they also meant
89:51
the belief in freedom which we haven't
89:53
heard there may be enough about today
89:54
either
89:55
because they've taken away our freedom
89:57
and they were taking away the kids
89:59
freedom
90:00
they're turning us into a way to make
90:01
money this way and that
90:03
and it's um we got to look into that
90:06
very
90:06
big picture thank you so much dr bregman
90:10
exactly that's why we're doing this
90:12
event
90:12
and we are together providing a means
90:15
for
90:15
people to take back control of their
90:18
basic health rights and human
90:20
rights so again thank you panelists
90:22
we're gonna move on to
90:23
panel panel number four roundtable
90:25
number four uh including uh
90:27
anna gardner dr martin and senator
90:30
lynette
90:32
so we'll start with ms garner we've
90:35
known that you filed
90:37
impressive legal arguments in new mexico
90:39
ohio
90:40
and federally as well as suits against
90:43
the cdc
90:45
so many people are desperate to know
90:46
that something
90:48
and someone is bringing the legal
90:50
challenges
90:51
what can you tell us about the cases
90:53
you're currently working on
90:55
well the compromise data and the
90:59
misleading data is the thing that is
91:01
driving the suffering in
91:03
my state new mexico and that
91:06
that prompted me to start looking at
91:08
what the lawsuits what lawsuits were
91:10
happening around the u.s
91:11
and it wasn't until i saw tom renz's
91:14
lawsuit in ohio
91:15
which dr gregan mentioned working with
91:17
him and actually he
91:18
submitted a short affidavit in support
91:21
of the ohio lawsuit
91:23
and i started working with tom i called
91:24
tom and i said look i think you're on
91:26
the right track nobody else has figured
91:28
this out yet
91:29
except you and that is he knew that he
91:31
had to attack
91:32
the entire base of this
91:36
narrative which is there is no public
91:38
health emergency
91:39
and the way that we look at this is
91:42
we're looking at
91:43
all of the data that came in uh you know
91:45
how did this start
91:46
they're basing this public health
91:48
emergency on the fact that
91:50
there were modeling assumptions made by
91:52
the imperial college of london that were
91:54
just
91:54
absolutely so far off the mark that they
91:56
were ridiculous
91:58
but what did they do they instilled a
91:59
whole lot of fear in a whole lot of
92:00
people
92:01
millions of people are going to die
92:03
fauci said remember
92:04
so these that started the whole cascade
92:08
of false
92:09
information that was being fed to all of
92:12
the people who only get their
92:13
information from mainstream news
92:15
or perhaps the newspapers if that's the
92:17
only place they get their information
92:19
they're going to be horribly misinformed
92:21
so that's the beginning of it
92:23
then we have the cases and the
92:26
covet-related deaths
92:27
and dr ely covered that very very well
92:31
but the covet-related deaths in new
92:33
mexico we have a population of 2.1
92:35
million approximately
92:37
and we i just looked at um at the
92:40
numbers on the new mexico
92:41
public uh department of health and they
92:44
said that there are very close to 200
92:46
000 deaths in new mexico due to coven
92:50
that is not correct we've had a data
92:52
analyst actually get copies
92:54
of the death certificates and you can
92:56
tell just
92:57
from the death certificates that they're
92:59
miscoding them
93:01
so in his um analysis he figured that
93:05
only 15
93:06
of these deaths actually died with no
93:09
co-morbidities
93:10
or trauma so obviously
93:13
they're not they're not looking at these
93:16
things
93:16
correctly at all they know that they're
93:19
fake and they're scaring
93:21
everybody into just you know terrible
93:24
isolation fear and depression
93:26
we have we have uh fake numbers on cases
93:30
we have faith numbers on deaths
93:32
uh we these pcr tests nobody has really
93:35
come
93:36
out until this kind of uh event
93:39
come out and talked about how
93:42
meaningless and unreliable the pc
93:44
will you close your laptop
93:47
excuse me um so
93:51
uh anyway the pcr tests of course we
93:54
know have
93:55
a false positive rate of anywhere
93:58
from 70 to 90 depending on what sort of
94:01
cycle thresholds are used
94:03
depending on what reagents are used but
94:05
there's so many variables
94:06
and it appears that the pcr tests were
94:10
also
94:11
marketed under the emergency use
94:13
authorization which means they didn't
94:14
get tested
94:16
and they were done they were they were
94:18
created in the absence of a virus
94:21
being isolated that was claimed to have
94:23
caused
94:24
these uh this group of symptoms called
94:27
hogan
94:28
so we have we have you know meaningless
94:30
pcr test
94:32
we have the whole myth of asymptomatic
94:35
transmission
94:36
that was almost completely and
94:39
conclusively
94:40
rebuffed in the uh rebutted i should say
94:44
in the uh almost 10 million
94:47
person study done in wuhan there was
94:50
zero zero asymptomatic transmission
94:54
in this huge number of people so
94:58
that is not part of the uh
95:01
any bit of the truth that's driving this
95:04
public health emergency
95:05
and in fact that asymptomatic
95:08
transmission narrative
95:09
is driving a lot of very oppressive
95:12
measures
95:12
that are being done by the government
95:15
for example
95:16
mask wearing uh social distancing
95:19
isolation stay home stay home so that
95:22
everybody's safe
95:23
uh you they're quarantining healthy
95:25
people
95:26
they are claiming that healthy people
95:28
are now asymptomatic which implies that
95:30
we're all
95:31
walking germ vectors that's just not
95:34
true
95:35
you know i'm a healthy person pretty
95:37
much everybody i know is healthy in fact
95:39
i haven't known but
95:40
a couple of people who may have gotten
95:41
covered i haven't known anybody who's
95:43
died from
95:43
actually the disease i've known people
95:46
who got sicker from taking flu shots
95:48
so it's it's just it's been so overblown
95:53
that it's ridiculous so we're trying to
95:56
attack it tom and i
95:57
have been we've now filed three suits
95:59
together we're involved in three suits
96:01
and we are attacking it on the lack of a
96:05
public health emergency
96:07
if we and we fully expect to win this at
96:10
some level no matter where it's going to
96:11
be but we fully expect to win this
96:13
when that is one that there is no public
96:16
health emergency
96:18
all of the measures that have been
96:19
instituted fall by the wayside there's
96:22
absolutely no basis whatsoever then
96:24
to have any of these measures so
96:28
this is what we're claiming we did it in
96:30
the ohio suit
96:31
between the time that the ohio suit was
96:33
filed and the new mexico suit was filed
96:35
so much more information came out about
96:38
the unreliability of the pcr test
96:41
the fact that a portugal high appellate
96:44
court
96:44
found that the pcr tests were completely
96:46
useless at determining whether
96:49
traveling people coming into portugal
96:51
needed to be quarantined
96:53
based on the pcr test so they throw that
96:55
completely out in portugal
96:58
governor desantis in florida recently
97:00
said that all pcr tests
97:02
need to have the cycle threshold listed
97:05
because
97:06
that will decide if they're really
97:09
contagious or not because if you can
97:12
only find it
97:13
a positive result to a high cycle
97:15
threshold
97:16
then that means there is so little virus
97:20
that they could pop they could not even
97:21
possibly be contagious
97:23
a study in france
97:27
basically said that after 17 cycle
97:29
thresholds
97:30
the reliability of the test falls off
97:32
dramatically
97:33
and they don't recommend any above 30.
97:36
however all of the existing labs are
97:40
using
97:41
cycles and we found out in new mexico
97:43
they're using cycles of 40 and 45
97:46
how reliable can that be so obviously we
97:50
have to attack this
97:51
on everything we have and we say there's
97:53
no public emergency no public health
97:55
emergency because
97:56
the basis on which this was declared
98:00
they're all completely fraudulent in
98:04
faith
98:04
now we haven't claimed fraud in our case
98:07
in terms of the governor
98:08
committing fraud or somebody committing
98:10
fraud but we're saying the numbers
98:12
are fake the numbers are fraudulent so
98:15
that's that's the focus that we're doing
98:17
and you know uh dr ely talked about the
98:21
math and everything
98:22
that people couldn't do the math well
98:24
even the cdc admitted that 94
98:28
of all of the deaths that they had coded
98:30
being related to
98:31
covid had comorbidities and that
98:35
only six percent of them probably
98:37
actually had code
98:38
so how bad an emergency can it be when
98:41
we're talking about
98:43
survival bill survivability rates of 99
98:46
plus percent depending on your age group
98:49
and
98:50
the fact that most people have
98:53
they say they're either asymptomatic or
98:55
have very mild symptoms
98:57
well asymptomatic people are healthy
98:59
people they didn't have coping most
99:01
likely
99:02
because they never had symptoms so it's
99:04
not like we're all just
99:05
asymptomatic or positive or you know
99:08
it's we're healthy or
99:10
we're positive and the positivity needs
99:12
to be correlated with clinical symptoms
99:14
which they have not been
99:16
um that's you know they have not been
99:19
tested there's no gold standard for this
99:21
but where the the last suit we filed was
99:24
the cdc
99:25
suit that we filed which is to ask them
99:27
to stop
99:29
coding these deaths in fact i just
99:32
talked to someone this morning about
99:33
a gross violation of the whole coding
99:37
thing
99:38
gunshot wounds in a small county in
99:40
colorado
99:41
the coroner there asked the governor to
99:44
please take those off
99:45
a coven diagnosis or a coveted related
99:48
death
99:49
and the governor refused but these are
99:51
gunshot wounds
99:52
this is this is potentially a criminal
99:55
action of
99:56
murder or homicide or something else but
99:58
now it's being coded as clothing
100:00
what do you do in the legal system when
100:02
it they didn't really die or
100:04
gunshot wounds they died of coping
100:05
because they had a positive pcr test
100:07
it's absurd what do you do when somebody
100:10
is coded as covid
100:11
and they should be able their family
100:13
should be able to get an
100:14
accidental death uh insurance policy but
100:17
covet isn't an accidental death it's a
100:19
contagion it's usually excluded from
100:21
insurance claims there's so many
100:23
ramifications that can come from
100:25
coding the deaths incorrectly besides
100:28
the fear and hysteria
100:30
lockdowns mass social distancing we have
100:32
all sorts of problems that arise as a
100:35
result of that
100:36
the suffering that's happened in new
100:37
mexico has absolutely been
100:41
a level that i never thought i would see
100:43
come in
100:44
to the united states and that's what
100:46
prompted me
100:47
to get to come out of retirement
100:50
basically and
100:51
and start fighting these things and
100:53
we're seeking other attorneys who are
100:55
uh health and freedom liberty lovers as
100:58
we are because we know the next step
101:00
from this is mandatory vaccines and
101:02
that's another thing everyone
101:04
i'm going to call it the what dr ely
101:06
calls it the
101:07
uh experimental biologic uh
101:10
experimental biologic technology
101:14
something like that but at any rate we
101:16
know that that's the next battle that
101:17
we're going to have to fight here
101:18
because that is the natural consequence
101:20
of what we're doing and where
101:22
it's all going to see that so i really
101:25
appreciate the opportunity to be able to
101:27
tell people you know educate provide
101:29
something that i've learned about
101:31
and all of us have learned about and get
101:34
people to thinking about this that
101:36
what if this whole narrative is totally
101:38
false and totally incorrect
101:40
then what do we go back to living
101:43
normally i think so
101:44
you know that's my goal and i'm doing
101:47
everything in my power to
101:48
make that so in mexico because it will
101:50
have a far reaching effect
101:52
in other places so
101:55
wow on a that's an incredible summary of
101:58
all that you've learned and are doing on
102:00
behalf of us all thank you so much
102:03
so senator you've been involved in some
102:06
very interesting
102:07
cases concerning covid public health
102:09
policy
102:10
what do you think about what you've
102:11
heard and what do you think about
102:13
calling for a formal investigation
102:16
and what would you personally want to
102:18
see investigated
102:24
i think you're still muted senator
102:29
i think we'll get assistance with that
102:32
there we go hi senator
102:39
okay well first at the federal level
102:43
and for the cdc in particular the
102:45
information
102:46
quality act was meant to ensure that
102:48
policies were backed by valid scientific
102:51
and technical information
102:53
uh and there's a requirement
103:04
okay i'll start up again okay at the
103:06
federal level and for the cdc in
103:08
particular
103:09
the iqa the information quality act was
103:11
meant to ensure that policies were
103:13
backed by valid science and technical
103:16
information
103:16
along with the requirement that it be
103:19
rigorous
103:20
precise and useful for constructing
103:23
sound public policy
103:25
it also codified the public right to see
103:27
the source data the models and the
103:29
algorithms employed and the internal
103:32
and external standards for the review
103:34
process process
103:36
this is not optional this is an agency
103:40
obligation and it clearly has not been
103:43
been done uh say or you asked me what
103:46
would you like to see investigated and
103:48
quite frankly
103:48
everything needs to be reviewed not only
103:51
audit the data
103:52
but review the assessment processes the
103:55
determinant factors for policy
103:57
discussions
103:58
that weeded out relevant items in favor
104:01
of promoting
104:02
irrelevant data points this in
104:05
2020 hindsight all of this has happened
104:08
and we here are asking these questions
104:11
and the public deserves the answers the
104:14
hardest
104:15
uh area and maybe the most important
104:17
area would be
104:19
um to review the moral hazard that has
104:22
been
104:23
instigated and promoted by federal
104:26
healthcare funding models
104:27
and the counterproductive and and um
104:30
uh not only counterproductive but
104:34
moral hazard associated with covid19
104:38
incentives on death certificates for
104:40
example
104:41
what dr ely was describing here
104:44
in oregon actually across the u.s but
104:47
especially here in my state of oregon
104:49
states like new york and michigan
104:52
information is slowly surfacing that
104:55
shows the breadth of misinformation and
104:57
the severity of modeling errors
105:00
and these agencies quite frankly must be
105:02
held accountable the public has to
105:05
understand and recognize the soundness
105:08
of the quality
105:09
the objectives the utility the integrity
105:12
the scientific and technical even
105:14
statistical
105:15
information that the agencies are
105:18
adopting and disseminating
105:20
for public policy all of these appear
105:23
to be a one-sided
105:26
if you will top-down one-size-fits-all
105:30
approach and we the public
105:33
should know this by now and it's about
105:35
time we relearn this saying from lord
105:38
acton
105:39
power corrupts and absolute power
105:41
corrupts absolutely
105:43
and we are in the midst
105:46
of trying to figure out how do we
105:49
promote liberty
105:50
regardless of our race our gender our
105:52
political affiliate affiliation
105:55
how do we create a bridge to the future
105:57
that can unite
105:58
all of us in the common cause of
106:01
defending
106:02
our liberty to pursue our own medical
106:04
choices
106:05
without the nanny state stepping in and
106:08
forcing us to do one thing or the other
106:10
so we need to vigorously defend our
106:13
values by not being deceived by not
106:15
allowing us to be
106:16
fall prey to new definitions or
106:20
inaccurate assessments of the real facts
106:23
and more than anything we simply need to
106:25
stand and defend the truth
106:27
so all of it needs to be investigated
106:31
bring them tab to my office and i'll see
106:33
what we can do within our budget
106:36
wonderful thank you so much senator so
106:39
dr martin we have some questions for you
106:41
same questions actually what do you
106:42
think about what you've heard and is a
106:44
formal congressional
106:46
and or special grand jury investigation
106:48
warranted
106:49
what would you want to see investigated
106:51
well a couple things first of all
106:54
dr jack and i just so everybody knows
106:56
are actually not
106:57
at all on opposite pages or even
107:00
on at all conflicted with respect to the
107:03
rtpcr
107:04
the cdc patent on the rt pcr is largely
107:07
to blame for the fact that the
107:09
cdc chose to take a path that the rest
107:12
of the world didn't choose and that was
107:13
because they could force
107:15
others not into the market because of
107:17
their patent which gives rise to a very
107:19
fundamental
107:20
requirement for investigation under the
107:22
bi-doll act that was debated in 1979 and
107:25
passed in 1980
107:27
science in this country got hijacked by
107:30
industry
107:31
and this is regulatory capture this is
107:34
this is old school corruption this is
107:36
racketeering
107:38
this is antitrust violations this is
107:40
price fixing
107:42
remember that anthony fauci sits as the
107:44
purveyor of
107:45
an industry that was built on universal
107:49
in sequence hiv influenza
107:53
and now coronavirus vaccine promotion
107:56
his business 191 billion dollars of
107:59
public funds has been used and hijacked
108:02
191 billion dollars
108:05
under his leadership has passed through
108:08
his fingers
108:09
to achieve three failed objectives first
108:12
hiv vaccine
108:13
second pan influenza vaccine which he
108:16
said was going to be an
108:17
infant imprint vaccine and third
108:20
the coronavirus vaccine let's call it
108:22
what it is
108:24
this is racketeering this is antitrust
108:26
violations
108:27
and it's being perpetrated using
108:29
taxpayer dollars this
108:30
is in fact a criminal conspiracy and it
108:33
needs to be called what it is
108:35
and what dr jack is going to talk about
108:37
with rtbcr
108:38
i just want you to know i'm fully fully
108:41
endorsing what he's going to be
108:42
describing because
108:44
the issue is simple by filing patents on
108:48
the use of rtpcr
108:49
for coronavirus we do not have an
108:53
independent gold standard
108:54
anywhere not in the u.s or around the
108:57
world and the reason why we can debate
108:59
the application
109:00
of rtpcr is because cdc
109:03
under the bi-dole act was allowed to
109:06
preclude anyone from independent inquiry
109:10
into doing any form of diagnostics so
109:13
this is actually
109:14
something where going back to 2003
109:18
the ability to have independence has
109:20
been blocked
109:21
by the illegal and unethical use
109:25
of the bi-dole act from 1980 there has
109:27
to be an investigation into the
109:29
racketeering
109:30
there has to be an investigation into
109:32
the anti-trust violations
109:34
and this fundamentally brings criminal
109:37
not just civil complaints and that's the
109:40
important thing we need to show that
109:42
this is not an
109:43
oops i got it wrong this is a criminal
109:46
conspiracy it must be treated as such
109:49
and we must have leaders who have the
109:51
courage to get u.s attorneys and
109:53
district attorneys
109:54
and attorneys general in states to
109:57
actually bring
109:57
the appropriate legal action which is
110:00
not
110:00
civil it's criminal and we must
110:04
address this issue because this is a 191
110:08
billion dollar criminal crime syndicate
110:10
and in any other place we would actually
110:13
have
110:13
people cuffed and doing perk walks
110:16
and right now we're handing those people
110:19
awards
110:20
presidential medals of honor and it is
110:22
an absolute assault to everything that
110:24
we stand for in this country
110:26
so i'm i am all about congressional
110:29
investigations we have delivered the
110:31
fouchy dossier
110:32
by hand to every one of the senators in
110:35
the united states
110:37
taking a playbook from 1911 and 1912
110:41
we're calling for a peugeot commission
110:44
like investigation
110:45
which as you probably know historically
110:47
gave rise to the clayton act which is
110:49
the reform
110:50
of the antitrust acts in the united
110:51
states we are calling for exactly that
110:54
same thing now
110:55
which is a pujo commission for covid
110:58
that the congress takes on to bring
111:00
about
111:01
a investigation into an ultimate legal
111:04
reform
111:05
which ultimately will constrain the
111:08
abuses of the 9th and 10th amendment of
111:10
the constitution
111:11
and with that i could go on forever but
111:14
i appreciate having the opportunity i
111:16
look forward to hearing
111:17
the rest of this presentation but i
111:19
really want to see the ground to
111:21
people who are much smarter than me um
111:24
and and let's get the next panel on
111:26
thank you so much uh dr martin for that
111:29
so miss garner um
111:30
you have the floor for final thoughts
111:35
i do uh think that certainly filing
111:38
a criminal action is a very appropriate
111:41
thing because i think that this has been
111:42
a criminal enterprise
111:44
we felt that following the civil actions
111:46
and tom and i are both civil attorneys
111:47
we're not criminal attorneys and those
111:49
type of actions need to be brought by
111:51
attorney generals
111:52
or by district attorneys uh but in
111:55
filing the civil actions we feel that
111:57
we are taking the most direct path to
112:00
freeing up our liberties that have been
112:03
completely
112:04
taken away from us our liberties of
112:06
freedom to move around
112:07
freedom of association freedom to
112:09
worship freedom of expression
112:12
we have so many freedoms and liberties
112:15
that have absolutely been
112:16
shredded during this declared pandemic
112:21
and that is the time when our
112:23
constitutional rights
112:24
are the most precious and and
112:27
need to be upheld the most it's during
112:30
times of emergency
112:31
that was what our founding fathers
112:33
envisioned and that's what we're
112:34
going after these are constitutional law
112:36
cases that we're
112:38
presenting and that's why we're in
112:39
federal court but we are
112:41
we're doing everything we can to get
112:43
these types of
112:44
draconian measures reversed so that we
112:47
can
112:48
go back to living our lives normally and
112:50
save whatever businesses are still
112:53
able to hang on throughout these
112:56
considerable restrictions that have been
112:58
imposed on them so we're we're
113:00
really we want prayers uh we need
113:03
prayers
113:03
we feel that this is also a spiritual
113:05
battle in many ways
113:06
we ask for prayers and we ask for
113:08
support from people for what we're doing
113:10
here
113:11
so thank you thank you so much
113:14
panelists for this very powerful
113:17
round table so we'll be moving to our
113:19
final round table for the evening
113:22
we have dr jack dr ely superintendent
113:25
thielmann
113:25
dr bregen so we'll start with dr
113:28
jack this pcr test seems to be one of
113:31
the biggest problems with trusting the
113:33
data being reported by the cdc
113:36
what can you tell us about the problems
113:38
we've been hearing about the covid pcr
113:40
test
113:41
yeah at first i absolutely will i'm
113:42
going to give you guys some slide
113:44
presentation and detail that you'll
113:45
never forget
113:46
but first i want to address uh dr
113:50
martin's view
113:51
and my view on this you see if if
113:54
if society wakes up and says you know
113:57
based on dr henry hilly's paper
113:59
that there's a massive conspiracy theory
114:02
and
114:03
uh epidemiologists state epidemiologists
114:05
every public health official all across
114:07
the country
114:08
are all in bed with wuhan this is not
114:11
going to fly what we
114:12
have to do is we have to say dr david
114:15
martin's
114:15
dossier is a stunning indictment
114:18
on people who set this up and what i
114:21
meant
114:22
by disagreeing was on the very specific
114:25
motivation
114:26
specifically on why they won't budge
114:30
on the fact that we have a flawed pcr
114:32
test
114:33
they screwed up the tests they they
114:36
they stumbled all over themselves they
114:38
would have had the cat in the bag 100
114:40
if they didn't ship out that test they
114:42
wouldn't need
114:43
any uh commercial tests at all it was
114:46
anthony fauci in fact who said i guess
114:48
we're going to have to turn to the
114:49
commercial
114:50
test so if cdc flipped out a test they'd
114:53
have the license on it everybody have to
114:54
license to cdc and they'd be the richest
114:56
organization on the planet
114:58
so uh it's absolutely willful misconduct
115:01
at the highest
115:02
levels and i'm so i totally support dr
115:05
david martin
115:06
but i want to be because the way that
115:08
information propagates through social
115:09
networks and so on
115:11
it's very it's your head can be spinning
115:14
on how could there possibly be such a
115:16
massive conspiracy
115:17
the people in the middle they really
115:19
don't know what's going on they're being
115:20
they're good soldiers there's an
115:22
emergency you have to run the test this
115:24
way or it's going to get out of hand
115:26
and that and that's that's the
115:27
distinction it's a subtle distinction
115:28
but i'm going to cut right to uh
115:30
if i may cut right to the uh
115:34
the presentation that i have here
115:37
please uh thank you
115:42
okay so what i've done and this is ipac
115:45
research
115:46
uh independent research organization uh
115:48
when we talk about
115:50
deaths and diagnosis
115:53
and when when when the middle ground
115:56
epidemiologists say that there's no
115:57
false positives
115:58
there's such a wide different number of
116:01
uh
116:02
definitions of types of false positives
116:04
you can have the false positive of the
116:06
test
116:06
you can have a false positive of the
116:08
test in the lab with
116:10
with artificial sequences you can have
116:12
the false positive of the test
116:14
in the field on real patient data and
116:17
you can have a theoretical estimate of
116:19
the false positive just by doing blast
116:21
which is what fda asks for
116:23
what i'm going to do is i'm going to
116:24
show you every factor that has to be
116:26
considered to understand the accuracy
116:28
of the assessment uh the ascertainment
116:30
of death so this is about the diagnosis
116:33
in the situation where there's a death
116:35
involved uh it also is
116:37
directly applicable i was on top of this
116:39
way back in
116:40
april and you can go watch the
116:42
unbreaking science episode cdc's deadly
116:45
testing fiasco
116:46
and uh you'll find there that chris
116:48
meekins is a
116:50
whistleblower that came out and said
116:51
that uh cdc actually lied to the
116:53
president of the united states
116:55
uh over readiness of tests they were
116:57
stumbling all over themselves
116:59
but here we have the this is going to be
117:01
a big decision tree
117:03
we have somebody who's died they have a
117:05
coven 19 test before
117:07
or after their passing the test is
117:10
positive
117:11
or they were tested and it was positive
117:14
uh
117:14
this implies that the virus is present
117:16
but that actually in this
117:18
situation it means yes in this
117:20
particular patient
117:21
the virus was in fact present in this
117:24
particular patient the virus was in fact
117:26
viable and in this particular case
117:30
the virus caused the death uh we know
117:33
from
117:35
other published research this is not my
117:37
research but other published research
117:38
that
117:39
the ct value itself uh if you set the ct
117:42
threshold too high you're going to end
117:44
up with false positives
117:46
and non-transmissibility you're going to
117:49
end up with
117:50
deaths that are not attributed that are
117:52
attributed as causal but they're not
117:54
causal because even though it tested
117:55
positive
117:56
the person didn't die from it because
117:58
the virus wasn't even viable
118:00
and the world health organizations
118:02
recognized that the pcr
118:04
ct scores have to come down this is
118:06
their notice uh this is the sentinel
118:09
article showing that kansas actually did
118:12
the same thing
118:13
they they're bringing their ct scores
118:15
down and i expect state after state
118:17
is going to start dialing back their cts
118:20
so in this decision tree if this if the
118:23
virus was present
118:24
and the virus is viable it still could
118:26
be unrelated such as in the
118:28
situation of a person that has
118:29
government 19 who is killed by a shotgun
118:31
blast
118:32
so that death should not be attributed
118:34
we just heard about that that was a
118:36
brilliant uh
118:37
point but we also have in that case
118:40
would be a false positive
118:41
so in in in the very first category we
118:44
have the true positives
118:45
and then in the second category we have
118:47
a false positive because the virus was
118:49
not
118:50
was was viable but unrelated and then we
118:52
have the virus was
118:54
uh present but not viable that's another
118:56
category of false positives
118:58
and then we also have the fact that the
119:00
test might have a false positive rate
119:02
itself this is the clinical test false
119:05
positive the technical false positive
119:07
rate that we're talking about
119:08
everybody else talking about false
119:10
positives hasn't even addressed the
119:11
other two categories of false positives
119:13
so with the virus actually being absent
119:15
with the test
119:16
uh scoring positive that's those are the
119:19
rates that are published by basil
119:21
and lee and wernicke uh and and they're
119:25
a stunning indictment on the use of pcr
119:28
just to detect the virus let alone to do
119:30
the
119:30
clinical diagnosis and the the mortuary
119:34
uh
119:35
analysis so um here we have an example
119:39
where
119:39
yeah the person's tested but the test
119:42
was negative
119:43
and then um then we have of course the
119:45
possibility well
119:47
the virus isn't there but there's
119:48
consequences there uh
119:50
another category that joins that test
119:52
negative
119:53
are people that aren't tested at all
119:55
there are people that
119:57
die they're given a carbon-19 test uh no
120:00
they're they're not given a covenant 19
120:01
tests we're going to call those test
120:02
negatives as well
120:04
and then this is where the presumed
120:06
positives come in
120:07
this is where dr ely was referencing
120:09
earlier that the test is assumed
120:12
to uh regardless of the test result if
120:14
they're not tested
120:15
you can go ahead and assume any
120:17
respiratory illness is covered 19 with
120:19
the financial perverse incentive
120:22
that is going to turn out to be
120:25
something where it's complex because in
120:27
fact it could be
120:28
a true positive uh because they weren't
120:30
tested we don't know the virus could be
120:32
present
120:32
so we're going to put that back to this
120:34
category where the virus is present and
120:36
it can either become a true positive or
120:38
still two categories of false positives
120:40
here we have the presumed c uh
120:43
coronavirus
120:45
uh fatality but the virus is actually
120:47
absent and that's going to be a false
120:49
positive
120:50
uh and that also plays into um
120:53
enhancing these false positive rates
120:56
because these are again are just the
120:58
clinical uh the technical false
121:00
positives of the test
121:02
now if you have a negative test uh
121:05
either because you weren't tested or the
121:08
test turned back negative
121:10
if you don't presume if you overrule the
121:12
prescription
121:14
uh the mandate to presume all deaths due
121:17
to coven 19
121:19
if an otherwise specified if you have
121:22
another reason like dr scott jensen
121:23
estimates 25
121:25
of of his cases that he's looked at who
121:28
that died should not be
121:30
considered cavite 19 at all
121:34
then the virus could still be present
121:36
you could be wrong
121:37
and then it then come becomes the
121:39
question whether or not it was a causal
121:40
factor
121:41
uh or not and then the other category is
121:44
the virus is present but
121:46
but it was unrelated anyway and then of
121:48
course if it's not presumed and the
121:50
virus is true
121:51
truly absolutely have the true negatives
121:52
what i've done here is fleshed out the
121:54
entire tree
121:56
of possible combinations and you can see
121:58
there's the true positive
121:59
there's one route to two positives here
122:02
uh a circuitous route through
122:04
the presumption pathway there's uh i
122:06
count uh
122:07
four different categories of false
122:10
positives
122:10
uh of a false negative uh and then
122:14
uh two categories of of true negative
122:17
what this represents is an
122:20
irreconcilable number of ways to get
122:22
this wrong with cdc's algorithm
122:24
cdc's algorithm should absolutely have
122:28
invited public comment
122:29
so people like me and the hundreds or
122:32
thousands of other people in the country
122:34
that are involved in clinical
122:35
diagnostics have developed clinical
122:37
diagnostics and biomarkers
122:39
could point this very scenario out to
122:42
the cdc
122:43
way back in march and ask them what are
122:45
you thinking
122:46
this is madness look at what's going to
122:49
happen to you
122:50
you have to make sure that you have zero
122:52
false positives
122:53
and you can't just claim that you have
122:55
zero false positives
122:56
because the prevalence is low this is
122:59
the reference i wanted to say about we
123:01
need to basically replace the cdc
123:03
plan b public health infrastructure and
123:05
operations oversight reform for america
123:08
the cdc is not in any way we heard it
123:11
tonight
123:12
interested in any other cause of
123:15
morbidity or mortality in the united
123:17
states other than pathogenic illness
123:19
that they might be able to
123:21
uh prevent the diagnosis of with a
123:23
vaccine
123:24
this is a massive massive mistake
123:28
on the part of the united states of
123:30
america so i'm asking my ask
123:32
is that every american citizen contact
123:34
their congressman and their senator
123:36
and say that take a look at this send
123:37
them this paper it's freely available
123:39
online it's peer-reviewed
123:41
send it to your representatives and say
123:43
we really need
123:44
to find out what the major causes of
123:46
morbidity and mortality are in the
123:48
united states and how do we reform
123:50
the way we conduct ourselves in the
123:52
united states of america
123:53
that take all of those concerns into
123:55
play
123:56
i'm not going to go into details but
123:58
basically what we end up with is a
124:01
a neural network arrangement of
124:04
entities scattered across the country
124:06
that can't do anything but learn
124:08
but the most important point here is
124:10
that at the end
124:12
this is de-politicized it is uh
124:16
distributed all across the country in a
124:18
way that
124:19
that is um decentralized
124:22
and the president of the united states
124:24
and the vice president united states
124:26
whose president pro tempore of the house
124:29
is informed on what the policies are so
124:32
it can never become
124:34
public health your public health your
124:37
wellness
124:37
your medical wellness can never again
124:40
become a political commodity it is
124:43
already a financial commodity
124:45
but look into plan b that's absolute
124:48
essential reform in the united states
124:50
and our goal to help out here
124:53
dr ely's on it now we were not
124:55
collaborating before
124:57
the publication we are now on a
124:59
committee
125:00
uh that is overseeing this particular uh
125:03
nucleic acid
125:05
technology technology evaluation
125:07
consortium we're going to outfit dr
125:08
singh hang lee
125:10
with a workflow access to clinical
125:12
resources
125:14
throughout new england access uh to the
125:16
resources he needs
125:18
to actually sequence more of the
125:20
clinical samples there's not enough
125:21
sequencing done in the united states and
125:23
everyone knows it
125:24
uh to do sequencing by his method which
125:27
he assures us will
125:28
actually tell us what's present in the
125:30
sample and not just tell us
125:32
it's covered 19 or not it will also tell
125:35
us
125:36
based on my prompting to include primers
125:40
for other pathogens so we can see if
125:42
it's
125:43
influenza a b oh and others as well
125:45
dolores cahill
125:46
also it prompted this um
125:49
there are many people on the consortium
125:51
it's at the ipac website
125:53
uh we our initial goal is 133 000 to
125:56
just fund dr lee the overall consortium
125:58
is the goal is 300 000 so we can outfit
126:01
him
126:02
uh with a next generation sequencer so
126:04
we can do the whole genome sequencing of
126:05
pathogens as well
126:07
uh and so you can find the nucleic acid
126:10
testing evaluation consortium at the
126:12
ipac website
126:13
this is the the pictures of the people
126:15
who've joined up joined on the
126:16
consortium
126:17
we're a pretty close-knit group i'm all
126:20
business about science
126:22
uh and uh you know hope to help to hope
126:24
to make these things
126:25
a reality and we need your help well dr
126:29
jack thank you and i commend you for
126:30
diving so deeply into
126:32
the most granular of levels with the
126:35
data disaster we're
126:37
revealing today as well as providing a
126:40
solution now
126:41
so that's what's so encouraging about
126:43
your work
126:44
and of course this event is we're going
126:46
to empower you
126:48
listeners with a way to contact your
126:50
elected officials
126:51
and disseminate this information very
126:54
easily
126:54
so stay with us the call to action is
126:57
coming soon
126:58
so dr ely you've done a lot of working
127:01
helping
127:02
people understand this asymptomatic
127:04
transmission right
127:06
and in your upcoming paper i think it's
127:08
going to be also highlighted
127:10
uh what we'd love to hear from you is a
127:12
little bit more about that
127:13
concept as well as safe and effective
127:16
treatments that
127:17
are available but they're getting almost
127:19
no uh
127:20
mainstream coverage well uh sayer thank
127:24
you
127:25
so much uh for that and i what i
127:28
what i want to say first and foremost is
127:30
uh i'm very passionate
127:32
and um i'm also very optimistic and i
127:35
believe that there are good people
127:37
in these institutions i i believe that
127:39
there are good people at the county
127:41
level at the state level
127:42
i've been very fortunate to talk with uh
127:45
the head
127:45
epidemiologist on an expert forum just
127:48
last week
127:49
about nutrition and he agreed with me
127:52
that nutrition
127:53
that people who get the nutrition we're
127:55
about to talk about
127:56
have much better outcomes and that we
127:58
have to do a better job of getting that
128:00
information
128:01
to the people and and so i'm openly
128:05
pressing to collaborate with him and our
128:07
intention
128:08
is always to collaborate with the good
128:10
people who don't have an agenda don't
128:13
have
128:13
a financial motive or a or a conflict of
128:16
interest and so forth
128:18
uh so to that end i really commend what
128:20
dr martin
128:21
is saying because it's so passionate
128:23
what dr jack is saying because it's so
128:25
com it's so just passionate and i think
128:28
what
128:28
what dr jack just said that as a doctor
128:31
it makes me go this is exactly why we do
128:33
say our confirmatory lab testing
128:36
we don't rely just on one test as as the
128:39
key and only diagnostic we rely on viral
128:42
load testing we rely on antibody testing
128:45
we take
128:45
a sample and we put it in a live cell
128:48
culture and see if it can
128:49
infect the cell and and therefore prove
128:52
infect
128:53
infectivity in the person but in
128:56
medicine we don't rely on one test
128:58
ever we always have confirmatory tests
129:01
and that's what helps us get to what's
129:02
so important
129:03
say or what's called the definitive
129:04
diagnosis now as it pertains to
129:07
nutrient deficiencies the cdc has known
129:10
via their inhane studies for over 20
129:12
years
129:13
that 35 to 45 percent of americans are
129:16
deficient in vitamin a
129:17
uh 37 to 46 percent of americans are
129:20
deficient in vitamin c
129:21
uh 65 to 95 percent of americans are
129:24
deficient in vitamin d
129:26
uh 60 to 84 percent of americans are
129:29
deficient in vitamin e
129:30
and 11 to 15 percent of americans are
129:32
deficient in zinc
129:34
it's not a coincidence that each of
129:35
these nutrients i just mentioned
129:37
are key biochemical players in
129:41
a well-nourished and effective immune
129:44
system
129:44
you need to have these nutrients in
129:46
order for your immune system
129:48
to do its job so that if even one of
129:50
these is missing
129:52
then you run the risk of an immune
129:54
system that is not able to correctly
129:56
deal with
129:57
infections including sars cove too we've
130:00
cold the research there my team is just
130:03
crushed it on this level
130:05
finding hundreds of evidence-based
130:07
clinical trials specifically for covid
130:10
i'm going to read just a couple of them
130:11
to your to your viewers
130:13
vitamin a vitamin c vitamin d and iodine
130:16
were administered to 107
130:18
moderate to severe covid patients all of
130:22
them fully recovered within
130:23
seven days of treatment and this was
130:25
actually published on dr
130:27
jack's independent peer-reviewed journal
130:29
ipac
130:30
a chinese hospital in the epicenter in
130:33
wuhan took on
130:34
50 cases of moderate to severe covet 19
130:38
and used iv vitamin c and
130:41
what they found was that not only did uh
130:44
was there no morbidity
130:46
that but that the stay in the hospital
130:48
was on
130:49
average three to five days shorter than
130:51
the people who didn't use
130:52
intravenous uh vitamin c therapy there
130:55
was
130:56
no mortality in the ivaa group
130:59
there were no side effects from the ivaa
131:01
group and there was
131:02
a successful 100 management of cytokine
131:06
storms
131:06
huge vitamin d3 in another study
131:09
significantly
131:10
reduced icu admission rates as well as
131:13
reduced the severity of covet 19 disease
131:16
of the 50 total patients who received
131:18
vitamin d3 only one
131:20
was admitted to the icu that makes up
131:22
two percent of their study
131:24
of the 26 patients who were not
131:26
administered vitamin d3
131:28
13 were admitted to the icu of the 50
131:31
patients
131:31
treated with vitamin d3 zero deaths
131:34
occurred and all 50 patients were
131:36
eventually discard discharged
131:38
without complications just a couple more
131:40
vitamin d deficiency was associated
131:42
with increased hospitalizations and
131:45
increased
131:45
mortality severe cases of covet 19
131:48
were 64 more likely to be vitamin d
131:52
deficient than mild cases of covid19
131:55
their conclusion sayer
131:56
vitamin d deficiency is associated with
131:59
higher infection rates
132:00
increased instances of sepsis and
132:02
increased mortality risk among
132:04
critically ill populations last one for
132:07
you sayer on the on the studies
132:08
a total of 191 779
132:13
patients were included in this study uh
132:16
median age was 54 years
132:18
60 percent of this of the enrolled
132:19
participants were female
132:21
the sars cove two positivity rate was
132:24
higher in
132:25
the 39 190 patients with deficient
132:29
levels of vitamin d that's under 20
132:31
nanograms per milliliter
132:33
then the 27 870 patients with adequate
132:37
and adequate was just
132:38
considered 34 to 30 to 34 nanograms
132:41
there
132:42
from a naturopathic doctor standpoint
132:44
that's still deficient
132:45
okay but when we get to over 50
132:48
nanograms per
132:49
liter of vitamin d when they do a blood
132:51
sample
132:52
only 5.9 of the people
132:55
who had that high level of vitamin d
132:58
circulate in their bloodstream
133:00
even contracted it now here's their
133:01
conclusions there sars cove to
133:04
positivity is
133:05
strongly and inversely associated with
133:07
circulating vitamin d
133:09
in the bloodstream a relationship that
133:11
persists across all latitudes
133:13
all races all ethnicities both sections
133:16
and age ranges what did i say earlier
133:18
this is
133:19
the sars cove two doesn't care what the
133:21
color of your skin
133:22
is it cares about your nutrient status
133:26
all right our fight there's their final
133:29
statement on this our findings provide
133:30
impetus to explore the role of vitamin d
133:33
supplementation
133:34
in reducing the risk of sars cove to
133:36
infection and covid
133:38
19 disease now what i want to say to
133:41
that sayer is my
133:42
team has authored now a definitive
133:45
guideline based upon evidence based
133:49
research surreal science into
133:51
determining
133:52
what amount our seniors adults
133:55
teens our school age kids and even all
133:58
the way down to one year of age
134:00
need to have on a daily basis to protect
134:04
themselves so that we could have a safe
134:05
return to in-person education
134:07
a responsible reopening of small of
134:10
small businesses and
134:12
a a getting back on with our lives
134:14
because
134:15
i don't know about you sir but for me
134:18
americans don't let americans die alone
134:20
but that's been happening americans
134:22
don't let american children
134:24
suffer alone but that's been happening
134:27
americans
134:28
at our core we are good we are
134:31
good people and what's going on right
134:34
now
134:34
is not good so to that end say i'll
134:38
answer your final question about the
134:39
asymptomatic transmission and build off
134:41
of what
134:42
ms garner had said earlier about the
134:44
wuhan study
134:45
there was one study done about
134:47
asymptomatic transmission this is going
134:49
to blow your mind if you're watching
134:50
this at home it's going to blow it blew
134:52
my mind it was published in november in
134:53
nature journal
134:55
the wuhan participant study had 9
134:58
million
134:58
898 828 enrolled participants almost 10
135:02
million participants that they tested
135:04
using
135:05
the pcr only 300 possible asymptomatic
135:09
carrier candidates were
135:10
identified so then they took those 300
135:12
they said let's
135:14
put there let's get confirmatory lab
135:16
tested they're doing what
135:17
should happen of the 300 possible
135:20
asymptomatic carriers
135:22
all were tested using live cell culture
135:24
to determine if their pcr samples
135:26
could produce replication competent
135:28
virus a phrase you've heard dr fauci say
135:30
repeatedly
135:32
all 300 of those people that they
135:35
thought were asymptomatic carriers
135:38
could not one of them could produce a
135:40
lifestyle culture meaning that
135:42
none of them were infectious so what
135:44
that told us
135:45
was that out of the 9 million 898
135:48
828 people tested in the largest study
135:52
ever conducted in a single year with
135:53
enrolled participants
135:55
there was a 0.000
135:59
chance of asymptomatic transmission it
136:02
has to this day
136:03
never been proven our fifth paper proves
136:06
that
136:06
and all of these studies that you see
136:08
coming out funded by the nih funded by
136:11
the cdc
136:12
that are published in jama they are
136:14
nothing more than projection model
136:16
studies with
136:16
zero enrolled participants they are in
136:19
essence
136:20
scientific fraud and it's something that
136:24
is absolutely disgusting and that we
136:25
have to denounce as a culture
136:27
so that we can get to the heart of the
136:29
matter and get on with ending the
136:31
suffering
136:32
that our brothers and sisters are going
136:34
through right now i
136:35
can not abide by the amount of suffering
136:38
that the people that we love so much are
136:41
enduring it's
136:42
been too long it's enough let's get on
136:44
with it
136:46
that is so beautiful and so resonant and
136:49
i yeah i just i really appreciate that
136:52
you communicated that to everyone
136:53
listening
136:54
it's super helpful uh so super
136:57
uh intended theo theomen given what
136:59
you've just heard what's going on
137:01
through your mind right now
137:02
and what are the implications of what
137:04
you heard for in-person education
137:07
and athletics for our children
137:10
well yeah um there's just been a
137:13
tremendous amount of information
137:14
and a lot of it mirrors what we've
137:17
experienced here
137:19
being open as a school uh the narrative
137:21
that that
137:22
we've been told didn't and the data that
137:24
was being posted
137:27
didn't relate to the experience we were
137:29
having in real life and uh
137:31
you know i'm a school superintendent so
137:33
i kind of give the qualitative side not
137:35
not so much the quantitative side of
137:37
this but i really want to emphasize
137:40
and i think it was dr bregan also said
137:42
this and uh you know dr ely talking
137:44
about just simple vitamins
137:45
and nutrients um i mean these are
137:48
no-brainer things that
137:49
that we ought to be doing and i just
137:51
really want to
137:52
highlight the why so you know dr reagan
137:55
talked about
137:56
children need connection and love
137:59
children need to be in school
138:01
and i live about 65 miles away from the
138:04
place i work and i was talking to a
138:07
mother
138:08
after church she was in tears because
138:10
her son wanted to drop out of high
138:12
school and i said well hey
138:13
i'll let me talk to your kid and i'll
138:15
see if
138:16
he he would be interested in coming out
138:18
to lc because i'm driving there anyway
138:20
and i'll just pick him up in the morning
138:22
on each school day so sure enough i went
138:25
and
138:25
marketed the the and the young man said
138:28
yeah
138:29
you know what okay i'm gonna come to
138:31
this little tiny school
138:33
and within six weeks you know he's a new
138:35
kid and totally bought in
138:38
every day he's waiting at six o'clock in
138:40
the morning
138:41
never been late always on the forge
138:44
absolutely engaged in school because
138:46
he had been out of school so long how
138:49
long and short of it is sometimes we
138:50
have late nights because i have late
138:52
night board meetings
138:53
once a month and uh my daughter also
138:55
comes to school here and so where
138:57
it's usually a crowded car uh we got out
139:00
about 10 30 and my daughter fell asleep
139:03
and this young man fell asleep and then
139:05
we all of a sudden he woke up and
139:07
he was talkative and he he started
139:09
telling me
139:10
and it's hard to talk about because this
139:12
is the real human side
139:14
he started talking to me about how he
139:17
was finally on
139:19
ending ending his you know doing harm to
139:21
himself
139:22
attempting on his life and then this guy
139:25
showed up and said hey come to school
139:27
and then he just thought well why not
139:30
and
139:30
he said i and and he talked about how
139:34
his entire life has changed because he's
139:36
been able to come to school in person
139:39
and that he's got a superintendent that
139:41
picks him up
139:42
and of course i'm listening to this and
139:44
what do you say other than listen
139:46
and he said uh and i cannot wait i've
139:49
never played
139:50
a sport in my life and everyone wants me
139:53
to play football
139:54
well this young man is a very very big
139:56
big kid
139:57
and in a small school he stands out
140:01
and he's popular and he has friends and
140:04
um i'll tell you i didn't sleep that
140:06
night because
140:08
um we have a governor who up until very
140:10
very recently and only under tremendous
140:12
amounts of pressure
140:14
largely produced by people like myself
140:17
said no to sports and uh
140:20
you know i just finally you know threw
140:23
down with
140:23
with our with our decision makers they
140:26
can have football or funerals
140:28
to date in oregon the state of oregon
140:31
kids zero to 19 years old
140:34
we have lost zero kids age zero to 19
140:38
to covet but all of the schools are
140:41
closed
140:41
at least the vast majority kids have
140:44
been isolated
140:45
and they're doing harm to themselves and
140:47
it's not just the ones that end their
140:49
lives it's the ones that cut
140:51
it's the ones that are are succumbed to
140:53
anxiety and depression
140:54
who withdraw who get engaged in things
140:58
that are okay because they're on the
140:59
computer all day
141:01
these are the qualitative aspects of
141:04
some of the other things that some of
141:05
the other speakers have done a better
141:06
job of quantizing you know quantizing
141:09
and that's what i want to leave the
141:11
audience with
141:12
why should we push forward and
141:14
investigate this
141:17
that's why we're talking about the next
141:20
generation of kids that we have
141:22
we are failing and we will continue to
141:24
fail if we don't bring this out into the
141:27
light
141:28
and we don't make a course correction
141:30
very very
141:31
quickly thank you so much for that
141:36
so dr bregen uh you're our final
141:38
panelist
141:39
for this uh round table you know at the
141:42
risk of
141:43
asking an obvious question why is it so
141:45
important for a children to be back in
141:47
school
141:48
immediately and without undue
141:50
restriction and what can we expect
141:52
throughout society if this questionable
141:54
emergency continues on for much longer
141:59
um well i'd like to make a few summary
142:02
remarks since i'm the last person as
142:04
well
142:05
briefly and i want to start out by
142:07
thanking stand for health freedom
142:09
i mean this is amazing what you've done
142:13
and um it's just marvelous
142:17
and um
142:20
uh we we haven't seen uh leah wilson
142:23
here
142:24
on the film anywhere so i want to just
142:26
give her a shout out and say
142:27
thanks for having me here along with all
142:29
these other distinguished guests
142:32
um i would like to
142:36
um well about our children we
142:39
we're probably setting them way back
142:43
it's a good potential catastrophe we're
142:46
teaching them to be afraid of each other
142:48
we're teaching them to be afraid of
142:49
their government we're teaching them
142:52
that
142:52
nobody cares enough about them to risk
142:54
getting covert 19
142:56
to teach them um we're giving them
142:59
bringing them up in a paranoid world
143:02
we're going to make them more scared um
143:06
none of this is taken into account by
143:08
the public health people zero
143:10
you just don't find any discussions i
143:12
haven't in public health literature
143:14
certainly in the medical literature i
143:16
haven't found any i'm a physician i
143:17
haven't found any
143:20
so we need to open the schools up
143:25
we don't have a medical crisis we have
143:29
a politically induced with the excuse of
143:33
covet 19
143:36
social crisis and political crisis
143:40
one of the things that has not been
143:42
mentioned enough i think
143:43
is that america is in a state of
143:45
political crisis
143:47
we have been cowed our children had been
143:51
towned
143:53
i was reading a article by a
143:56
letter by a fellow physician
143:59
and she was describing sitting in her
144:01
office and seeing a line of
144:03
five years old four years old three
144:05
years old that would have ordinarily
144:07
been holding hands
144:10
and they had their hands behind their
144:12
backs
144:14
and their heads were bent and then masks
144:17
on their faces
144:19
and they weren't relating to anybody
144:22
and then it brought to her mind and mine
144:25
images
144:26
of the gulag this is what we're
144:29
preparing our children for we are
144:30
preparing them
144:32
not to be citizens of a robust
144:35
democratic republic
144:37
but to be citizens of global predators
144:40
uh
144:42
bizarre kind of global governance that's
144:44
going on right now outside the hands
144:46
even of
144:47
the governments so
144:50
that would that's enough to say about
144:52
the kids
144:53
i want to say that um
144:57
we need all the approaches we can have
144:59
to looking at this
145:02
um i'm
145:06
i'm not concerned about somebody saying
145:09
i'm
145:09
giving a conspiracy theory i'm not
145:12
interested anymore in people and
145:14
they're saying that we need to take
145:17
overview look at what next going on
145:20
and then we need to take the scientific
145:22
look
145:23
i mean i started out being given this
145:25
giant
145:26
task that i guess what most people are
145:29
seeing is my little affidavit but you
145:31
know
145:32
like this paper for the legal case and
145:35
it started out with
145:36
oh yeah that the effects on the children
145:39
and then i looked at
145:40
fauci we've talked about voucher i've
145:42
been studying pouching
145:44
but fauci leads to china
145:47
directly to china and we
145:51
need to be able to listen to that
145:53
because america is in
145:55
a war with another country we haven't
145:59
declared it they declared it decades ago
146:03
they have a policy of undermining
146:06
america
146:08
getting their scientists into all of our
146:10
laboratories into all of our schools
146:13
and they are the ones that released
146:16
whether accidentally or not
146:18
coveted 19 they then spread it around
146:21
the world with all their might
146:23
with the cooperation of all the major
146:25
medical journals nobody called their
146:27
feet to the fire
146:29
the world health organization nobody's
146:31
saying why did you shut down
146:32
travel in china and send your airplanes
146:35
out
146:38
for weeks spreading the virus so we're
146:40
looking at
146:41
something large it's not really as vague
146:43
as i may be sounding
146:45
it's economic it's political
146:49
and i think we just need to be seriously
146:51
looking at every level now because this
146:53
is uh i think america is
146:56
in as much danger as prior to the civil
146:58
war prior to the revolutionary war right
147:00
now
147:03
we really need to take it seriously i'll
147:06
give you a couple of examples
147:08
of the stuff that i've been working on
147:12
writing about
147:15
a study is created in brazil
147:19
where people are given um
147:22
hydroxychloroquine
147:24
and multiples of the toxic dose for
147:26
older people
147:28
and for sick people it's put up online
147:33
and in one day it's covered in the new
147:36
york times
147:37
as don't take hydroxy it kills people
147:42
on one more day it's put up online by
147:44
the journal the american medical
147:46
association
147:49
and on and on from there
147:52
lancet has done the same thing new
147:54
england journal
147:55
medicine has done the same thing
147:59
who is doing the same thing
148:02
all of our major agencies
148:05
the the the cdc it's acting like
148:09
it's got medical jurisdiction
148:12
telling us how we're supposed to be
148:14
treated the fda is way overstepped its
148:17
legal bounds
148:19
the nih tells us that we can't treat
148:23
people with covenant
148:24
i can't i'm a doctor i could treat the
148:26
person if i wanted to i'm a psychiatrist
148:29
i'm when one of my family members got
148:31
sick
148:32
i had to put them in charge with the
148:34
front line doctors again
148:36
it's important to know about the
148:38
association of american physicians and
148:40
surgeons
148:40
and in one day she and her
148:44
partner were well in the middle of a
148:47
severe
148:49
beginning of this case of covert 19 and
148:52
she had
148:53
many many vulnerabilities she wasn't
148:55
that young
148:57
so and a lot of it involves things that
149:00
doctor earlier talking about
149:02
the physicians uh because you know we
149:05
have to give drugs you know that
149:07
and um and i'm very sympathetic to your
149:11
viewpoint because everything you're
149:12
talking about
149:13
but pretty much what they're combining
149:16
with the
149:17
medications they're using so who knows
149:19
what it is we got to
149:20
study all this we need everybody
149:24
uh working on these issues from every
149:26
branch of medicine
149:30
so i want to just leave you that we're
149:31
really looking at something that is
149:33
so much bigger than covered 19.
149:36
we are looking at the death of freedom
149:40
in science
149:41
the death of freedom in our chat rooms
149:44
and in our
149:46
twitter and then on youtube
149:49
all these companies and all these
149:50
companies want to
149:52
continue covert 19. they'll take anybody
149:56
down they feel like it who's
149:57
got a good idea about it literally
150:01
so this thing's being kept up it's being
150:03
upheld
150:04
by a huge number of collaborating
150:08
roughly collaborating
150:11
agents around the world including the
150:14
almost every billionaire that i could
150:16
check out and all
150:18
and all the big companies so i want to
150:20
leave you with the overview
150:22
and thank you so much for uh giving us
150:25
all a voice here
150:27
um and uh
150:30
one last message i'm 84 years old
150:34
i'm going on 85.
150:37
um by the way my mind seems to be
150:40
gotten a little better um
150:44
i think because uh i just keep
150:47
having a happier and happier marriage
150:48
for 35 years
150:50
my mind keeps getting better and better
150:52
under my wife's influence
150:54
and with stand for health freedom
150:59
we created uh a uh
151:03
elders who don't want the school's
151:05
clothes elders who don't want the
151:07
restaurants
151:08
closed so my message is my final message
151:11
now as an
151:12
elder and i signed this petition first
151:15
and then my wife ginger
151:16
signed that she's 17 i'm 84 going on
151:19
five she's 79
151:20
and then her mom who lives with us
151:22
signed it she's 94.
151:25
and then we have we have thousands of
151:26
people and this is all all because of
151:29
um
151:32
health stand for health freedom
151:36
and i want to say even if it killed me i
151:39
wouldn't want this being done to our
151:41
children
151:43
and that's what we say and it isn't
151:45
going to kill me not very
151:47
prob probably going to be something else
151:49
something else
151:51
actually we we think we had it we had
151:53
the loss of taste and smell and
151:54
the cough and everything way back in
151:56
january i have chinese
151:58
friends and chinese community at cornell
152:01
and not at cornell
152:03
they'll have a heart attack and fight
152:04
apply that
152:07
so we elders want you all to go
152:10
free and then we'll take care of
152:12
ourselves because we're the only
152:14
vulnerable people and we may be hardly
152:17
vulnerable at all because as you heard
152:20
today
152:21
the whole medical establishment is a
152:23
pack of liars right now
152:27
live live that's my concluding rate mark
152:30
live that's a great way to conclude dr
152:33
bregen thank you
152:34
before we close the panel off and also
152:37
close with
152:38
final remarks as well as the call to
152:40
action
152:41
dr ely would like to make one last
152:43
comment here
152:45
so feel free
152:50
dr ely will be on here in a minute
152:54
i want to acknowledge that okay are you
152:58
here
152:58
yeah i'm here i was talking and i was
153:01
sorry
153:03
yeah it was much that's as bad as my
153:04
having my snack of mixed nuts in the
153:06
middle
153:08
dr bregen we're cut from the same cloth
153:10
it was just user error buddy
153:12
so um what i what i want to say first
153:15
and foremost there was
153:16
thank you so much for doing this and i
153:19
wanted to say
153:20
on behalf of all the panelists and to
153:22
all the panelists
153:23
thank you for coming up it shouldn't be
153:26
an
153:26
act of bravery to speak truth but
153:29
for whatever reason it is and say
153:33
you your team have been amazing i just
153:36
want to say one final thought out to
153:37
anybody watching this
153:39
um and i mean this and it this might
153:42
come along as
153:42
come out as a little kitschy or whatever
153:45
i don't care
153:46
all right like what dr bregen just said
153:48
we're at a moment where we
153:50
where we need some catchy stuff but
153:53
i encourage all of my black brothers and
153:55
sisters all of my anglo warrior mamas
153:57
and papas
153:58
mi hermanos hermanas mikapuna kanes
154:02
as well as my asian uncles arabic
154:04
aunties and hebrew cousins
154:06
to join us in taking action it's we we
154:09
can't
154:10
sit on the sidelines on this one please
154:13
do what sayer asks you to do after this
154:16
join us in calling for formal
154:18
investigations into the cdc's conduct
154:21
we've all been through so much
154:24
and we deserve to know the truth that's
154:26
what dr martin is advocating for that's
154:28
what dr
154:29
jack is advocating for that's what me
154:31
and my team are advocating for
154:32
and i just want to say it's our time to
154:35
call in our ancestors and say
154:38
in the words of the great first nations
154:40
peoples
154:41
a whole itaque oyasin which means for
154:44
all of our relations
154:46
that's our call to action and our call
154:48
to service
154:49
it's not about skin tone it's not about
154:52
your culture it's not about who you
154:53
voted for
154:54
it's not about your religion and where
154:56
you worship it's about
154:58
our children and our humanity that's
155:00
what it's about
155:02
that's why we're doing this beautiful
155:04
thank you so much and thank you so much
155:07
panelists
155:08
i just want to acknowledge that every
155:09
single person that came here tonight
155:12
to share their experience knowledge and
155:14
what they've already been doing
155:15
on our behalf is contributing profoundly
155:18
to humanity
155:20
and i have so much respect and
155:21
admiration for each and every one of you
155:24
and i think by showing up in this way we
155:26
are inspiring so many of you now who are
155:28
also taking
155:29
the time and interest to really learn
155:32
about
155:32
the facts of how we ended up in this
155:35
situation
155:36
we have presently experienced around the
155:39
world
155:40
the suspension of fundamental civil
155:43
liberties
155:43
basic human rights economic destruction
155:46
that has wrought
155:48
far more damage than any specific virus
155:51
could be capable of
155:52
and so what we're asking people to do is
155:54
to join us
155:56
and be part of really taking back
155:58
control of our
156:00
destinies on a very basic level and what
156:02
we have
156:03
thankfully is the stanford health
156:06
freedom
156:06
advocacy platform all you have to do
156:10
is go down below if you're watching from
156:13
stanford freedom if you're on youtube
156:15
there'll be a link to this page and you
156:17
can go to the take
156:19
action tab then scroll down to our new
156:21
cdc campaign
156:23
this is a very effective way to send a
156:26
direct
156:27
message stanfeld freedom exists so that
156:29
there are no barriers to
156:31
entry that anyone can contact their
156:34
elected officials and
156:36
go ahead and make a a clear statement
156:39
that you stand for
156:40
everything that we've discussed here
156:42
today as far as transparency as far as
156:44
affirming
156:45
informed consent parental rights and
156:48
again
156:48
very basic human rights are at stake in
156:51
this situation
156:52
after you click on it on the tab take
156:55
action
156:56
it takes a click of a button to send a
156:59
pre-drafted customizable
157:01
email to key congressmen and women
157:04
asking for
157:05
formal hearing and investigation into
157:08
the cdc's conduct
157:10
during covet 19 specifically on the
157:14
lawfulness
157:15
of changing death certificates once you
157:18
act
157:18
on campaign please share this video and
157:21
the call to action link with at least
157:23
three people
157:24
this network effect will literally grow
157:27
this into
157:28
a movement that will affect change at a
157:31
very high
157:32
and signific significant level it's all
157:35
of us
157:35
coming together taking action together
157:38
and standing together
157:39
that makes a difference so once again
157:42
thank you so much panelists
157:44
thank you everyone that's here let's
157:45
spread this far and wide
157:47
together we are going to make a
157:48
beautiful difference in the world
157:51
thanks so much